Currently Being ModeratedJun 19, 2013 4:23 PM (in response to Linc Davis)
Hi Linc. Thanks again for the further instructions.
I stumbled onto something yesterday that is fascinating. My husband left for the evening, and all of a sudden my ability to go to those two sites became significantly faster. As fast as his MBP's load times normally are. I experimented throughout the day today to make sure that the problem can be consistantly replicated. It can.
This is a little hard to explain in writing, so I hope you can hang with me. First, as background: both sites I experience a slowdown with are self-administered Wordpress-based sites hosted on the same GoDaddy server. One is mine, one is his. What I eventually discovered is that whenever his laptop has a browser window open in which he is logged in as the administrator of HIS Wordpress site, then my browser speed is completely bogged down in trying to load MINE (even just as a viewer...not even trying to log in). Keep in mind that each of these two sites have completely DIFFERENT domain names. But again...I do know that they are hosted on the same server.
In a nutshell: if he is logged into his site on his computer, then my speed reduces drastically loading the other (my own) site on my computer. Every. Single. Time.
The minute I close his browser window on his MPB, then my MPB's speed to load my site's url is is returned to normal.
I initially thought maybe it was some kind of "first in" gets priority...perhaps because our wireless network is set up to share an IP address using DHCP. BUT, when I reverse the procedure and log into one of the sites first on my MPB, his laptop still loads the pages with full speed. It is only when *HIS* MBP logs into one of the pages first, that my MBP load times increase exponentially.
Obviously, this does give me a non-elegant workaround (make him log off, if I need to look at my site)...but it is still the biggest mystery. I just have no idea why it would behave in this way. It would seem that in a corporate environment that people on different computers are concurently hitting the same sites all throughout the day, with no painfully obvious slowdowns. So I don't know why my computer is bogging down...especially when I'm not even hitting the same SITE...just hitting a site hosted on the same server.
But that said, I did follow the instructions that you gave for the Network Utility (above), in case there was something in there that caught your eye:
Lookup screen:Lookup has started…
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 34710
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;troubleensued.com. IN ANY
;; ANSWER SECTION:
troubleensued.com. 2733 IN A 188.8.131.52
Received 51 bytes from 10.0.1.1#53 in 5 ms
Ping screen:Ping has started…
PING troubleensued.com (184.108.40.206): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 220.127.116.11: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=27.926 ms
64 bytes from 18.104.22.168: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=25.132 ms
64 bytes from 22.214.171.124: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=29.325 ms
64 bytes from 126.96.36.199: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=29.303 ms
64 bytes from 188.8.131.52: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=26.595 ms
64 bytes from 184.108.40.206: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=27.633 ms
64 bytes from 220.127.116.11: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=27.863 ms
64 bytes from 18.104.22.168: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=28.473 ms
64 bytes from 22.214.171.124: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=29.825 ms
64 bytes from 126.96.36.199: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=29.147 ms
--- troubleensued.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 25.132/28.122/29.825/1.361 ms
Thanks again for taking an interest in this and guiding me through these various exercises. You have certainly pointed me in directions that helped me narrow this issue down (and let me know I'm not crazy). I certainly do plan to award "points" to you, but I don't want to accidentally end the conversation quite yet in case you have other ideas.
Currently Being ModeratedJun 19, 2013 4:34 PM (in response to bug00)
This appears to be a server issue, not a problem with your Mac. That's about all I can tell you.
Currently Being ModeratedJun 19, 2013 5:27 PM (in response to Linc Davis)
Okay, thanks, Linc. So to summarize...a server can deliver a particular site perfectly fast to all computers except mine (and mine *only* slows down when a browser window on another MBP on the same wireless network is already open to a site on that server). But it's not a problem related to my Mac.
If no other computer is experiencing a slowdown (which no one else who accesses the site regularly has experienced), I honestly don't even know how to begin to tell GoDaddy that this is their server problem...a problem that is only manifesting on my computer. Any ideas how to broach that discussion?
Currently Being ModeratedJun 19, 2013 6:44 PM (in response to bug00)
I guess I should have said it's a network or server issue. There's no obvious way in which the remote server could distinguish between clients on the same local network, which is what you seem be saying it does. The router could. Third-party routers can do odd things.
If you want to try something exotic that almost certainly won't make any difference, try this.
Currently Being ModeratedJun 20, 2013 10:18 AM (in response to Linc Davis)
Thanks, Linc. Considering that earlier in the thread you felt the network was apparently ruled out as being the problem by the results of some previous tests you had me do, I think at this point I'll just leave well enough alone.
My network works perfectly for one latop all of the time, and works perfectly for my laptop in all instances *except* for these two urls in certain reproduceable circumstances. So, it's not worth it to me to mess around with the MTU settings of my hardware...most especially because you said that trying it "almost certainly won't make any difference". ;-)
I do appreciate the time you invested. If anyone else has experienced an issue like this and gives me a fix, or if I discover anything on my own pertaining to this very specific issue, I'll certainly post back.
Currently Being ModeratedJun 20, 2013 10:32 AM (in response to bug00)
earlier in the thread you felt the network was apparently ruled out
"Apparently" is the key word. The facts you've stated since then don't fit any pattern I recognize.
Currently Being ModeratedJun 20, 2013 10:39 AM (in response to Linc Davis)
Gotcha...I hear you. When I have a mystery, I guess I have a goooooood mystery.
BTW, my curiosity got the better of me. I decided to try your suggestion of resetting the MTU to 1280 after all, and like you expected...it didn't make any difference. Oh well...at least I tried.