-
All replies
-
Helpful answers
-
Dec 21, 2013 3:09 AM in response to sunefromsmørumby Yellowbox,Hi sune,
As far as I know, Numbers has always had the ability to sort rows. Numbers 3.0.1 has lost the abilty to sort only some rows within a table, but there are ways to work around this. In the meantime, we must wait for Apple to re-instate Multi-column and range sort (and other features):
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6049
Please reply with a description of what you are trying to do.
Regards,
Ian.
-
Dec 21, 2013 3:16 AM in response to Yellowboxby sunefromsmørum,Thank you Ian,
Let's say I want to sort e.g. rows 11 - 14 - based on dates in column 1.
In Numbers 09 - it was simple - I just chosed the rows and sort in the organizer.
All the best,
Sune
-
Dec 21, 2013 4:14 AM in response to sunefromsmørumby Yellowbox,★HelpfulHi Sune,
While we all wait for Apple to put this feature back in another update of Numbers 3, try this:
You want to sort rows 11-14 (as an example). Add a Colour Fill to row 15 as a guide for later.
Select rows 11-14. Click and *hold* on any Row Reference Tab. You will see the selected rows appear to 'lift'. Drag those rows away from Table 1 to a blank part of the 'canvas':
and they will form a new table. Sort this table.
Then select all rows of Table 2, and Copy.
Click on Table 1. Select the colour filled row where you want to insert (row showing 23 Jun 2013 in this example).
Menu > Insert > Copied Rows.
Not as easy as Numbers 2.3 Reorganize Panel, but a workaround.
If you frequently resort the same rows, consider placing them in their own table.
Regards,
Ian.
-
Dec 21, 2013 4:20 AM in response to Yellowboxby sunefromsmørum,Thank you Ian - again,
That's a smart, creative and tricky solutuion!
I can now see what creative thinking can do - thank you.
Thank you - all the best regards,
Sune
-
Dec 21, 2013 4:29 AM in response to sunefromsmørumby Yellowbox,Hi Sune,
Happy Numbering!
Regards,
Ian
-
Dec 21, 2013 5:37 AM in response to Yellowboxby Badunit,★HelpfulAnother feature that I wish they changed for the worse was the ability to select all the rows/columns of a table and insert them into another table. You used to be able to lift rows from a table, do what you needed with them as another table, then put lift them and put them back into the original table without having to copy/"insert copied rows" or delete a leftover table. Now you cannot lift every row/column of a table so you cannot simply slide the rows back where they came from as you could in '09.
-
Dec 21, 2013 12:25 PM in response to Badunitby Barry,@Badunit
Can you
- lift the rows you want to work on from the original table
- do what you need with thes rows as another table
- add a row or two to this 'other' table so that the lifted and worked on rows are no longer the 'whole' table
- lift the altered rows (now only 'part' of the table)
- put them back in the original table.
- select what's left of the 'other' table and press delete
Not quite as convenient, but is it workable?
Regards,
Barry
-
Dec 21, 2013 1:23 PM in response to Barryby Badunit,Barry,
First let me clarify my original statement. I don't "wish they changed for the worse". I must have typed something else first (such as "I wish they would put back in") and changed it. It should be "...they changed for the worse..."
Yes, you can add a row, put the other rows back where they belong, then delete the leftover table. That's what I've been doing but it is two extra steps that should be unnecessary. It worked better in '09.


