Skip navigation

Pimping up Mac Pro early 2009

587 Views 9 Replies Latest reply: Dec 31, 2012 6:10 AM by The hatter RSS
tlombardi79 Calculating status...
Currently Being Moderated
Dec 21, 2012 3:42 PM



I have an early 2009 Mac Pro 4,1 with one quad core 2.66ghz Xeon processor and 4x2Gb of RAM. The machine is packed with disks for storage and is running osx 10.6 off a Western digital WDC WD6400AAKS-41H2B0 640Gb 7200rpm drive.


I'm a pro photographer working on weddings commercial stuff and Ive been working with the machine for 3 good years. But s we all know software keeps becoming more hungry and the machine is starting to become cumbersome for my workflows especially ever since i started working with Lightroom 4. I was wondering if it is worth pimping the machine up a bit and get another year or so off it before moving onto a shiny new iMac with lightning fast thunderbolt ports and really expensive storage arrays to go with it.


The Mac Pro has 2x2Tb(Raid1-internal-via OS X) and 2x3Tb (Raid1 via esata) which are both nearing their capacities. So i also have to think about a long term storage investment since I have a full year of weddings to soot next year which I definitely do not have where to fit right now.


Was thinking that if I get 2x8Gb of Ram (~ $160) and keep 2x2Gb of RAM to have a total of 20GB and buy a 240Gb SSD drive (~ $160) to store my OS on, the machine would perform considerably faster. But then again I would have to invest in storage arrays too and I cannot connect any more esata devices to my Mac pro which makes me want an iMac to be able to connect an uber expensive thunderbolt 6-bay storage system which can only come full of disks rather than an enclosure only (which would allow you to buy more disks as you go along).


So what do you guys think? Is it worth upgrading the Mac Pro? If yes, which SSD drives are best for this kind of application? a hybrid drives worth considering? Or should I just ditch it and go for a new 27" iMac when they're out in January?


I really like the Mac Pro cos I think they're incredibly solid systems but then again, the iMac has an awesome screen which makes me want one badly!


Decisions, decisions!

Mac Pro, Mac OS X (10.6.8)
  • Grant Bennet-Alder Level 8 Level 8 (48,110 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 21, 2012 5:55 PM (in response to tlombardi79)

    More RAM. for the work you do, at least 2* 8GB.


    A Boot Drive (with only System, Library, Applications, and the hidden unix files including Paging/Swap gives a better overall speedup than just switching to an SSD. This is because the disks are the slowest component (once you get enough memory, and you do not have enough) and anything that moves the drive heads away from long, continuous reading or long continuous writing to the same file slows down your Mac.


    Mirrored RAID is not Backup.  Mirrored RAID helps a drive failure from becoming a Data Disaster. You still need a Backup plan that copies religiously. RAID does not protect against accidental deletion or "crazy software". Think about whether the best use of those drive is a RAID. RAID Backup is particularly questionable -- you are almost always better served by making two separate copies, possibly separated in time.

    Mac Pro (Early 2009), Mac OS X (10.6.8), & Server, PPC, & AppleTalk Printers
  • RatVega™ Level 4 Level 4 (1,855 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 22, 2012 2:45 PM (in response to tlombardi79)

    32GB RAM: As we used to say in drag racing, It's your circus and you can have as many clowns as you like... 

    The question is whether your work can use that much.


    Disk Storage: The current generation of hard drives can fail, but the MTBF data basically says it won't happen. IMHO, RAID 1 is probably overkill. Reorganizing as individual drives would allow you to duplicate all the data (if you want to do that in the same box.)


    For a serious (and fast) storage, look into a 5- or 6-spindle external RAID5. They can be built relatively inexpensively.


    System drive organization: The OS X installer assumes that you have hundreds (thousands?) of GB available, so it dumps everything in the same space in a default install. It is possible to limit the what is installed, and then move the User (which holds most all your personal saves) to a different drive. This "streamlines" the operation of the system drive, whether is is rotating or SSD.

  • The hatter Level 9 Level 9 (58,535 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 23, 2012 7:28 AM (in response to tlombardi79)

    Pro photographer also and has some tips for serious user upgrades and CS6 and other apps:



    With large arrays and even larger TB size drives, I would not recommend RAID5. 6 maybe.

  • Grant Bennet-Alder Level 8 Level 8 (48,110 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 30, 2012 8:32 AM (in response to tlombardi79)

    Anyone know which ones i should use? [for 2009 model]

    The lowest numbered slots, which are the ones starting at the front of the shelf on the right (and back of the shelf at the left if 2-chip equipped).




    • Establishing a Boot Drive on ANY Drive has more workflow payback than an SSD with no Boot drive.


    • RAID benefit will not be profound in the small random reads and write from/to the System Drive.


    • RAID benefit will not be as pronounced on SSD as on a rotating drive.


    • Striped RAID needs scrupulous backup because a failure takes out ALL data with no practical chance of recovery of anything.

    Mac Pro (Early 2009), Mac OS X (10.6.8), & Server, PPC, & AppleTalk Printers
  • The hatter Level 9 Level 9 (58,535 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 31, 2012 6:10 AM (in response to tlombardi79)

    I go for redundancy and would never leave and trust my data just to TimeMachine (though you can setup two such backup sets and have daily, weekly, etc T/M sets), I would include cloning your voume as well. Immedate access, can archive as well, and mountable.


More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)


  • This solved my question - 10 points
  • This helped me - 5 points
This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.