BBoiss wrote:
I'll go ahead and give the google search a go. I'm still a little bit fuzzy on which point you are leaning towards though. In one instance you reference the OS update attributing to this, but then you are also making reference to a "batch". So for my full understanding, are you not saying this was a hardware batch?
Oh and it seems we missed each other on my explanation.
Get help with iOS update and restore errors - Apple Support
Scroll to the bottom and you will see some of the various hardware error codes you can find yourself staring at if after an update, restore, or recovery the checklist finds something amiss that it deems can not be utilized.
Oh and these. These are always my favorites.
If you see error 9, 4005, 4013, or 4014 when you restore your iOS device - Apple Support
I am reserving judgement. As I am not privy to all the data, and never will be as on Apple can collect it and will never reveal it, I can only go by the apparent numbers indicated by how many folks may have found their way to my eyeballs in these two threads - as I said before, I have no dog in it so I am just curious and playing a bit of "gatekeeper" in trying to keep folks focuesed on what will get their issue solved, not cast blame. My best estimation based on the anecdotal data seems to point toward a goodly number, but not statistically relevant, of iPhones affected - both previously held and provided as replacements, paid or free, that develop this issue when iOS 9.3.1 is applied.
2 + 2 = 4 --- hardware unique + software unique = problem === it does not make sense that a StuxNet-like event could occur on a machine with no significant moving parts, but if it walks like a duck...
So yes, a batch of devices are affected by a software update to produce a particular failure is the only logical conclusion. The batch is statistically small when compared to the installed base of 60 million, but large enough to draw attention here. One must extrapolate that there are 1000s in reality as this forum is also not a statistically significant sample. Here is a sample of a sample of a sample - a stretch, but all we have to go on.
I have also said that with samples this "small", Apple deals with them "quietly" on a case-by-case basis. Good business public relations is not always all that "public"
regarding your fine articles - there are many reports of Apple article steps having no effect (not sure that error codes even play into a screen being unresponsive)
another big "tell" is shaking, flexing temporarily fixes it. There is a standing joke that there is a magic machine in the tech bench area that precisely applies pressure or whacks devices and fixes problems - the bench techs claimed it exists (tongue firmly in cheek?) to a fellow member here (he believes what I do... they merely whack it gently until it works then hand it back - which is exactly what users here report as effective temporarily!