Who is using Blue Ray or HD DVD to backup P2 content?

I need some information on workflow and want to know if anyone is using Blue ray or HD DVD to backup P2 content?

TonyTony

Posted on Jun 27, 2007 11:48 AM

Reply
13 replies

Jun 27, 2007 12:48 PM in response to David S.

Well so far it's a disappointing outlook for productions that need lots of record time as well as stable, accessible and inexpensive archiving for P2.

Have a production "underway" already and looking at a P2 HD camera (HPX-500) vs. tape (HDX-900). Trying to fine a realistic approach to archiving P2 and weighing the need for a DVCPro HD deck.

Man hours spent ingesting and archiving P2 will, in the long run, be greater then the extra cost of the camera.

TonyTony

Jul 2, 2007 12:38 PM in response to Shane Ross

OK, so you back up to a second HD but, how long do expect to hang on to that HD? Will it mount after sitting on the shelve for two years (or more)?

Also do you use the default names from the P2 files (i.e. 001xx, 002xx) or do you rename them on ingest. If you rename them how, are they connected to the back up files. It's not like a tape capture where timecode is all that matters, is it?

How much time does all this take?

As you can see I'm quite skeptical about a tapeless workflow in any environment other than the "last weeks news is worthless" environment.

I'm looking for answers but coming up with questions.

TonyTony

Jul 2, 2007 12:44 PM in response to The TonyTony

Tony:

The technology is still new, and the workflow is still being fleshed out.

Tape backups have long shelf life and are relatively painless.

50 GB blu ray backup will hold about two hours of 720/24pN footage, but encodes take about five hours.

As to shelf life, it depends on the quality of the blank.

From what I've read, good solid brand name quality DVD backups last 20-30 years.

Cheap stuff degrades early. Tape backups seem to be the best of both.

What other questions do you have?

Jul 2, 2007 1:15 PM in response to The TonyTony

how long do expect to hang on to that HD? Will it mount after sitting on the shelve for two years (or more)?

I expect them to last 5-10 years. I mount them periodically to get them spinning. THis is a stop-gap measure until HD DVD and/or Blu-Ray becomes more reasonable.

Also do you use the default names from the P2 files (i.e. 001xx, 002xx) or do you rename them on ingest.

ABSOLUTELY NOT. If I am editing, and lose a drive....the media drive...how would I know what to reconnect? If I renamed 0004FGX.mov to "Jackson rallies his men," how would I know that "JACKSON" was 0004FGX.mov? I have hundreds...THOUSANDS of clips. No, I name AFTER I import, and keep the original clip name in my renaming.

If you rename them how, are they connected to the back up files. It's not like a tape capture where timecode is all that matters, is it?

Via NAME ONLY. This is the bad part of FCP...it doesn't look to tape name (card name in this case) and TC when relinking...it looks to NAME ONLY. Which is bad...which is why I never rename.

How much time does all this take?

Depends on the amount of footage. But a while. From the field drives I back up to G-Raids for the duration of the show, then import into FCP and name. Then when the show is over, I archive to internal drives.

Tapeless is the wave of the future. Panavision records to hard drives in the DPX format (the Star Wars Prequels)...RED records to hard drives, Panasonic to P2 and Firestore...other drive solutions in the works. And I do like my tape, but gotta move where the river takes you.

Shane
User uploaded file

Jul 2, 2007 1:32 PM in response to Shane Ross

Also do you use the default names from the P2 files (i.e. 001xx, 002xx) or do you rename them on ingest.

ABSOLUTELY NOT. If I am editing, and lose a drive....the media drive...how would I know what to reconnect? If I renamed 0004FGX.mov to "Jackson rallies his men," how would I know that "JACKSON" was 0004FGX.mov? I have hundreds...THOUSANDS of clips. No, I name AFTER I import, and keep the original clip name in my renaming.

Do you backup the MXF files or the .mov files.

If you name after import do you mean in FCP so that in the bin it is named "Jackson rallies his men" but in the capture scratch folder it is named 0004FGX.mov

Via NAME ONLY. This is the bad part of FCP...it doesn't look to tape name (card name in this case) and TC when relinking...it looks to NAME ONLY. Which is bad...which is why I never rename.

Agreed the name can be a problem but the name does not matter when using tape, just reel number and timecode.

How much time does all this take?

Depends on the amount of footage. But a while. ...

Isn't a tape workflow were your archive is created as you shoot still more efficient? If time is money then time spent backing up files from card to drive to archive (and back) is an expense no seems to be talking about.

TonyTony



Jul 3, 2007 11:44 AM in response to The TonyTony

I would look at LTO tape drives. The LTO3 (or is it up to LTO4 now?) hold hundreds of Gig of data today and they are fast. In fact, the drives can be had on eBay for a few hundreds of dollars. Most of them have SCSI connectors so they may or may not work in the Mac ( I know they work on the PC ). The people I speak with who know, say the DELL or IBM LTO drives are pretty good for the money. In fact, IBM makes Dell's LTO drives.

Jul 3, 2007 12:41 PM in response to Bob Cozzi

Yes LTO or Super DLT look like possible solutions if coupled with some sort of asset management system (Final Cut Server?) that allows proxies and automated backup and archiving.

At this point I think Shane has convinced me to come over to the darkside and use Hard Drives (aaaaha...noooo) as a stop gap measure until a decision can be made about a SAN storage or Blue Ray/HD-DVD route.

Thanks

TonyTony

Jul 5, 2007 6:45 AM in response to David S.

David,
The technology is still new, and the workflow is still being fleshed out.
This is what everyone is saying, seems like a lot of people are going to be wondering what happen to their footage a year or two from now.

When you say it takes 5 hours to "encode" do you mean write it to the disc? If you backup clips to a blue ray disc are you not just copying files to a data disc?

Tape (DLT) does seem to be the best archive method but retrieval of the files from DLT (even Super DLT) does not really have the flexibility and speed of field tapes (and I assume blue ray discs).

At this point I think Shane has convinced me to come over to the darkside and use Hard Drives (aaaaha...noooo) as a stop gap measure until a decision can be made about an archive system. Possiablily using FC Server and a SAN storage sytem with a archive tape drive backing/archiving everything.

TonyTony

Jul 7, 2007 9:48 PM in response to The TonyTony

For what I've read here, most are using hard disks and then dvd's. Based on my personal experience, you cannot trust hard disks alone. They will faill, especially if you are using RAID 0 for speed... one fails and you'll loose everything. In my case I had the external power supply failed and not the actual drives but it was too late when I discover the true fault.

Since P2's are 8GB (new 16GB now available), you can treat each P2 as a "reel" and back it up to a DVD+R DL if it happens to be greater than 4 GB in size. Even with the availability for the new high-capacity DVDs (HD-DVD & Bluray) the cost still does not make a lot of sense for the individual or small business. I'd love to find a good external data tape drive but what I've found are with outdated interfaces. To add to the madness, DVDs also fail. New expandable/Redundant storage technology look very promising, like the Drobo, but is only USB 2.0.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Who is using Blue Ray or HD DVD to backup P2 content?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.