This discussion is archived
7089 Views 19 Replies Latest reply: Jul 14, 2010 6:52 PM by Shaluda
I just can say one thing:
The 4870 in the 10.6.3 is more responsive in every aspect of system interface... more fluid, you know.
Better Frames in 3D? No
Better Video Performance? No
The 10.6.4 seems to have more and more graphic tweaks.
PierreMac Pro Quad 2.66GHz 12 Gb 2 Discs 640Gb in RAID0, Mac OS X (10.6.2), 2 Monitors ACER 24"
Currently Being ModeratedApr 28, 2010 7:07 PM (in response to Pierre Cross)Hi Pierre,
Appreciate your comments.
I think the 4870 is a great card. Works great overall as you say. I didn't test it after the 10.6.3 update so I'll assume it's just running fine as usual but still be capable of more.
I've been waiting a long time for the GeForce 285 I have to just match the 4870's performance. It's always seemed to lag behind the Radeon, especially as regards system interface. It seemed clumsier.
In Apps like PS4 and AE, tests confirmed the 4870 was the slightly faster card. And one Rosetta game I really liked played horribly with the Nvidia, the gamers card.
But... I think 10.6.3 turned it around. At least it's on a par with the 4870 now. I think the responsiveness of the system interface is still off, but it seems better. I think it will go on into the future that Nvidia still can't make cards that "meld" together with a Mac like ATI/AMD cards have.
But the tests I've run since the change to 6.3 say it's slightly over that of the 4870 now. Adobe apps show that to me anyway. The one game I had problems with is much better though I think the Radeon was sharper. Still, Apple must have addressed something there. Something with the graphics or with Rosetta.
Well, the changes aren't enough to justify the cost of the card in my view, but for those of us who fell for it, at least it's among the two best cards out there,...now...
Merci, Pierre.MP 8-core 2.93GHz, 32GB RAM, Rad4870, 3xOCZ120, 3xIntel80, 4xVR300, Mac OS X (10.6.2), 30" HD Cinema Display, 20" Cinema Display, iPod touch, G5Quad (JIC)
Currently Being ModeratedApr 29, 2010 12:16 AM (in response to Samsara)Hi Samsara!
It's a pleasure talking to you.
I feel the same, the "meld" is perfect in ATI, that's for sure.
p.s. - the difference from 10.6.2 to 10.6.3 is a lot better but some graphic functions need to be tweakedMac Pro Quad 2.66GHz 12 Gb 2 Discs 640Gb in RAID0, Mac OS X (10.6.2), 2 Monitors ACER 24"
Currently Being ModeratedApr 29, 2010 7:34 AM (in response to Pierre Cross)Nvidia GPGPU Flash player support.
Doesn't really seem like something a Mac Pro would need, but then I think 10.6.3 has yet to show how seamless and effortless it can juggle 4 things at once yet, either!
Flash Player previews support for H.264 video hardware decoding on Mac OS X 10.6.3 -- the most recent release of the Mac OS. Gala allows developers to preview Flash Player with hardware acceleration of H.264 video on supported Mac computers
offload H.264 video decoding tasks from the CPU to deliver smooth, high quality video with minimal overhead, improving video playback performance, reducing system resource utilization
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/gala/Mac Pro 8800GT 10K VelociRaptor, Mac OS X (10.6.2), Windows 7 i7 3.2GHz GTX 260-216
Currently Being ModeratedApr 29, 2010 10:43 PM (in response to Samsara)I didn't see any increase with 10.6.3 and my GTX 285 and I use Maya and Mudbox daily. It performs horribly compared to the 4870 in Maya (and Mudbox):
http://www.vimeo.com/102968018-core Nehalem 2.66 | 24GB RAM | 120GB OCZ Vertex SSD, Mac OS X (10.6.2)
I had heard before that the 285 was not working out for Maya and other 3D apps. That's a pretty graphic example of it not.
My 3D programs aren't in the class of yours so I wouldn't be able to tell if 6.3 made a difference. If I were using Maya or similar programs (which I would be if I had money, dang it), that would be pretty much the final straw in even considering the GTX285.
I had gone back to the Radeon a long time ago, it always seemed to work better overall and the scores in the tests I made were more than fine. But with every mention of a graphics change, usually in a OS update, I put the 285 back in again and see if it's improved. Well, against the 4870 at least, it never really has.
As I said though, I thought some improvement had occurred in 6.3. It seemed so minor that I needed another perspective or two though. So I thank you BEIGE for a great reply. And one that should help a lot of people who are into the apps you are.
For me I think I'm watching a pot boil, where the oven may or may not even be turned on.MP 8-core 2.93GHz, 32GB RAM, Rad4870, 3xOCZ120, 3xIntel80, 4xVR300, Mac OS X (10.6.2), 30" HD Cinema Display, 20" Cinema Display, iPod touch, G5Quad (JIC)
Currently Being ModeratedApr 30, 2010 3:22 AM (in response to Pierre Cross)
It's a pleasure talking to you.
