Skip navigation

Is SMBX on 10.8.2 ready for primetime?

7619 Views 22 Replies Latest reply: Sep 21, 2013 1:26 PM by basilmir RSS
1 2 Previous Next
Hans Vallden Level 1 Level 1 (5 points)
Currently Being Moderated
Feb 3, 2013 3:00 AM

There has been much discussion over the past couple years about Apple's choice to swap Samba for their own SMB implementation 'SMBX'. I've read reports of some problems with SMBX in the past versions of OS X but it is difficult to put the various internet sources into perspective to determine the 'production worthiness' of SMBX. Many of the gripes appear to be directed at the lack of SMB 1.0 protocol version, but isn't that irrelevant if file sharing for modern OS clients exclusively? AFAIK, deploying Samba as an alternative has it's own set of shortcomings.

 

I am putting together an OS X Server 10.8.2 AFP/SMB file sharing server for a small 100 employee company with a mixed Mac/Win Vista&7&8 client base. I need file sharing to be reliable, rock solid preferably, but most of all, I need things to work for all of the above mentioned clients.

 

I would appreaciate if the distinguished board members actually using SMB file sharing in a comparable or better environment, would share their experiences on this topic. Which way would you go and why?

 

We use ACL's in access control, in case that has any relevance.

OS X Mountain Lion (10.8.2)
  • Markus Reinhard Calculating status...
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 4, 2013 8:45 AM (in response to Hans Vallden)

    some of my customers have such big performance problems with SMB since Apple switch to SMBX so the decided to switch to a hardware Windows server! It's really slow with bigger files.

     

    Apple do you read this?

  • PowerSystem Calculating status...
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 6, 2013 12:46 AM (in response to Hans Vallden)

    Yes SMBX is SMB2 only,

    There are a lot of discussion on the Internet about the SMBX implementation.

    At the moment the best way to use SMB on a Mac Server is to install samba (check the SMBup software)

  • FromOZ Level 2 Level 2 (400 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 6, 2013 4:16 AM (in response to Markus Reinhard)

    Markus Reinhard wrote:

     

    some of my customers have such big performance problems with SMB since Apple switch to SMBX [...]

     

    Apple do you read this?

     

    For the record it needs to be understood that the reason why Apple stopped using Samba and went to an in-house solution.

     

    It was nothing to do with, not initiated by, Apple. It was due solely to the fact that Samba moved to the GPL 3 and its deliberately unworkable, antithetical to business, licencing rules which have the net result of reducing your freedom of choice.

     

    So blame the so-called 'Free Software Foundation' and it's leader Mister.... Richard M. Stallman.

     

    http://www.freakingnews.com/Richard-M-Stallman-Caricature-Pictures-101553.asp

     

    There is a reason why many thinking open source developers will not use the GPL 3.

  • FromOZ Level 2 Level 2 (400 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 6, 2013 4:24 AM (in response to Hans Vallden)

    Understood - but I also believe that people should understand why Apple made the switch.

     

    Also if you want (understandably of course) to keep the discussion purely technical then perhaps as the OP you should have set Markus straight on the facts — as he was injecting complaints into the discussion. Cheers.

  • Markus Reinhard Level 1 Level 1 (15 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 6, 2013 4:45 AM (in response to FromOZ)

    Sorry if I was understood wrong, the problem is that the actual implementation of SMBX is a problem for my customers.

    I don't say Apple should install samba.

     

    Apple is selling a product which is mostly nice, but some features are not well implemented (it worked much more better before).

     

    I don't want to manage an second system (with all the work it needs with authentication, backup...)

     

    I really, really hope that Apple is working on a better implementation.

  • FromOZ Level 2 Level 2 (400 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 6, 2013 4:48 AM (in response to Markus Reinhard)

    I agree with you Markus — I really hope and trust Apple can 'recover' from this and build us a solid SMB implementation. I'm sorry if I came across a bit 'strong'. I get frustrated that the so-called 'white knights' of the FSF actually make things worse for us as general users of software.

     

    Anyway I don't want to hijack Hans' post anymore!

  • Markus Reinhard Level 1 Level 1 (15 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 6, 2013 4:56 AM (in response to Hans Vallden)

    you are totally right about this, there are a lot of stumbling blocks

     

    I'm a bit doubtful about Samba myself. How easy is it in real world to achieve OD and Kerberos auth, consistent file locking with AFP server, etc. with Samba?

     

     

    As Apple has made a lot of updates since the new server version, hopefully there is coming an update for SMBX soon ;-)

     

    For me to manage a samba installation on the same server is only a workaround for some time.

  • Markus Reinhard Level 1 Level 1 (15 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 6, 2013 5:21 AM (in response to Hans Vallden)

    If the files get bigger, the transfer rate slows down so much that working on smb-server shares is not acceptable.(here specific with the windows software ArcGis)

     

    They worked since some years that way on the SMB-share on the mac server without problems.

     

    there are some copying test with some big files:

    on a window server the data was transferred in about 3.5 min

    on a mac mini server with 10.8.2 and SMBup installed about 4 min

    on a mac mini server with 10.8.2 and SMBX they stopped the test after 8 min, only 20% transferred.

     

    I can't say that it is representative but it shows the problem.

    The windows server and the mac mini with SMBup are older hardware models for testing.

    The mac mini server with 10.8.2 and Apple SMB is a model 2012 with a thunderbolt raid attached

1 2 Previous Next

Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (1)

Legend

  • This solved my question - 10 points
  • This helped me - 5 points
This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.