Inquisitor-LSL

Q: El Capitan OS X 10.11.6 (15G31) - Mail High CPU

Since upgrading to El Capitan OS X 10.11.6 (15G31), Mail is consuming high CPU cycles typically 180-200% CPU on Octo-core Mac Pro 5.1 workstation (consequently have had to turn fans up ~ smcFanControl, as everything was getting really HOT). Appears to be same/similar issue to what was experienced previously with El Capitan OS X 10.11, I know this issue was fixed patched at El Capitan OS X 10.11.1 (appears now broken). I am not running Avast Antivirus (known previous incompatibility). Any and all constructive help/suggestions to overcome issue from the support forum welcome (prior to having to file ticket with Apple). Thanks Inquisitor

Mac Pro (Mid 2010), OS X El Capitan (10.11.6), Intel Octo-Core

Posted on Jul 20, 2016 9:32 AM

Close

Q: El Capitan OS X 10.11.6 (15G31) - Mail High CPU

  • All replies
  • Helpful answers

Previous Page 2
  • by Csound1,Helpful

    Csound1 Csound1 Jul 20, 2016 10:41 AM in response to Inquisitor-LSL
    Level 9 (50,439 points)
    Desktops
    Jul 20, 2016 10:41 AM in response to Inquisitor-LSL

    Safe mode takes a while to start, wait.

  • by Inquisitor-LSL,

    Inquisitor-LSL Inquisitor-LSL Jul 20, 2016 10:40 AM in response to Csound1
    Level 1 (18 points)
    Mac OS X
    Jul 20, 2016 10:40 AM in response to Csound1

    So once in Safe Boot concluded and desktop shown, with Activity Monitor open I started Mail, initially spiked to 70-100% then shortly afterwards fell back to a Max steady state CPU consumption of 0.3%.

     

    After running Safe Boot for 10 minutes, I rebooted (normal boot), opened Activity Monitor then started Mail, back to 180-260% CPU.

  • by Csound1,

    Csound1 Csound1 Jul 20, 2016 10:46 AM in response to Inquisitor-LSL
    Level 9 (50,439 points)
    Desktops
    Jul 20, 2016 10:46 AM in response to Inquisitor-LSL

    That confirms that it is something you have installed that is causing it. Update everything until your software is all compatible with ElCap, all 3rd party items are suspect, Trusteer is plain awful so get rid of it (correctly). It's going to take a while, be patient.

  • by Linc Davis,

    Linc Davis Linc Davis Jul 20, 2016 11:43 AM in response to Inquisitor-LSL
    Level 10 (207,963 points)
    Applications
    Jul 20, 2016 11:43 AM in response to Inquisitor-LSL

    1. This procedure is a diagnostic test. It changes nothing, for better or worse, and therefore will not, in itself, solve the problem. But with the aid of the test results, the solution may take a few minutes, instead of hours or days.

    The test works on OS X 10.8 ("Mountain Lion") and later. I don't recommend running it on older versions of OS X. It will do no harm, but it won't do much good either.

    Don't be put off by the complexity of these instructions. The procedure is easy to do right, but it's also easy to do wrong, so I've made the instructions very detailed. You do harder tasks with the computer all the time.

    2. If you don't already have a current backup, please back up all data before doing anything else. The backup is necessary on general principle, not because of anything in the test procedure. Backup is always a must, and when you're having any kind of trouble with the computer, you may be at higher than usual risk of losing data, whether you follow these instructions or not.

    There are ways to back up a computer that isn't fully functional. Ask if you need guidance.

    3. Below are instructions to run a UNIX shell script, a type of program. As I wrote above, it changes nothing. It doesn't send or receive any data on the network. All it does is to generate a human-readable report on the state of the computer. That report goes nowhere unless you choose to share it. If you prefer, you can act on it yourself without disclosing the contents to me or anyone else.

    You should be wondering whether you can believe me, and whether it's safe to run a program at the behest of a stranger. In general, no, it's not safe and I don't encourage it.

    In this case, however, there are ways for you to decide whether the program is safe without having to trust me. First, you can read it. Unlike an application that you download and click to run, it's transparent, so anyone who understands the code can verify what it does.

