Skip navigation

Why did Aperture just download over 500 duplicates from my camera.

445 Views 7 Replies Latest reply: Jan 10, 2013 8:05 AM by phosgraphis RSS
Davidatthepoint Calculating status...
Currently Being Moderated
Jan 8, 2013 8:24 PM

Despite having ticked 'do not import duplicates', Aperture imported over 500 duplicates from my Canon 7D.

 

Anyone have an idea why this happened? I take it I have no choice but to go through and remove these manually.

MacBook Pro with Retina display, Mac OS X (10.7.4)
  • Kirby Krieger Level 6 Level 6 (11,550 points)

    The built-in dupe-sleuth is rather dim-witted.  All it checks is file name and the date-time stamp (iirc).  If you change either -- for instance, you rename files on import -- it assumes (not without reason) that the files are different (they are) and imports them.

     

    I just shoot a separator frame each time I put a card in a camera.  (Point at a light source, hold up one hand with a finger extended, and take an out-of-focus shot.  Easy to pick out.  Every exposure preceeding the last separator frame has been already imported.)  Because I _always_ rename my files on import, I could not use Aperture's "Do not import duplicates" function.

     

    Grouping (and then deleting) the most-recently imported dupes is easy.  Select the "Photos" container, and filter for the import sessions that are most recent.  You will have to add the Filter Rule "Import Session".

  • phosgraphis Level 2 Level 2 (285 points)

    ... I do use a script that puts them in a yyyy/mm/dd folder system (you'd think Aperture would be able to do that but no).

     

    A little OT, but just curious why you are using a script. Aperture is certainly capable of importing files into a yyyy/mm/dd folder structure, and others, by choosing the "Image Year/Month/Day" folder naming preset in the import settings. What is it about your scheme that Aperture can't handle? 

  • phosgraphis Level 2 Level 2 (285 points)

    Thanks...I get it now. You are referring to the library organization, not the organization of the physical folders/files.

  • phosgraphis Level 2 Level 2 (285 points)

    Exactly. Using a referenced approach, the actual location of the image files can be totally different from Aperture's library organization. Or they can be the same, or anything in between. When importing for a referenced organization Aperture provides a lot of flexibility to specify where the actual images should be stored. For a managed system, not so much--as you have discovered. The limitations in library organization apply in both cases, though. 

Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Legend

  • This solved my question - 10 points
  • This helped me - 5 points
This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.