1 2 3 Previous Next 39 Replies Latest reply: Jul 11, 2013 1:09 PM by DJG77 Go to original post
  • 30. Re: 16gb iphone only has 13.09 gb capacity on itunes?
    DJG77 Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)

    Oh noooo! I've become the concern troll of the ASC? Really? For disagreeing with you? How pathetic.

     

    You really do have delusions of grandeur don't you. So basically people can't post an opinion on anything unless you agree with them or you like it otherwise you put them in your troll list?

     

    No other forum works in that way and regardless of how long a thread has been dormant if it's open it's up for discussion. The 'custom' is not the 'rules'.

     

    Stop being so downright rude. You speak to me in that tone then I will not move along.  The only 'troll' I see here is you, hiding under your bridge waiting to shout at people. Grow up.

  • 31. Re: 16gb iphone only has 13.09 gb capacity on itunes?
    Dah•veed Level 7 Level 7 (30,305 points)

    Yes sir Mr Pushy Brit. Whatever you say sir, Mr Pushy Brit. Because we can all see what an expert you are on all things, Mr Pushy Brit. OMG, halleluja, the salvation of the ASC has arrived to set us all in our places. By all means keep posting till your heart's content.

  • 32. Re: 16gb iphone only has 13.09 gb capacity on itunes?
    DJG77 Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)

    For the record I'm actually female.

     

    I don't see what me being British has to do with anything, unless you are discriminating, which is against the 'etiquette' of these boards.

     

    My replies to you were abrupt in reaction to the patronising and rude tone you spoke to me in. I certainly do not claim to know everything, but I do take exception to being spoken to in the way you have spoken to me.

     

    My original post was not rude in any way yet you chose to respond in a very patronising rude manner and there was no need for it at all. Please try being civil with people. maybe that's just the difference with us 'Brits', we have manners.

     

    I shall leave it there for now as I have said my piece and don't want to continue arguing further.

  • 33. Re: 16gb iphone only has 13.09 gb capacity on itunes?
    Dah•veed Level 7 Level 7 (30,305 points)

    Rudeness is in the eye of the beholder Ms Brit. My response to your post directed at me wasn't the slightest bit rude, it was a brief explanation. You were rude to me and I let you know and you just continued to be rude and condescending.

  • 34. Re: 16gb iphone only has 13.09 gb capacity on itunes?
    Hachre Level 1 Level 1 (85 points)

    Well in this beholder's eye Ms Brit is right!

  • 35. Re: 16gb iphone only has 13.09 gb capacity on itunes?
    Dah•veed Level 7 Level 7 (30,305 points)

    You're free to think as you wish.

  • 36. Re: 16gb iphone only has 13.09 gb capacity on itunes?
    DJG77 Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)

    You were rude. You had a go at me for resurrecting a thread and then continued to tell me I obviously couldn't read properly.

     

    That to me is rude. Which is why you got the reply back that you did.

     

    I simply asked why you were calling the person a troll who in my eyes had given a valid opinion. That wasn't rude it was a legitimate question.

     

    I am a fairly newish user of these threads and don't know what your 'usual customs' are, I can only go by the usual rules on all other forums I use. Many threads are resurrected if other people are still having  similar issues and want to comment on it. Such is the way of forums.

  • 37. Re: 16gb iphone only has 13.09 gb capacity on itunes?
    Dah•veed Level 7 Level 7 (30,305 points)

    When you come along 18 months later, you have no idea what may or may not have actually occurred in a thread. You just know what's left. You don't know anything about the original thread, what someone did or didn't say in comments that were removed by the Hosts. You just see what may be the bare bones after something has been edited and left. I think you were rude to me in your initial comment. I don't think that I was rude back, just stating facts. You think that you weren't rude to me in your comment, but that I was rude back. As I said, it is in the eye of the beholder.

  • 38. Re: 16gb iphone only has 13.09 gb capacity on itunes?
    DJG77 Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)

    I was by no means rude in my initial reply to you.

     

    My replies after my second reply were definitely more scathing because your tone was still to be insulting.but my first two replies were perfectly polite. All of your replies were rude, including calling me a troll after my second polite reply, so naturally I stopped being polite at that point.

     

    No I don't know about the poster, and yes there are things i probably missed but that is where when asked why you called the person a troll for just stating an opinion, you could have simply advised you'd had issues with them before. Instead you told me I obviously couldn't read, which really wasn't very polite.

     

    There are ways of explaining things to someone and had you just been more polite instead of patronising I would have happily accepted your answer without further question.

  • 39. Re: 16gb iphone only has 13.09 gb capacity on itunes?
    DJG77 Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)

    How about we just agree to disagree and leave it there.

     

    There's no point us going on about it, we both have our opinion and we're strong in that opionion, so we're going round in circles aren't we.

     

    I'm sure we've both got better things to be doing with our time!

1 2 3 Previous Next