    You may not be able to understand the script yourself. But variations of it have been posted on this website many times over a period of years. Any one of the millions of registered users could have read the script and raised the alarm if it was harmful. Then I would not be here now and you would not be reading this message. See, for example, this discussion.

    Nevertheless, if you can't satisfy yourself that these instructions are safe, don't follow them. Ask for other options.

    4. Here's a general summary of what you need to do, if you choose to proceed:

    ☞ Copy the text of a particular web page (not this one) to the Clipboard.

    ☞ Paste into the window of another application.

    ☞ Wait for the test to run. It usually takes a few minutes.

    ☞ Paste the results, which will have been copied automatically, back into a reply on this page.

    These are not specific instructions; just an overview. The details are in parts 7 and 8 of this comment. The sequence is: copy, paste, wait, paste again. You don't need to copy a second time.

    5. Try to test under conditions that reproduce the problem, as far as possible. For example, if the computer is intermittently slow, run the test during a slowdown.

    You may have started up in safe mode. If the system is now in safe mode and works well enough in normal mode to run the test, restart as usual before running it. If you can only test in safe mode, do that.

    6. If you have more than one user, and only one user is affected by the problem,, and the affected user is not an administrator, then please run the test twice: once while logged in as the affected user, and once as an administrator. The results may be different. The user that is created automatically on a new computer when you start it for the first time is an administrator. If you can't log in as an administrator, test as the affected user. Most personal Macs have only one user, and in that case this section doesn’t apply. Don't log in as root.

    7. Load this linked web page (on the website "GitHub") in Safari. Press the key combination command-A to select all the text, then copy it to the Clipboard by pressing command-C.

    8. Launch the built-in Terminal application in any one of the following ways:

    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name ("Terminal") into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)

    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.

    ☞ Open LaunchPad and start typing the name.

    Click anywhere in the Terminal window to activate it. Paste from the Clipboard into the window by pressing command-V, then press return. The text you pasted should vanish immediately.

    9. If you're logged in as an administrator, you'll be prompted for your login password. Nothing will be displayed when you type it. You will not see the usual dots in place of typed characters. Make sure caps lock is off. Type carefully and then press return. You may get a one-time warning to be careful. If you make three failed attempts to enter the password, the test will run anyway, but it will produce less information. If you don't know the password, or if you prefer not to enter it, just press return three times at the password prompt. Again, the script will still run.

    If the test is taking much longer than usual to run because the computer is very slow, you might be prompted for your password a second time. The authorization that you grant by entering it expires automatically after five minutes.

    If you're not logged in as an administrator, you won't be prompted for a password. The test will still run. It just won't do anything that requires administrator privileges.

    10. The test may take a few minutes to run, depending on how many files you have and the speed of the computer. A computer that's abnormally slow may take longer to run the test. While it's running, a series of lines will appear in the Terminal window like this:

       Test started
      Part 1 of 4 done at: … sec
      …
      Part 4 of 4 done at: … sec
      The test results are on the Clipboard.
       Please close this window.

    The intervals between parts won't be exactly equal, but they give a rough indication of progress.

    Wait for the final message "Please close this window" to appear—again, usually within a few minutes. If you don't see that message within about 30 minutes, the test probably won't complete in a reasonable time. In that case, press the key combination control-C or command-period to stop it. Then go to the next step. You'll have incomplete results, but still something.

    In order to get results, the test must either be allowed to complete or else manually stopped as above. If you close the Terminal window while the test is still running, the partial results won't be saved.

    11. When the test is complete, or if you stopped it manually, quit Terminal. The results will have been saved to the Clipboard automatically. They are not shown in the Terminal window. Please don't copy anything from there. All you have to do is start a reply to this comment and then paste by pressing command-V again.

    At the top of the results, there will be a line that begins with the words "Start time." If you don't see that, but instead see a mass of gibberish, you didn't wait for the "close this window" message. Please wait for it and try again.

    If any private information, such as your name or email address, appears in the results, anonymize it before posting. Usually that won't be necessary.

