Skip navigation

Snow Leopard means no more Appletalk

191332 Views 194 Replies Latest reply: Jun 12, 2013 1:41 PM by Grant Bennet-Alder RSS
1 2 3 ... 13 Previous Next
John Galt Level 7 Level 7 (33,100 points)
Currently Being Moderated
Jul 7, 2009 6:51 AM
This article alleges that the release of Snow Leopard will end support for Appletalk.

Like WDS, it seems Appletalk is a protocol that Apple wishes would just go away on its own. Unfortunately I use it for two of my printers. When Apple discontinues the few lines of code that drive Appletalk, they'll have to add to a landfill's population.

I am not hopeful that anything the user community can do will save this unfortunate victim of progress, but it's worth a try:

http://www.apple.com/feedback/macosx.html
Powerbooks  iMacs  iPods  Airports  Appletalk printers , Mac OS X (10.4.11),  24 years Apple!  "it's" means "it is"  "lose" is a verb  "loose" isn't
  • varjak paw Level 10 Level 10 (167,195 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 7, 2009 7:39 AM (in response to John Galt)
    You can ask, but trust me, Apple's been working to phase out AppleTalk for years, so if they've finally decided to pull the plug, they're not going to change their minds. Most printers that support AppleTalk can also support TCP/IP, and those that can't are now many years old. It's unfortunate that some printers will indeed need to get junked (though I would bet that the number of AppleTalk-only printers still in use with Intel-based Macs are relatively few), but time and technology don't stand still.

    And BTW, AppleTalk is thousands of lines of code, not a "few lines".
    iMac 2.8 Core 2 Duo 24" 4GB ATI 2600, Mac OS X (10.5.7), PowerMac G5 2.0GHz DP, Dell w/ Windows Vista Unlimited SP2, several others VM
  • varjak paw Level 10 Level 10 (167,195 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 7, 2009 9:28 AM (in response to John Galt)
    What's a few thousand lines of code in millions

    Those thousands of lines still involve lots of work.

    The point is that Appletalk works, so why get rid of it?

    Primarily it would be the engineering effort it would take to port AppleTalk to Snow Leopard and develop a 64-bit version. Given that AppleTalk is, as a viable protocol with industry support, dead, I very much doubt that Apple will feel that continued support is worth the cost of continued development and support.

    Again, you can submit your feedback to Apple. But I think the chances are nil.
    iMac 2.8 Core 2 Duo 24" 4GB ATI 2600, Mac OS X (10.5.7), PowerMac G5 2.0GHz DP, Dell w/ Windows Vista Unlimited SP2, several others VM
  • Limnos Level 8 Level 8 (36,585 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 8, 2009 3:50 PM (in response to John Galt)
    I can see both sides of this. I am completely supportive of your stance regarding old equipment. I can also see that it would be a degree of effort to perpetuate some old compatibilities, especially with hardware having changed pretty radically with the advent of Intel Macs. We had to say goodbye to Classic not long ago and this is just a minor repeat.

    I'll tell you a story about a car and let you read into it what you want. I drive a 28 year old Toyota (30 mpg highway!) and haven't bought a car since getting this one used in 1987 -- 22 years ago. After 20 years they don't have to stock parts any more which makes running a 28 year old car even harder. I don't think Toyota as a corporation would be very happy if nobody had bought cars from them in 28 years and are probably relieved with the 20 year policy. I can see that some day something minor but essential like a turn signal relay will break which will basically total an otherwise good car. I'll have to buy a new car and Toyota stockholders will be very, very happy (assuming I buy a Toyota as a replacement) that finally I had to go out and buy another car.
    G4 Quicksilver dual 800 MHz 2x120 GBHDs 1.5GBRAM dual-boot 10.4.11 9.2.2, 2 G3 beiges, IIci
  • Grant Bennet-Alder Level 8 Level 8 (48,110 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 8, 2009 5:25 PM (in response to John Galt)
    These are Postscript level 2 printers that do not support LPR/LPD. All these printers are LocalTalk printers. Except for those marked (Ethernet) they also need a converter from AppleTalk-over-Ethernet to AppleTalk/LocalTalk to print from Macs newer than the Beige G3 and with Mac OS X.

    Personal LaserWriter NTR
    Personal LaserWriter 320
    LaserWriter Select 360
    LaserWriter 4/600 PS

    LaserWriter IIf
    LaserWriter IIg (Ethernet)
    LaserWriter Pro 600
    LaserWriter Pro 630 (Ethernet)

    Apple LaserWriter Printers with Ethernet and Built-in LPD:

    LaserWriter 8500 (Ethernet)
    LaserWriter 12/640 PS (Ethernet)
    Color LaserWriter 12/660 PS (Ethernet)
    Color LaserWriter 12/600 PS (Ethernet)
    LaserWriter 16/600PS (Ethernet)
    LaserWriter Pro 810 (Ethernet)
    Beige G3,G3 B+W,G4/867,G4/dual 1.25 MDD, Mac OS 8.6 or Earlier, and 9.2, 10.4 and Server - LW IIg, LW 4/600, ATalk ImageWriter LQ
  • Grant Bennet-Alder Level 8 Level 8 (48,110 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 8, 2009 5:30 PM (in response to Grant Bennet-Alder)
    These Printers are Postscript level 1 printers that can be identified and used under the Linux-Foundation Postscript level 1 driver. All these printers are AppleTalk/LocalTalk printers.They also need a converter from AppleTalk-over-Ethernet to AppleTalk/LocalTalk to print in Macs without a round serial/LocalTalk port and/or Macs running Mac OS X.

    http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/OpenPrinting/MacOSX/pslevel1#Printers

    LaserWriter
    LaserWriter Plus
    LaserWriter IINT
    LaserWriter IINTX
    Personal LaserWriter NT
    Beige G3,G3 B+W,G4/867,G4/dual 1.25 MDD, Mac OS 8.6 or Earlier, and 9.2, 10.4 and Server - LW IIg, LW 4/600, ATalk ImageWriter LQ
  • Grant Bennet-Alder Level 8 Level 8 (48,110 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 8, 2009 5:32 PM (in response to Grant Bennet-Alder)
    The others that are still viable today are the Appletalk-option-card equipped:

    ImageWriter II
    ImageWriter LQ.

