Skip navigation

Pages 5 features checklist

139858 Views 1,500 Replies Latest reply: Apr 15, 2014 2:45 PM by PeterBreis0807 RSS Branched to a new discussion.
  • Peggy Level 8 Level 8 (38,085 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 3, 2013 4:51 PM (in response to Hirschkorn)

    Hirschkorn wrote:

     

    "As long as I can" means that, even after Apple abandons version 4.3, I'll install Mountain Lion (or Mavericks) in a virtual machine like VMware or Parallels and I'll still be able to use the old - but useful - version.

    Or as I have done for AppleWorks, I've kept another Mac running Snow Leopard that I can access via screen sharing for those times I need to use it. I also have an older PPC iMac running Tiger for running Classic apps.

     

    Peggy_sig.png

  • enteecee Level 2 Level 2 (315 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 3, 2013 8:39 PM (in response to jSimon0202)

    jSimon0202 wrote:

     

    Am I foolish for hoping for a "New Coke/Coke Classic" ending?

     

    There are obviously a few of us unhappy with the change. Is that number large enough to make Apple even flinch and reconsider...

    Any chance they will break off Pages 4.3 under a new name as mac based software for the specialist not the ios masses?

     

    Do we think there is a chance Apple will make a statement about future direction for those of us who need a robust, Mac based, word processor and DTP?

     

    They're NOT going to go back to the Pages 4.3 files- they've done this in order to build a new file type that gets them the benefits they want (cross-platform).

     

    The best we can hope for is speedy implememntation of in the new version of the features we need.

    The best way to get that is to leave plenty of feedback here:

    http://www.apple.com/feedback/pages.html

     

    I even left feedback pleadingfor SOME indication of their future plans.

     

    Good luck- we're alltryign to figure out next steps.

  • bugs123 Calculating status...
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 3, 2013 9:40 PM (in response to PeterBreis0807)

    i note also the links have been cut in pages 09 for video tutorials ( removed ? ) and there are none i can find in pages 5  ----- this visual help was very useful compared to the new help. The omission / removal of mail marge is a disaster for many.

  • crumvoc Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 3, 2013 9:40 PM (in response to PeterBreis0807)

    I have sent the following message to the Apple Feedback site:

     

    I am a small business owner that uses about a half-dozen Macs in my business for wordprocessing primarily.  These machines are of various vintages. Some cannot use Mavericks and therefore cannot use Pages 5.  Since it is impossible to have a mixed system that uses both Pages 4 and Pages 5 because there is no interoperability, over the last two days, I have had to convert roughly 500 of my 5000 Pages 4.3 documents to a Microsoft Word format and I have now switched, at least for the time being, to Nisus Writer Pro, which involved more expense.  I have exclusively used Pages for my business since 2006.  I have attempted to use pages 5 and it is completely inadequate for my purposes. I am very disappointed with the situation. Apple needs to tell it's commercial users what to expect now and in the future regarding pages. 

  • oliverj Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 4, 2013 12:42 PM (in response to py99ajh)

    Perhaps Pages 4.0's strongest feature was style management and losing the Styles drawer is mildly depressing.  I didn't want to go back to Word, but I can't seem to figure out a workflow that allows me to do proper Style assignment for documents longer than a few pages.

     

    Overall, it looks like they are planning on making Pages more like TextEdit (lightweight app for your grandparents), rather than a professional tool that I was hoping it would be.  Economically, I get it, but what a shame.

     

    Here's crossing my fingers (naively) for a Pages Pro version...

  • rkimball Level 1 Level 1 (105 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 4, 2013 1:46 PM (in response to oliverj)

    TextEdit is a great product!  Pages 5, on the other hand . . . .

  • John Bull Calculating status...
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 4, 2013 2:13 PM (in response to crumvoc)

    Screen Shot 2013-11-04 at 22.06.21.png

     

     

    Very well said, crumvoc. I admire your way of putting your case. I don't think I could be that level headed at present... I'm still too angry.

  • kevmur Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 4, 2013 2:21 PM (in response to John Bull)

    Apple = silence. Wish they woud tell us what they intend to do.

