Skip navigation

Really, Honestly Duplicate a Track

328 Views 6 Replies Latest reply: Jun 24, 2013 7:50 AM by Horrorshow RSS
VmusicV Calculating status...
Currently Being Moderated
Feb 5, 2013 7:13 PM

Hi,

I am OUTRAGED that you can not.... in one command.....honestly, completely, truly duplicate a track..... which means, the track and its contents.

 

How is it that freeware like Audacity lets you honestly, truly, completely....duplicate a track.....but not Garageband.....all the Windows DAW software seems to understand what the word duplicate means, but the "geniuses" at Apple don't get it?

 

The definition of duplicate means - EVERYTHING that is, or is part of the first thing, is replicated to the second or duplicate thing.... not just the "shell" of it, or part of it, but EVERYTHING.

 

Certainly... Apple's not THAT LAME, that you can not with one command totally, completely, honestly duplicate a track in Garageband.

 

Frustrated in Filly

iPhone 4S, iOS 5, GB
  • Edgar Level 3 Level 3 (965 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 6, 2013 4:59 PM (in response to VmusicV)

    OK, first of all take a deep breath, calm down and think it over.

     

    Why on earth do you want honestly, completely, truly duplicate a track AND its content. I'm not sure what your background is but from a technical (sound engineering) point of view, the result would be the same as if you would raise the level of the original track by 6dB (if the signal would be correlated), otherwise it would be 3dB.

    I can't remember ever needing that feature which doesn't mean that different workflows, different types of music and production style would require that. Usually I want one or the other:

     

    1. Copying the Track so I have the same Instrument or Track settings and record a variation of the original region
    2. Use the same content (Region) but put it on a different Track/Instrument to double it
    3. Using the same Instrument AND the same content … like I said, just raise the level

     

     

    All I'm saying is before starting the name calling, don't assume that the rest of the world (or outside the Windows world) everybody thinks exactly like you do. I don't think that you can do that in Logic either, at least I never looked for it (because I honestly, completely, truly

    NEVER needed it.

     

    Hope that helps (to calm you down)

     

    Edgar Rothermich

    http://DingDingMusic.com/Manuals

    'I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise, from my recommendation or link.'

  • Edgar Level 3 Level 3 (965 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 6, 2013 6:08 PM (in response to VmusicV)

    Yes, you have some very good points.

    So maybe it's me that I never came across that need with my type of workflow.

  • Jackwr Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 7, 2013 8:57 PM (in response to VmusicV)

    Glad I read this post. I didn't try the duplicate track because I assumed it brought it all and I didn't see the point.  Good to know it just copies the track shell. For me that's a good thing. I won't have to keep making all my mic settings for each track.........duh and I was wondering how to just bring the settings and NOT the content. Now just tweak what's needed when changing from guitar, mandolin, fiddle, bass......now if I could just change the track icons to match the instrument in the track.

  • Horrorshow Level 1 Level 1 (5 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 24, 2013 7:50 AM (in response to VmusicV)

    I agree with VmusicV on this. I regularly edit presentation soundtracks for verbal slips, mic pops, etc. The speakers like to compare the original with the edited to make sure I haven't been too "creative" in my edits; perfectly understandable. So when I "duplicate" the track, I want the thing holus-bolus, not just the shell, after which I apply various adjustments. If I goof, it's nice to have the clean track to go back to.

     

    My vote: I say "duplicate" means just that. Duplicate the thing or use a different term. Call it "shell duplicate" or something. Come on Apple, think different if you must but do think.

Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Legend

  • This solved my question - 10 points
  • This helped me - 5 points
This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.