|
Topic
:
Great Overview From People Using It For Months
 |
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
|
|
|
This question is not answered.
"Helpful" answers available: 2
.
"Solved" answers available: 1
.
|
|
Replies
:
5
-
Pages
:
1
-
Last Post
:
Feb 12, 2008 12:43 PM
by: Ron Guest
|
|
|
Posts:
352
Registered:
May 26, 2005
|
|
|
Posts:
3
Registered:
Feb 12, 2008
|
|
|
|
Editing Plugins
Posted:
Feb 12, 2008 10:01 AM
in response to: Dan Donovan
|
|
|
The AUPN overview mentions that there is a new Plugin architecture for editing. This doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere else. It could be huge if it fosters development of various plugins for processes not covered by Aperture itself (such as more sophisticated noise shaping, sharpening etc.). Anyone know more?
|
|
Posts:
84
From:
New York State
Registered:
Nov 19, 2005
|
|
|
|
Re: Editing Plugins
Posted:
Feb 12, 2008 10:23 AM
in response to: bkslater
|
|
|
Thanks for the shout out there. 
Here's the word on the plug-in architecture. It's in Aperture 2, they just haven't released an SDK on it. Personally I hope Apple starts to really push this, as it will change everything. From what I understand there's very little that can't be done in the plug in.
Right now if you go to Images>Edit With you'll see "no plug-ins installed". Once those are available, that's where you'll find them.
We're waiting on info on the SDK, as we'd like to be involved in plug-in development.
I've started a thread to discuss what plug-ins we'd like to see here
http://apertureprofessional.com/showthread.php?p=13759#post13759
Mac OS X (10.5.1)
Aperture Users Professional Network: Apertureprofessional.com
|
|
Posts:
2
From:
Seattle, WA
Registered:
Nov 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Editing Plugins
Posted:
Feb 12, 2008 12:04 PM
in response to: David Schloss
|
|
|
Plugins is exactly what I am waiting for before buying. I want either Noise Ninja or Noiseware availability without spending money on Photoshop or PSE.
Otherwise, Bibble and Bibble Pro are my only real options on the Mac. For now, I am staying with just using DPP as much as I prefer the Aperture workflow.
2.4 GhZ MBP
Mac OS X (10.5.1)
2GB RAM
|
|
Posts:
93
From:
Holland
Registered:
Feb 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Editing Plugins
Posted:
Feb 12, 2008 12:29 PM
in response to: bkslater
|
|
|
Does this mean that we could see plugins with possible "selections and regions" or "reverting from negative to positive" in the near future ?
|
|
Posts:
73
From:
Dallas, TX
Registered:
Oct 15, 2004
|
|
|
|
Re: Editing Plugins
Posted:
Feb 12, 2008 12:43 PM
in response to: David Schloss
|
|
|
I've seen what is to be some confusing info. In one place someone said that RAW support is now built into 2.0. But on the Aperture features site it says several RAW enhancements are dependent on running 10.5. Since you guys have used 2.0 can you comment on what is gained/lost if using/not using Leopard?
Thanks!
iMac G5
Mac OS X (10.4.11)
also TiPB
|
|
|
|
