Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

What happens when you calibrate a screen?

Friends,

I have an alu 24" imac and I'm thinking of buying the Spyder3 elite to calibrate the screen. How does the device work? For example, there is a limit to the degree that I can lower the brightness of the screen. Does the software that comes with the unit override that limit? Does the unit and its software somehow work with the monitor's operating software to modify the colors I see to produce a "truer" image? Exactly what does the computer do when I calibrate the screen?

Thanks!

Steve

imac 24" 2.8 4gb, Mac OS X (10.5)

Posted on Nov 26, 2007 4:08 PM

Reply
12 replies

Nov 26, 2007 5:19 PM in response to DC Steve

Well, in rough terms:

The software asks your target settings for gamma, white point and luminance in nits (candela per square metre), depending on the software package you will be asked to adjust the luminance using the brightness controls on your computer at some point while it displays the actual value.

The software then displays colour patches and compares the values issued to the value measured by the Colorimeter (the puck) - it will adjust the graphics cards LUT to correct the values where needed and if possible. Any corrections and deviations are recorded in the ICC profile (a text file with values). If you now assign this profile to the display (System Preferences - Displays - Color), OS X will automatically load the assigned profile data into the LUT on start-up and colour-managed applications saving images will embed information on what you have really been seeing into each file, so other devices can render a truthful reproduction (within their capabilities).

Hope this helps a little...

Nov 26, 2007 8:07 PM in response to DC Steve

Gamma: http://www.normankoren.com/makingfineprints1A.html#Gammabox

A light definition would be the amount of contrast in midtones - the gamma value does not effect pure black or white. For photography and video work you will normally use a gamma of 2.2.

The white point should be D65 (6500 Kelvin) or "native"

Target luminance for print proofing should be between 90 and 120 cd/m2 depending on the ambient light - 90 for a rather dim environment, 120 for normal office lighting - you should not use LCDs in completely dark environments for proofing and, of course there should be no direct light.

LUT = Lookup Table, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLUT

The brightness issue is more delicate with LCDs, as there are two factors involved: the backlight (controlled using the brightness controls) and the voltage applied to the individual sub-pixels (red, green and blue) making up each pixel. The backlight cannot be dimmed any further than the lowest setting of the brightness control - the calibration has no effect on that, it is more or less just a lamp with a dimmer. What the calibration can adjust to some degree, is the luminance level of the individual subpixels. The difficult part here is tweaking the output per pixel without giving up desirable contrast, desirable white and black points and maintaining a smooth rendition of grayscale gradients... there are quite some calculations going on there. As a result - yes, a good calibration software can lower the brightness of a LCD (below the backlight only result) within some limitations. I cannot comment on the Spyder 3 (it is brand new and I have not used it) - I can definitely say that Color Eyes was the only software that could really tame the white 24" iMac (which had similar brightness) - Spyder 2, eyeOne and Huey all failed completely (calibration OK, but still far to bright for print proofing). You could overcome the issue with software tools like Shade, but I cannot comment on the quality of this approach, as I have not tried it.

Nov 27, 2007 3:34 PM in response to DC Steve

If you do not need non-standard target settings (unlikely, unless you deal with e.g. offset printers), I would really try to get a Spyder 2 Express. It is a lot cheaper (where still available) and comes with the same hardware as the Spyder 2 Pro. Getting a Spyder 2 Express plus the Color Eyes software will be more or less the same price as getting the new Spyder 3 Elite and taking the risk of not getting the desired results. Alternatively wait for reliable reports from Spyder 3 users with the 24" iMac - should not take too long before hearing from those. I would not really want to end up buying two pro packages... too expensive.

Dec 2, 2007 9:46 AM in response to DC Steve

Uwe,

I took your suggestion and ordered Spyder2 Express. It worked fairly well, but my printed images did not look like the screen. So I downloaded a trial version of Color Eyes and recalibrated. Wow! Now my screen looks dark and muddy. Plus, everything has a purplish cast. What am I doing wrong? This certainly isn't worth paying for.

Any thoughts?

Steve

Dec 3, 2007 2:27 PM in response to DC Steve

Not sure if there is really a problem - at 120 cd/m2 the screen should look a lot darker than before and your eyes need at least 30 - 60 minutes to get used to a greatly changed profile. Do not make the mistake of calibrating every five minutes if you think something is odd. It might be odd, but it might also be correct. Allow your eyes and brain to adjust to the new profile, then review test images (e.g. the ones that come with the Color Eyes download).

The correct settings for Color Eyes and the 24" iMac should be:
- Calibration Sensor (select the Spyder2)
- Monitor Settings (LCD Brightness Only) DO NOT USE Apple Display - it is for Cinema Displays only!
- Profile Settings (ICC v4, 16bit, Auto-validate)
- White Point Target (D65, 120 cd/m2)
- Gamma Target (L*)
- Black Point Target (Min. Lumincance)

Make sure the monitor is on for at least 60 minutes before calibrating and make sure to use some really black material for calibrating the sensor (e.g. use the cloth that came with the iMac).

Printing is a completely different issue: which software did you use, which printer/paper profile, what was the Color Management setting in the print dialogue? Always make sure colour management in the printer driver is off - for most printers using "No Color Management" and the correct paper profile will work best, but for some consumer printers the "ColorSync" settings works better...

HTH

Message was edited by: Uwe Rueckeshaeuser1, reason: typo

Dec 3, 2007 5:24 PM in response to Uwe Rueckeshaeuser1

Uwe,

Thanks for the reply -- I'll try your suggestions. The point about letting your eyes adjust is one I have seen before and a good one. The purple cast kind of had me fooled, but maybe I'll get used to it, or something like that.

I'm not sure what you mean by using something really black to calibrate the sensor. At what stage of the process do I do that?

Thanks for all your help.

Steve

Dec 3, 2007 7:54 PM in response to Uwe Rueckeshaeuser1

Uwe,

Well, I reran the calibration program. I have the "always calibrate" tab checked in the calibration sensor box but I was not asked to put the colorimeter on a black surface. I inadvertently ran the program with the monitor brightness set to minimum, rather than max; the results are better. I printed a test pic and the image on the screen is a little cooler than the printed image, but they are much closer than before. However, grays tend to remain somewhat purplish. Who knows -- maybe my eyes will adjust by tomorrow.

Steve

What happens when you calibrate a screen?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.