Skip navigation

Difference between a folder, a project and an album?

17883 Views 8 Replies Latest reply: Sep 1, 2012 9:57 PM by tylercat RSS
Pito Calculating status...
Currently Being Moderated
Aug 23, 2011 11:54 AM

I've been using Aperture a lot and feel like I have a good handle on the way it works and looks at the world. One question I come back to is what are the exact differences between Folders, Projects and Albums?


Check these assumptions/beliefs/misconceptions:


- an album can contain versions

- a project can contain albums

- a folder can contain projects and albums and other folders

- a project can contain a folder

- if I 'move' (drag and drop) a version from one album to another, then it in fact disappears from the first one and appears in the second one

- but other combinations, like from an album to a project, etc. produce other results

- if a folder contains two albums, and I brows the folder I see all the versions in both albums


... I am not sure what the differences are and why I couldn't do all of it just with folders.

... I also don't see the rhyme or reason to how each works


Any pointer, link or explanation would be greatly appreciated!!





  • phosgraphis Level 2 Level 2 (285 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 23, 2011 12:20 PM (in response to Pito)

    Check out the links in the "More Like This" list on the right.

  • DallasTim Calculating status...
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 23, 2011 12:24 PM (in response to Pito)

    This is my favorite post that answers this question:

  • Kirby Krieger Level 6 Level 6 (11,570 points)

    I'm partial to that one, too.  .  The formatting got busted when Discussions were upgraded.  Anything between plus signs should be in italics.


    Here it is correctly formatted:



    The Well-trod Path. Walk it unless you have a map for a different route.


    The Library is your image database. It contains all the information Aperture has about your images: where they are stored on your computer/drives/network, how you have them organized within Aperture, what adjustments you have made to them, all the pre-Aperture metadata (EXIF, IPTC, keywords, etc.) they had before you imported them into Aperture, and all the Aperture metadata (Version names, ratings, color labels, Stacks, additional keywords, etc.) you assign to them from within Aperture. The Library also contains small copies of each image (in effect, thumbnails, but in Aperture larger than actual thumbnails and called "Previews").


    The image is the core record in your Aperture database. The database is a giant list of images with a whole bunch of information assigned to each image.


    Within Aperture you can view individual images and any grouping of images. You can create a group based on any of the information you have about your images.


    The Project is your primary image holder. It has a unique, privileged relationship with your images: Every image must be in a Project; No image can be in more than one Project. You should make a Project from every actual, out-in-the-world photo shoot that you do. Shoot=Project. Stick to this (the mis-naming of "Project" is one of the worst interface decisions made in Aperture).


    You will regularly want to view your images in groups other than the Project in which they reside. Aperture provides several specific containers for this (as well as superb tools for creating ad hoc groupings). As a family, those containers are Albums. Aperture includes (regular) Albums, Smart Albums, and the following albums dedicated to special tasks: Book, Light Table, Slide Show, Web Journal, Web Page. Any image can be in any album, and can be in as many albums as you want.


    As your Aperture database grows, you will want to organize your Projects and Albums. Aperture provides Folders to aid you. Folders hold groups of Projects, Albums, and other Folders. Folders cannot contain images which are not in a Project or Album: You do not put images in Folders; you put containers in Folders.


    The organization of your image database is entirely for you to customize for your needs.


    There are two additional pieces of the Aperture puzzle every new user needs to understand in order to make good use of it.


    In additional to what I listed above, your Library may or may not contain your original image files. Each image in Aperture has an original. Aperture is non-destructive -- your original image files are never altered. If the original image file is contained within your Library, it is called a Managed Master (Aperture's pointer to this file, and the file itself, are both inside the Library). If the original image file is not contained within your Library, it is called a Referenced Master (the pointer in your Aperture Library points to a file outside your Aperture Library). Referenced Masters bring some important advantages -- but the new user of Aperture can rely on Managed Masters until the need for Referenced Masters arises. Aperture makes is easy to convert your original image files back and forth from Managed to Referenced.


    A Version is the name given to the variants and copies you make of you original image within Aperture. You use Aperture's tools to make Adjustments to images. Each group of adjustments you make to one image is saved as a Version. You can (and should) create as many Versions as you need. Versions appear as images, but are simply text instructions which tell Aperture what Adjustments to make to the original image file. Aperture presents these to you on-the-fly. This is brilliant. It means that Versions are minuscule compared to Masters. The gain in storage and computational efficiency is enormous.


    This also means that your images in Aperture do not exist as image format files. In order to create an image format file, you must export the image from within Aperture. There is no reason to do this until you need an image format file outside of Aperture.


    Aperture, then, is best understood as a workspace for

    • storing
    • organizing
    • adjusting
    • preparing for publication, and
    • publishing

    digital photographs.


    Your workflow is

    • shoot
    • import as Project(s)
    • add image-specific metadata
    • organize into Albums, organize Albums and Projects with Folders
    • make adjustments to images (crop, rotate, change exposure, etc. etc. etc)
    • prepare for publication
    • publish.





    Thanks for posting the link.

    MacBook Pro 13, Mac OS X (10.6.8), 8 G / 500 G internal / 5 TB external / NEC 2490 / ColorMunki Pho
  • Kirby Krieger Level 6 Level 6 (11,570 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 26, 2011 8:39 PM (in response to Pito)

    Pito -- I'm not seeing the same behavior as you.  Please confirm: you select an Image.  You drag-and-drop the Image onto another Project name listed on the Library tab of the Inspector.  While dragging, the cursor changes to a plus sign.  You end up with two copies of your Version, one in each Project?

  • Kirby Krieger Level 6 Level 6 (11,570 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 28, 2011 2:37 PM (in response to Pito) tion=14%26tasks=true


    Sorry -- don't have time for a complete answer.  Projects are very different from Albums.

  • tylercat Calculating status...

    I can't thank you enough! Brilliant synopsis!!! Huge help in understanding the breakdown of libraries.


More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (11)


  • This solved my question - 10 points
  • This helped me - 5 points
This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.