RPbySC

Q: does aperture 3.5 support RAW for Olympus E-M1

Does Aperture 3.5 support RAW for the new Olympus E-M! camera yet?

Thanks

Aperture 3, OS X Mavericks (10.9)

Posted on Nov 13, 2013 4:17 PM

Close

Q: does aperture 3.5 support RAW for Olympus E-M1

  • All replies
  • Helpful answers

  • by William Lloyd,

    William Lloyd William Lloyd Nov 13, 2013 6:17 PM in response to RPbySC
    Level 7 (21,148 points)
    Nov 13, 2013 6:17 PM in response to RPbySC

    I don't believe so.

     

    Here are the supported formats:

     

    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5955

  • by RPbySC,

    RPbySC RPbySC Nov 14, 2013 4:51 PM in response to William Lloyd
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Nov 14, 2013 4:51 PM in response to William Lloyd

    Thank you.  I wonder when it will be?  I have the new camera and would like to edit RAW photos in Aperture.  Adobe has already added support.

  • by William Lloyd,Helpful

    William Lloyd William Lloyd Nov 14, 2013 5:08 PM in response to RPbySC
    Level 7 (21,148 points)
    Nov 14, 2013 5:08 PM in response to RPbySC

    Nobody here knows.  On the bright side, Apple seems to be much quicker with raw support for cameras these days than in the past.

  • by saadiq,Helpful

    saadiq saadiq Dec 18, 2013 6:02 PM in response to RPbySC
    Level 1 (15 points)
    Dec 18, 2013 6:02 PM in response to RPbySC

    It does as of today with the latest update.

  • by RPbySC,

    RPbySC RPbySC Dec 18, 2013 6:06 PM in response to saadiq
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Dec 18, 2013 6:06 PM in response to saadiq

    Woo Hoo!  Thanks for letting us know!

  • by Michele Marcolin,

    Michele Marcolin Michele Marcolin Dec 31, 2013 12:42 PM in response to RPbySC
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Dec 31, 2013 12:42 PM in response to RPbySC

    Why is EM-1 RAW compatibility NOT installable on OS 10.7.5...! ONLY OS 10.8 and 10.9...!!

    You just force people to change programs. I have no intention of wrecking up my machine installing a new OS, with all the **** breaking loose that the thing usually implies...

  • by léonie,

    léonie léonie Dec 31, 2013 1:14 PM in response to Michele Marcolin
    Level 10 (106,848 points)
    iLife
    Dec 31, 2013 1:14 PM in response to Michele Marcolin

    I have no intention of wrecking up my machine installing a new OS, with all the **** breaking loose that the thing usually implies...

    The upgrade from Lion to Mountain Lion brings many improvements and less radical changes than the upgrade from Snow Leopard to Lion. Mt. Lion is the better Lion.

  • by Michele Marcolin,

    Michele Marcolin Michele Marcolin Dec 31, 2013 3:13 PM in response to léonie
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Dec 31, 2013 3:13 PM in response to léonie

    I work with my machine and get paid to delievr on time with it. I can't take chances with delays or reinstallations.

    In any case every machine is fit with the System it comes with. Sometimes a newer version fits it and brings some good. Most of time it has side-issues. And you have to download a bulk of stuff... which requires time again.

  • by léonie,

    léonie léonie Dec 31, 2013 4:39 PM in response to Michele Marcolin
    Level 10 (106,848 points)
    iLife
    Dec 31, 2013 4:39 PM in response to Michele Marcolin

    I understand, why you are cautious with updates and do not want to jump on the bandwaggon, since you need to keep your equipment working. The upgrade to Mt. Lion is worth it. It makes Lion more usuable.

     

    Why is EM-1 RAW compatibility NOT installable on OS 10.7.5...!

    SInce Lion has Apple changed the raw support strategy. Raw support is now part of the operating system and no longer an update to the applications. Apple did not say why, we can only speculate - but this new strategy makes it possible to write the raw support, so that it will profit from the better support for multi kernel processors in the newer systems, so that raw developement can be computed more efficiently on the new MacPros.