    They also need a converter from AppleTalk-over-Ethernet to AppleTalk/LocalTalk.
    Beige G3,G3 B+W,G4/867,G4/dual 1.25 MDD, Mac OS 8.6 or Earlier, and 9.2, 10.4 and Server - LW IIg, LW 4/600, ATalk ImageWriter LQ
  • Tom Ostertag Calculating status...
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 3, 2009 2:02 PM (in response to Grant Bennet-Alder)
    Grant:

    I have a LaserWriter Pro 630 printer connected to my network. Could you tell me what converter you are talking about?

    "Except for those marked (Ethernet) they also need a converter from AppleTalk-over-Ethernet to AppleTalk/LocalTalk to print from Macs newer than the Beige G3 and with Mac OS X"

    Thanks,

    Tom Ostetag
    MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.7), Networked to a G4 (10.4.11) and a G3 (10.2.8) with a Laserwriter Pro 630 printer
  • varjak paw Level 10 Level 10 (167,195 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 4, 2009 6:58 AM (in response to Tom Ostertag)
    He's talking about devices such as the AsantePrint or the Farallon iPrint. These allow you to connect a LocalTalk-only printer to a Mac that only has Ethernet.

    Regards.
    iMac 2.8 Core 2 Duo 24" 4GB ATI 2600, Mac OS X (10.5.7), PowerMac G5 2.0GHz DP, Dell w/ Windows Vista Unlimited SP2, several others VM
  • Grant Bennet-Alder Level 8 Level 8 (48,110 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 4, 2009 11:10 AM (in response to varjak paw)
    Tom Ostertag-

    Dave is quite right. But your LaserWriter Pro 630 HAS an AAUI Ethernet port (but does not have LPR/LPD) so it can use AppleTalk-over-Ethernet directly, but will not be useable if you convert every Mac you own to 10.6 Snow Leopard.

    If you had at least one Mac still running 10.5 or earlier, you could share that printer with the other computers on your Network and continue to print to it using Printer Sharing. The Mac doing the Sharing would accept print jobs from the other computers as long as it was powered up and running when you wanted to print.
    Beige G3,G3 B+W,G4/867,G4/dual 1.25 MDD, Mac OS 8.6 or Earlier, and 9.2, 10.4 and Server - LW IIg, LW 4/600, ATalk ImageWriter LQ
  • pnkaufman Calculating status...
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 25, 2009 11:48 AM (in response to Grant Bennet-Alder)
    I have a LaserWriter 16/600, which has been the (or one of the) most reliable piece of electronics I've every owned. I'd hate to give it up for OS 10.6, but I also want to get rid of Entourage!! I have a basement full of old Macs (I've kept every Mac I ever owned except for my first Mac SE and my first 68030 box--the latter is still in use by a 3-year old with all those kids programs I bought 15-17 years ago) and they all work, so using an older computer as a print server is an energy-inefficient possibility. What other solutions do I have for an "Apple LaserWriter Printers with Ethernet and Built-in LPD" under OS 10.6?
    MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.7)
  • Cayenne6 Calculating status...
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 25, 2009 12:50 PM (in response to John Galt)
    I picked up an old IBM Thinkpad A30 recently and installed Linux Mint on it. Using netatalk and PAP I was able to print to my old Personal Laserwriter 320 that uses a Farallon Ethermac iPrint LT bridge.

    If I can get Linux to see that printer, it shouldn't be impossible for 10.6 to see it. Netatalk is available for OS X already. http://netatalk.darwinports.com/

    I have several Macs that will still use that old printer and don't want to have to buy a new printer if I decide to use 10.6.

    I'm hoping someone will be able to install netatalk on 10.6 and confirm that it will work. <fingers crossed>
    G4 AGP, Mac OS X (10.4.11)
  • Grant Bennet-Alder Level 8 Level 8 (48,110 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 25, 2009 5:35 PM (in response to pnkaufman)
    Apple LaserWriter Printers with Ethernet and Built-in LPD:

    LaserWriter 8500 (Ethernet)
    LaserWriter 12/640 PS (Ethernet)
    Color LaserWriter 12/660 PS (Ethernet)
    Color LaserWriter 12/600 PS (Ethernet)
    LaserWriter 16/600PS (Ethernet)
    LaserWriter Pro 810 (Ethernet)

    ... can continue to be used in 10.6. Instead of printing with Appletalk, you would print with LPR/LPD. To make the switch, just delete your old printer and add it back as an LPR printer instead. If you wait until 10.6 is in place, that will be the only way to add it back.

    If you have an older printer that does not support LPR on a Mac that still supports AppleTalk, you can use the Sharing Preferences to Share this older printer with the other Macs on your network. After it is Shared, go to another Mac and add an LPR print queue (virtual printer) that forwards the print jobs to the Shared Printer.
    Beige G3,G3 B+W,G4/867,G4/dual 1.25 MDD, Mac OS 8.6 or Earlier, and 9.2, 10.4 and Server - LW IIg, LW 4/600, ATalk ImageWriter LQ
1 2 3 ... 13 Previous Next

Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (2)

This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.