    12. When you post the results, you might see an error message on the web page: "You have included content in your post that is not permitted," or "The message contains invalid characters." That's a bug in the software that runs this website. Please post the test results on Pastebin, then post a link here to the page you created.

    If you have an account on Pastebin, please don't select Private from the Paste Exposure menu on the page, because then no one but you will be able to see it.

    13. When you're done with the test, it's gone. There is nothing to uninstall or clean up.

    14. This is a public forum, and others may give you advice based on the results of the test. They speak for themselves, not for me. The test itself is harmless, but whatever else you do may not be. For others who choose to run it, I don't recommend that you post the test results on this website unless I asked you to.

    15. The linked UNIX shell script bears a notice of copyright. Readers of ASC may copy it for their own personal use. Neither the whole nor any part may be redistributed.

  • by Lexiepex,

    Lexiepex Lexiepex Jul 20, 2016 1:06 PM in response to Inquisitor-LSL
    Level 6 (10,477 points)
    Mac OS X
    Jul 20, 2016 1:06 PM in response to Inquisitor-LSL

    id you already try this:

    uninstall Trusteer.

    reindex spotlight.

  • by Eric Root,

    Eric Root Eric Root Jul 20, 2016 1:51 PM in response to Inquisitor-LSL
    Level 9 (71,376 points)
    iTunes
    Jul 20, 2016 1:51 PM in response to Inquisitor-LSL
  • by Inquisitor-LSL,

    Inquisitor-LSL Inquisitor-LSL Jul 20, 2016 3:13 PM in response to Eric Root
    Level 1 (18 points)
    Mac OS X
    Jul 20, 2016 3:13 PM in response to Eric Root

    All

     

    So after 'properly' uninstalling Trusteer Rapport and reboot = No Change.

     

    Deleted and rebuilt Spotlight (using Onyx) and reboot = No Change.

     

    Then I recalled back to 10.11 days when Mail bug consumed High CPU, one of the work arounds for some folks was to delete mail accounts and rebuild/reinstate (assuming emails were still stored/hosted from imap/pop3 server). So I deleted my email accounts one by one leaving 5-10 minutes between each and monitoring Activity Monitor to see what change occurred = No real change.

     

    So then I signed out of iCloud, waited a moment then Signed back in, which added back my email accounts within Mail = SUCCESS Low Low CPU Mail consumption. Okay one of my accounts does have 16Gb of mail, so took a little while to reinstate

     

    I'll monitor over next fews days/week to see if things revert back, but at the present time (after some hours running) no excessive CPU consumption, just ticking along.

     

    I wonder if there is any connect to a) Mail having to upgrade mail databases after 10.11.6 install, perhaps something got fried, b) Some connection with iCloud????

     

    Big Thank You to all contributors, Regards Inquisitor

  • by Lexiepex,Helpful

    Lexiepex Lexiepex Jul 21, 2016 8:23 AM in response to Inquisitor-LSL
    Level 6 (10,477 points)
    Mac OS X
    Jul 21, 2016 8:23 AM in response to Inquisitor-LSL

    Good work.

    Don't let Trusteer come back.

    Very good idea to get out of iCloud for a moment, I now remember that it solved the same  issue in another thread, it was recommended by Linc Davis then.

    Thanks for informing us,

    Lex

  • by phillipfromalbany,

    phillipfromalbany phillipfromalbany Aug 2, 2016 11:41 AM in response to Inquisitor-LSL
    Level 1 (4 points)
    Aug 2, 2016 11:41 AM in response to Inquisitor-LSL

    I have noticed this same problem with my MacPro Late 2013 model. When I upgraded my OS to 10.11.6 I noticed that my 8-core MacPro was constantly running "launchd, UserEventAgent", using 200% of CPU cycles (2 cores) continuously. There were several apps that were constantly stopping with abnormal code: 1 and then restarting, but the three main culprits were "org.smb.nmbd", "org.postfix.master", and "com.twonky.server.tsuninstall" according to the Console app.

     

    After trying to stop this behavior, I finally reinitialized and reinstalled an older version of MacOs (10.11.5) to fix this problem.

Previous Page 2