namyrb, first you made me laugh at your caps near the end of your statement then telling me you wernt yelling at me. dang, it is goofy to try to put emphais in the form of "type". i use quotations and astericks as my way of emphasising and sometimes wonder if poeple will think im yelling! it crazy and funny to try to put inflections into a bunch of written words. no problem man!
look, each way of working is doable i suppose. the debate is more which one makes more sense. the thing is... i do simple "Save"'s often. a simple update with no filename change when i know im good to go on work progression. i might work all day and have clicked Save several times and hour. many times i only have 1 or 2 additional "Save as" for a project than can have obscene hours in it.
my own brain knows when i turned a page of importance or direction and its time to "mark" that turn of direction by clearly defining a project ie as "digging a hole" then "digging a hole-1". then...when i looked at my old style "simple little folder" (like in the good ole days prior to 6-21-2011) that held "everything" pertaining to the projects i knew from that simple "-1" additive... that it was an important moment in that project. i also know that the original project "digging a hole" represents fundamental evolution UP UNTIL the crossroads where it became the Save as (-1) project. the original prior to the Save as is just as important as the Save as and may need to get revisited in the future.
now in the new way not only will i have to duplicate "EVERYTIME" i open FCPX but....and this is a BIG BUT...i will have to PREDICT (im not yelling by the way) that in "this" visit to the program to work... that the NAME i give while duplicating will give distinction to my edit or not but i wont know if it deserves any true distinction till im done though will i? the older way of doing things by mere fact that i actually did a "Save as" (-1) made it significant...but now every DUPLICATION IS NOT ***NECESSARILY*** SIGNIFICANT. i wont know until im done doing something in the edit. then...OPPS in just one of the 20-40-60 duplications that i have to sift thru in my HD to see which one was important amongst the slew of unimportant safety nets that i had to create.
i know i can "color coat" the folders in the HD of importance i guess! i like colors! opps, what is apple takes color coating away in LION? ill be screwed i guess. or i know...i can reopen that drab and redundant DUPLUCATION file again (if i can find it in the mess of reduncacy... then "DUPLICATE it again" but....this time GIVE IT THAT BETTER NAME OF DISTINCTION that helps it stand out from the crowd of DUPLICATIONS on my HD...then i can (i guess) go back to my HD and throw out the meaningless DUPLICATION projects to clean up this overly redundant DISASSTER of a MESS THAT APPLE HAS NOW MADE ME DO so i dont have to live with looking at a complete mess of folders that have now been created on my HD.
WHO IS MAKING THIS NONSENSE UP AT APPLE?
INSANE and very STUPID!!! welcome to LAND OF BIG BROTHER!
david
namyrb...i think the caps are actually better than my quotations but it did make me feel like i was yelling more but i wasnt.