HT204655: Updating from iPhoto to Photos for OS X
Learn about Updating from iPhoto to Photos for OS X
-
All replies
-
Helpful answers
-
Sep 12, 2015 10:33 PM in response to dgfromcpkby albertfromberkeley,I can not even tweak my photos so that they can be printed on my Canon Printer.Is there any way to get my old iPhoto 7 back??Anyway?
And are there are programs that will allow me to use it like a "darkroom".The IOS 7 program did the job just great,just great but this new on in Yosemite is simply horrible.
-
Sep 13, 2015 12:25 AM in response to albertfromberkeleyby petermac87,Yyou are confusing iOS and OSX. But you can erase your drive and reinstall the backup you made prior to upgrading. As for your second question, I like Lightroom by Adobe, but there are many others if you search.
Cheers
Pete
-
by Terence Devlin,Sep 13, 2015 2:04 AM in response to albertfromberkeley
Terence Devlin
Sep 13, 2015 2:04 AM
in response to albertfromberkeley
Level 10 (139,500 points)
iLifeI can not even tweak my photos so that they can be printed on my Canon Printer.
Well it's not difficult for everyone else, where is it going wrong for you?
And are there are programs that will allow me to use it like a "darkroom"
What's "it"?
-
Jun 17, 2016 10:48 AM in response to Foremost authorityby ariddel,I agree - why can't the photos just be in a folder. It seems like I have to beg Apple access to my own **** photos! Maddening!
-
Jun 17, 2016 11:18 AM in response to dgfromcpkby Terence Devlin,You're photos can be just in a folder. If you want that, why are you using Photos? Why not just use folders? It's not compulsory you know.
-
Jun 17, 2016 1:00 PM in response to ariddelby babowa,I've always had my photos in a folder in my Documents folder. Many subfolders (such as beachtrip 2015, Xmas,etc) to organize them. Simple to drag the folder to an external drive for an extra backup - no library to update or whatever.
-
Jun 17, 2016 2:06 PM in response to ariddelby LarryHN,You can but not if you choose to use Photos - there are many, many many advantages to using Photos but nothin about it is mandatory - if you choose to use it then you have to use it the way it works and it only works if you import your photos to its library 0 if you want to use folders then use Preview or the finder to view your photos - they are file orientated viewers - Photos is not LN -
Jun 17, 2016 2:47 PM in response to LarryHNby babowa,Well, I've used Photos (to try its' edit capabilities) without using its' library - the same way I use Aperture: I import the photo, edit it, and export it. Then I put everything in Photos/Aperture in the trash and empty it. The edited/exported version is filed in its proper place, sometimes along with the original or replacing it.
-
Jun 17, 2016 3:06 PM in response to babowaby Terence Devlin,It's semantics I know, but that is using the Library. You need to import first then export after, everything happens in the Library. Like Aperture and iPhoto (and other apps with non-destructive processing like LIghtroom) It simply cannot operate on an photo that is not in the Library.
-
Jun 17, 2016 3:24 PM in response to Terence Devlinby babowa,Okay, but - at the end of the day (or when I'm done editing, exporting, and emptying the trash), there is nothing in the library......
-
Jun 17, 2016 4:44 PM in response to babowaby Terence Devlin,Sure, my point was to clarify it for the other poster.
-
-
Aug 16, 2016 4:00 PM in response to dgfromcpkby philkdc,Never use it. There's less than meets the eye!
-
Aug 18, 2016 2:41 PM in response to dgfromcpkby John Anthony,I'm not too thrilled about it either however, the more time I spend with it the better it gets. I had gotten used to Aperture and Photos seemed like a real mess at first. Making photo books in Aperture gave more control over labeling pictures in the books. For example, I could assign a text field to each and every picture if I so desired. In Photos I can only assign one line of text at the bottom of the page. If there is indeed a way to do this now in Photos the feature has become too obscure to find. I hope they improve the program as time goes on.
-
Aug 18, 2016 2:55 PM in response to John Anthonyby LarryHN,Photos is a great consumer program but it clearly is not a professional program like Aperture (or LightRoom, etc) and does not cost what they do - for consumers it is a big improvement over iPhoto but for advanced amateurs and professionals it simply is not a professional program and is not advertised as one nor is it intended to be one - it is intended to support the world's most popular camera - the iPhone and enhance use of it with IOS devices and Macs to sell more IOS devices and iPhones
I wish Apple had continues the professional path but they have not - a business decision on their part
LN