1 2 Previous Next 15 Replies Latest reply: Jun 10, 2013 1:05 PM by okayson
EDLIU Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)

Hi,

 

Should I get an iMac, and upgrade to a newer one in around, say, 5-6 years? Or should I get a "more expensive" MacPro, and use it for the next 10 years?

 

Which one is a better choice?

 

Thanks.

 

Ed


MacBook Pro, OS X Mountain Lion
  • 1. Re: iMac & MacPro
    mende1 Level 10 Level 10 (89,570 points)

    At this moment, an iMac may be faster than a Mac Pro, but the Mac Pro is a customizable computer that allows things that an iMac doesn't allow, as replacing graphic cards, add lots of hard disks, lots of memory... It's your decision, but I think that the iMac is a better option now

  • 2. Re: iMac & MacPro
    ssls6 Level 4 Level 4 (2,715 points)

    Really depends on what you want the machine for.  Just a typical desktop?  mende1 is right.  Get an Imac, get apple care, and enjoy one of the sexist machines on the market right now.  I faced a similar decision last week and went with a refurb 6core 3.33 mac pro but I had extenuating circumstances.

     

    1) I already have a 27" IPS monitor (dell u2711 on my desk)

    2) I have plenty of room under the desk for another tower

    3) Have a 32gig i3770 centos machine under there now for engineering work (software doesn't run on mac)

    4) Not a big computer gamer

     

    Even with my circumstances, I almost went for the new iMac.  I expect a new mac pro at the end of the year but that is just a guess.  It really depends on Intel and their schedules but those have been slipping.  Their current chips in the server class can't support thunderbolt and why do a new mac pro without it.

     

    I would not buy a new iMac without apple care.  Good luck.

  • 3. Re: iMac & MacPro
    EDLIU Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)

    MacPro coming to market Spring, 2013

     

    http://www.macrumors.com/2013/02/06/apple-tells-reseller-that-the-new-mac-pro-is -arriving-in-spring-2013/

     

    And, "why is the AppleCare necessary for the new iMac?

     

    Thanks.

     

    Ed

  • 4. Re: iMac & MacPro
    mende1 Level 10 Level 10 (89,570 points)

    The new iMac has got a lot of parts soldered (near everything), so if the iMac gets damaged, the repair will be expensive

  • 5. Re: iMac & MacPro
    gen_ Level 2 Level 2 (335 points)

    If you expect your Mac Pro to stay relevant for 10 years then definitely get an iMac. Mac Pros came out in 2004, they arent even 10 years old now and anyone here will tell you that Mac Pro 1,1 (the first ones) are no longer supported by Apple themselves as far as software (You need a hack to get Lion on one for example).

     

    Apple would much prefer you get an iMac. It's better value for money if you don't need the expandability or workstation benefits too.

  • 6. Re: iMac & MacPro
    The hatter Level 9 Level 9 (58,880 points)

    Aug 2006 is 6.5 yrs

    Prototypes probably go back to 2005 June when first Skulltrail and EFI 1.0

  • 7. Re: iMac & MacPro
    EDLIU Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)

    Hi,

     

    What's the "life curcle" for a Mac(or iMac/MBP)?

     

    Thanks.

     

    Ed

  • 8. Re: iMac & MacPro
    ssls6 Level 4 Level 4 (2,715 points)

    The life cycle is ~4 years on style, ~1-1.5 year on chip changes (mini, iMac, macbook).  The mac pro has moved very slow.  Many assumed it was dead until Tim Cook made an off the cuff comment about something exciting later in 2013.  No one here knows what that means.  It could be a cube, two mini's fused together, or the same basic tower with all new hardware.

     

    I think thunderbolt will be a must for the new machine which can't be done properly on even the sandy bridge chips.  Maybe the server class ivy bridge chips will have the integrated hardware for thunderbolt or maybe some sort of dedicated chip will be used.  I personally think thunderbolt is the hold up or we would have already seen chip updates to the pro line.  I think apple only sells thunderbolt monitors now.

     

    Mac pro's are such a small market for apple that it is anyone's guess.

  • 9. Re: iMac & MacPro
    EDLIU Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)

    Hi,

     

    iMac is faster than Mac Pro? But Mac Pro is 12 core and iMac is only Quad core.

     

    BTW, will we get a "6 core" iMac soon?

     

    Thanks.

     

    Ed

  • 10. Re: iMac & MacPro
    gen_ Level 2 Level 2 (335 points)

    @EDLIU

     

    In short, no, we will not get a 6 core iMac. iMacs use and have always used low power laptop versions of current hardware, as it makes it a lot easier to make them fit into such thin and sleek designs. 6 core processors won't be added to the iMac until Intel make a 6 core laptop chip, which I reckon is a very long time away. Maybe they will with Haswell, but I very much doubt it as there simply is no demand in the laptop market in general. Higher clocked 4/8 core/thread i7s still havent been reached in that space yet and in most cases they would be faster than low clocked 6/12 core/thread units.

     

    And yes, a iMac in most cases is similar in performance to a 12 Core Mac Pro, and faster than a single processor unit. Single Processor Mac Pros are using CPUs two generations behind iMacs. The performance differenc is about 20% per Ghz, so a 3Ghz iMac would give you the performance of a 3.6Ghz Mac Pro if everything else was identical. Multi-Processor Mac Pro's are great in certain uses where predetermined things that need to be done can be split into threads and worked on as if each prcessor was an island, but the two processors are terrible at communicating with each other, so many things dont get that big a boost from Multi Processor setups.

  • 11. Re: iMac & MacPro
    EDLIU Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)

    Hi, Gen,

     

    It's internesting to know that iMac uses "laptop chips". And surprised to know that iMac is "faster" then MacPro.

     

    BTW, is "CPU clock more important, or cores more important"?

     

    Thanks.

     

    Ed

  • 12. Re: iMac & MacPro
    Mike Connelly Level 4 Level 4 (1,785 points)

    Early iMacs used mobile chips, but they switched to desktop ones years ago and still use them.  The mac mini uses mobile chips, maybe that's the source of confusion.

     

    Cooling and cost are probably the biggest reason for no six core imacs so far, I assume we'll see them someday.

  • 13. Re: iMac & MacPro
    The hatter Level 9 Level 9 (58,880 points)

    i3 and even i5 don't say a lot, Nac Pro uses SERVER chip Xeon

  • 14. Re: iMac & MacPro
    Mike Connelly Level 4 Level 4 (1,785 points)

    I'm not sure what that has to do with my post.

     

    If someone is doing demanding work, they would want the i7 version of the iMac which performs very well, although the higher end mac pros with more cores will outperform it if the software is optimized for those cores.

1 2 Previous Next