  • crumvoc Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 4, 2013 2:47 PM (in response to PeterBreis0807)

    On the app store, you can hit the flippy triangle and discover what the rating is for all versions of Pages. As of yesterday, by subtracting out the current version ratings, I found the following ratings for the previous versions:


    1 - 2 stars 15%

    3 stars 9%

    4 - 5 stars 75%

     

    CURRENT Ratings for Pages 5:

    1-2 stars     69.3%

    3 stars       6.4%

    4-5 stars     24.16%


    Apple improved Pages by introducing 5.0 such that the ratings for the product have essentially completely reversed. Before it was rated as a very good product. Now it is rated as a very bad product. Nice going Apple! Thats makin' progress and keepin' the customers happy!

  • israfelli Level 1 Level 1 (0 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 4, 2013 6:36 PM (in response to crumvoc)

    It's very important to add your review to the app store if you haven't yet. Apple might listen to us if the rating average continues to slide down. Pages 5 currently rates two stars. The average for all versions is now 3 stars, a slip from 3.5.

     

    Please rate Pages, it might be the only way we have a shot at getting the features back that we need.

  • enteecee Level 2 Level 2 (315 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 4, 2013 6:58 PM (in response to crumvoc)

    At this point, I have to wonder whether Apple kept the names of the iWorks apps, rather than introducing them as the new products that they are, in part so that the largely positive ratings for old versions would prop up ratings that they knew wouldn't be so strong.

     

    I'm also kind of shocked that they're getting 24% positive ratings.

     

    And has anybody else notived tha tthe top reviews ranked as "most helpful" haven't changed in days... and are more positive than the consensus- even though they have very little content?

    "Thanks for the Arabic support!" is not what I would guess would be rated the MOST helpful review for days on end.

  • Magnus Lewan Level 4 Level 4 (3,655 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 4, 2013 7:33 PM (in response to PeterBreis0807)

    PeterBreis0807 wrote:

     

    enteecee

     

    Apple has deliberately planned on acquiring a flood of new users, who have never had the iWork apps ever so can't compare. They will be just grateful for the free App. Like "toothpick" food in supermarkets, it may be unpalatable rubbish, and may not even get consumed, but people won't criticise the "gift".

     

    This has been the way they have kept on top since OSX was introduced. There are an enormous number of people who have never known better or even thought about it. They are reinforced by those who should know better but just bend under the yoke of "This best of all possible worlds".

     

    I also suspect they are also "Managing Consent" from behind the curtains. It would be hard not to, when nobody is really watching.

     

    The compliant Apple press is so firmly embedded in the Apple ecosphere they can be relied on to self-censor and bend the story without direction from above. Hence the totally unsubstantiated and patently untrue statements of "many" and "most" Pages users welcoming the new App.

     

    To be fair, Peter, the reaction would have been similar if they had gone the other way. I can imagine if Apple had gone from 5.0 to 4.3, with millions of Japanese, Arabic and Hebrew users. Something like:

     

    "How can they remove phonetic guides? They just made it impossible to use the product for everyone in Japan! And they add Mail merge! Who on earth uses such a thing!? Linked text boxes? Why waste resources on that? This is a word processor - not a toy layout program. Let's all go to the Apple Store and vote down the new version as completely unusable."

     

    Leaving the existing users behind is always bad, no matter what it is that is removed.

  • pinkuff Level 1 Level 1 (25 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 5, 2013 2:51 AM (in response to crumvoc)

    Very interesting - crossposting to Facebook

     

    crumvoc wrote:

     

    On the app store, you can hit the flippy triangle and discover what the rating is for all versions of Pages. As of yesterday, by subtracting out the current version ratings, I found the following ratings for the previous versions:


    1 - 2 stars 15%

    3 stars 9%

    4 - 5 stars 75%

     

    CURRENT Ratings for Pages 5:

    1-2 stars     69.3%

    3 stars       6.4%

    4-5 stars     24.16%


    Apple improved Pages by introducing 5.0 such that the ratings for the product have essentially completely reversed. Before it was rated as a very good product. Now it is rated as a very bad product. Nice going Apple! Thats makin' progress and keepin' the customers happy!

    https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=171435656389475&id=16928333327 1374

1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 ... 101 Previous Next

Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (37)

Legend

  • This solved my question - 10 points
  • This helped me - 5 points
This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.