Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

ATI 1900

I am not planning to load Windows on my Mac, use it mainly for music, internet and casual gaming ( Apple games not Windows games ), I suppose for this the ATI 1900 would be sufficient and I do not really have to worry about a bigger graphics card.

Would like your opinions about this please.

Thanks

Mac Pro 2 x 2.66 dual Xeon, Mac OS X (10.5.1)

Posted on Jan 15, 2008 8:00 PM

Reply
Question marked as Best reply

Posted on Jan 16, 2008 5:39 AM

Hi Freddie,

I have bought my Mac Pro with the X1900 card for the 'old' Windows games I already owned (latest was Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion).
And it still runs fantastically fast with it in 1600x1200 resolution with all details set to high.
Did try the Prey Demo with the same settings and the resulting FPS (frames per second) were superb.

Although I find myself glimpsing at the new Nvidia 8800, I am very happy with the ATI and am quite sure that I stick with it for a long time.

Have Fun

Stefan
3 replies
Question marked as Best reply

Jan 16, 2008 5:39 AM in response to Freddie Herbst

Hi Freddie,

I have bought my Mac Pro with the X1900 card for the 'old' Windows games I already owned (latest was Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion).
And it still runs fantastically fast with it in 1600x1200 resolution with all details set to high.
Did try the Prey Demo with the same settings and the resulting FPS (frames per second) were superb.

Although I find myself glimpsing at the new Nvidia 8800, I am very happy with the ATI and am quite sure that I stick with it for a long time.

Have Fun

Stefan

ATI 1900

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.