Skip navigation

Has anyone deciphered the naming convention Aperture uses when a plugin creates new files? It just doesn't seem consistent.

239 Views 2 Replies Latest reply: Mar 19, 2013 7:58 PM by John Mather RSS
John Mather Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)
Currently Being Moderated
Mar 19, 2013 6:20 PM

This is very confusing. Plugins don't seem to behave the same as far naming the newer version created in the process. Most commonly when actived, they first create a tiff that has the same name as the original version. At one time I thought that version was named ### - Version2. I'll have to look at the prefs. to see I can change that. Only after the plugin is finished does the processed image get a version name with a number. The original tiff remains but unchanged. I can actually eliminate it. I 'm wondering if this is complicated by the software company's approach , i.e. Topz, Nik, OnOne. It seems so. Stacking may prefs might be part of it too. I know some plugins actually create IPTC fields.


However what I really want is a way to track what plugin(s) were used on images. Actually it would be preferable if I could know even more detail but I know that's not likely unless the phantom version 4 has some improved way of handling plugins to act more like PS and even lest us go back and tweak changes.


In the meantime I've created a text field called Processing Notes where I put the info.


Anyone have a reliable, easy method to track the plugins and the versions they create?

iMac, OS X Mountain Lion (10.8.3), Aperture 3.4


More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)


  • This solved my question - 10 points
  • This helped me - 5 points
This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.