Powerbook G4 1.67 vs Macbook

About three months ago, I had a chance to buy a 15" Powerbook G4 1.67Ghz (the last Powerbook made with dual layer DVD-burner) for a couple of hundred dollars less than the cheapest macbook. Unfortunately, I took too long to decide whether or not it was worth buying a 1,5 year old computer.
However, I have come across a new opportunity : again, it's one of the last powerbooks made, a 1.67Ghz Powerbook G4 with dual-layer burner, but this time it's a 17" model, even better ! And it's only about €50 (about $68) : more expensive than that last 15" model, and it's in perfect condition and it comes with OS X.4 and iLife 06.
I'm not a power user : I do some light gaming (Warcraft 3, Jedi Knight 2, older games basically), use of iLife (esp. iMovie), some DTP, no heavy stuff so I suppose nothing that needs more than 2Gb of RAM 🙂 .
I was looking into buying a MAcbook when Leopard is released but I don't really NEED leopard (I'm still using Panther on my G4/800 Powermac and my aging Pismo), and I suppose Tiger will still be supported for some years to come. Seeing that this particular machine is 1.5 to 2 years old, I would like to squeeze 3 to possibly even 4 more years out of it. The asking price is €900 (about $1230) - the new Macbook (black) I want will cost me €1450 (about $1985), an entry level MB Pro €1850 (about $2530). I really should compare this PB with a MB Pro but I'm on a budget and can't really afford a Macbook Pro. So I guess this is between this Powerbook or the MAcbook.
Yes, I know the Macbook is a lot faster, but I assume that I will already notice a huge speed boost coming from a 800 G4 Quicksilver Powermac with 1Gb of RAM and a crappy 32Mb Radeon 7500, wouldn't you think ?
What are your thoughts on this ?

G4/800 QS - G3/400 Pismo PB, Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Posted on Sep 7, 2007 6:17 AM

Reply
2 replies

Sep 7, 2007 11:26 AM in response to Rincewind

Rosetta is significantly slower than native applications, that if any applications you have rely on Rosetta, and you don't have enough RAM to counteract that issue, you may have problems with a MacBook. Also games which haven't been updated to be Intel native may not run at all on a MacBook as they are heavily dependent on native GPU drivers to their programmed software. See my FAQ* on migrating to Intel Macs here:

http://www.macmaps.com/macosxnative.html#INTEL

If you are already Intel Mac native on all your applications, I see the only reason for getting a Powerbook over a MacBook is the better graphics processor on the Powerbook and if you have some programs which take advantage of that graphics processor. The MacBook uses a shared memory graphics processor with the hard drive which can be slower than a full fledged hardware 128 MB of VRAM graphics processor.

- * Links to my pages may give me compensation.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Powerbook G4 1.67 vs Macbook

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.