Always the same here, Mon Ami, I like your spirit ...
The "Meld". What could that possibly be? Is there something inherent in Nvidia graphic cards, the drivers maybe as is said, that Apple simply cannot understand or work with to get Nvidia cards to work as well as ATI cards generally do in Macs?
Nah, can't be. Apple knows everything...MP 8-core 2.93GHz, 32GB RAM, Rad4870, 3xOCZ120, 3xIntel80, 4xVR300, Mac OS X (10.6.2), 30" HD Cinema Display, 20" Cinema Display, iPod touch, G5Quad (JIC)
Currently Being ModeratedApr 30, 2010 3:33 AM (in response to The hatter)I've tried updating Flash player a couple times in the past month or so and the opened file always said I was using an even later (newer) version, so it wouldn't install. Has Adobe come out with something new? An effort to please Apple during these rancorous times? I'll have to go sneak around and see...
Message was edited by: Samsara
Currently Being ModeratedApr 30, 2010 5:56 PM (in response to The hatter)I downloaded and installed it without using the uninstaller first. There seemed to be none. Just a straight install with no error messages saying the revision was too old or too new. It popped right in. Safari seemed the same.
So, now what? Lol.
I see it on MacUpdate, and in the comments section, USE the uninstaller.
With 2.93 x 8, you don't have to worry about off loading from cpu to gpu, and you are running with GTX as it isn't supported with ATI. OpenCL is being ported and ATI will eventually do more with GPGPU/CUDA.Mac Pro 8800GT 10K VelociRaptor, Mac OS X (10.6.2), Windows 7 i7 3.2GHz GTX 260-216
Currently Being ModeratedMay 1, 2010 7:37 AM (in response to The hatter)
"Important: All users should uninstall any currently installed Flash Player before installing the latest prerelease. See below and the Release Notes for more information."
Did that apply to me ? Lol. Not the first time I rushed in a head without thinking. Bit of the tempus fugit lately.
Ok, I'll go back and see what I'm missing. Thanks Hatter.
With 2.93 x 8, you don't have to worry about off loading from cpu to gpu, and you are running with GTX as it isn't supported with ATI. OpenCL is being ported and ATI will eventually do more with GPGPU/CUDA.
Have any good articles about that? I don't see much of what's happening in terms of Graphics development. I hear a term and topic like OpenCL come along and then it fades into bits and pieces on the web. It's hard to get a picture of where or what anything is at any one time.
A ways away I would guess. The 285 as I understood was supposed to have "untapped" abilities to make it a better card for the new technologies coming out. Since the 285's drivers seem out of Apples control to master, I'd always hoped that the industries moving forward in general would push the 285 into the something special category. That may be the case, but it seems there will be other, better cards out there to choose from way before that.MP 8-core 2.93GHz, 32GB RAM, Geforce285, 3xOCZ120, 3xIntel80, 4xVR300, Mac OS X (10.6.3), 30" HD Cinema Display, 20" Cinema Display, iPod touch, G5Quad (JIC)
Mac OS X 10.6.3, which became available on March 29, 2010, is the first Mac OS X release to expose APIs that support H.264 hardware video decoding in the browser.
*2009 Mac Pro owner running GTX-285 and ATI 4870 Cards* (via Aux power Y adapters)
Just chiming in that I've got the dual high-power graphics cards running without a hitch. It's rendering with the GTX 285 and CUDA now while I use the computer with the Radeon 4870 http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/
provides parallel computing using task-based and data-based parallelism. Its architecture shares a range of computational interfaces with two competitors, NVidia's Compute Unified Device Architecture and Microsoft's DirectCompute.
OpenCL gives any application access to the Graphical Processing Unit for non-graphical computing. The GPU had previously been available for graphical applications only. The GPU memory would be available to the operating system and or applications essentially as faster system memory than the main system memory.
All the buzz lately about Flash and iPhone, Adobe vs Apple, and even Microsoft with support.
HTML5 will support playback of H.264 video only, "H.264 is an industry standard, with broad and strong hardware support." H.264 isn't accepted by the open source community because it is encumbered by patents. That's why Mozilla doesn't support H.264 in Firefox. Use of the H.264 video codec requires a license from the MPEG LA, a group that manages pools of patents on behalf of participating companies.
Microsoft is one of many licensors of patents managed by MPEG LA and as such shares in the licensing royalties collected from H.264 video licensees. Apple, another supporter of H.264, is also an MPEG LA licensor.
http://www.informationweek.com/news/Mac Pro 8800GT 10K VelociRaptor, Mac OS X (10.6.2), Windows 7 i7 3.2GHz GTX 260-216
Currently Being ModeratedMay 1, 2010 8:55 AM (in response to The hatter)Quality stuff. Pays to keep an eye out.
I'll miss ya, H-man.MP 8-core 2.93GHz, 32GB RAM, Geforce285, 3xOCZ120, 3xIntel80, 4xVR300, Mac OS X (10.6.3), 30" HD Cinema Display, 20" Cinema Display, iPod touch, G5Quad (JIC)