Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Tech Specs for 24" Imac Screen/Comparison

Does anyone have the actual tech specs for the screen itself in reference to the 24" Imac (response time, etc.)

How do you think the screen on the 24" Imac compares to this HP 24" monitor?:

http://www.shopping.hp.com/product/display/display/1/storefronts/RY117AA%2523ABA

Posted on Dec 12, 2007 8:59 PM

Reply
5 replies

Dec 12, 2007 10:10 PM in response to blair.harrington

blair.harrington wrote:
Does anyone have the actual tech specs for the screen itself
in reference to the 24" Imac (response time, etc.)


The 24" ALU iMac's display panel is an *LG.Philips LM240WU2-SLB1*.
According to TFTcentral, it's an 8-bit S-IPS panel. For more specs see:

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/panel_parts.htm

Great specs, but the specs don't say anything about iMac's problems with
uneven backlighting. The white 24" used the LG.Philips LM240WU2-SLA1,
and had a gorgeous display -- as does NEC's professional LCD2490WUXi.

Check the specs, but also check some [24'' ALU iMac screen photos.|http://picasaweb.google.com/TheLooby]

How do you think the screen on the 24" Imac compares to this HP 24" monitor?:

[HP w2408| http://www.shopping.hp.com/product/display/display/1/storefronts/RY117AA%2523ABA ]


I don't have a mfgr's part number, but it uses a 6-bit TN panel. Faster
than S-IPS, but significantly poorer viewing angles. OTOH, it probably
doesn't have the brightness gradent problems common in ALU iMacs.

For $75 more, HP's LP2465 and Dell's 2407 have superior 8-bit LCD panels,
and much better warranties (3-year & 5-year versus 1-year on the w2408).
I'm sure there are many other good (or better) choices as well, but I haven't
been monitor-shopping lately.

Looby

Dec 13, 2007 6:40 PM in response to blair.harrington

An S-IPS panel is a true 8-bit panel and the physical construction is different from that of the 6-bit TN panel used in the 20" model. It is capable of more precise graphics and displays the full range of colors, whereas a TN panel uses dithering (electronic trickery) to fool the eyes into seeing more than is actually there. If the HP display you indicated uses a TN panel, I would expect you to get better graphics quality from the 24" iMac.

Dec 13, 2007 7:22 PM in response to blair.harrington

blair.harrington wrote:

Isn't an IBS panel better than a TN panel? Meaning the Imac screen
is actually better than the HP one I linked?


A good S-IPS display is better than a good TN display, but the best
S-IPS matrix ever manufactured can easily be turned into a POS when
mated to badly designed backlight, diffuser, or inverter components.

[My 24'' ALU iMac|http://picasaweb.google.com/TheLooby] had excellent color and viewing angles, but it also
had an intense hotspot on the left side of the screen. Nothin' wrong
with the LCD matrix -- but Apple managed to FUBAR the backlight.

...kinda like a 12-cylinder Ferrari, with 'only' one broken piston,

Looby

Dec 15, 2007 10:39 AM in response to The Looby

I spent a lot of time at Best Buy yesterday comparing both screens I mentioned in my initial post. They both suffer from serious glare issues in the light, but the Imac wins hands down simply for the fact that there is a glass covering on the screen itself. It really makes a difference, at least in my eyes and presentation wise, when comparing the HP and Imac screens.

Tech Specs for 24" Imac Screen/Comparison

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.