OSX and Radeon 9000 Pro vs 9800 Pro

I'm currently mulling over whether to get either the ATI Radeon 9000 Pro or the 9800 Pro for my (1.4GHz upgraded) Gigabit Ethernet G4 running Leopard. Bearing in mind the age of the machine, I don't want to spend too much on it, but will I notice a much bigger kick to graphics performance of the OS with the 9800 compared to the 9000? In other words is it worth spending double on the 9800?

Your thoughts please!

G4 Gigabit (PowerLogix 1.4GHz). iBook G4 1.2GHz. iPod G2 Touchwheel., Mac OS X (10.5.1)

Posted on Jan 17, 2008 7:23 AM

Reply
13 replies

Jan 31, 2008 4:48 PM in response to Laurence Cable

It really depends on what monitor you are using and what you're going to be using the computer for. The 9000 will work directly with an ADC monitor, where the 9800 would require an adapter. The 9000 will not work with a VGA monitor unless you have an adapter (available for very cheap). It looks as if both will support Core Image. Core Image enhances graphics and is required with some high end apps. For basic needs I doubt there will be a large difference between the 9000 and 9800.

Jan 31, 2008 8:49 PM in response to Laurence Cable

Hi,I've been using the flashed version of the agp 9200 and it worked fine with my 24" samsung LCD.
But it is not core image ready.So i broke down and bought the 9800 pro and it has made for a better visual experience.I've only had it a couple of days but i notice better overall color and crispness.
When i play a DVD the in full screen mode the colors (especially the blacks) are better.With the 9200 I had to stand back a little for the DVD to look normal at full screen mode, with the 9800 i can sit and watch from arms length.In my opinion the 9800 is worth purchasing.
JJA

Feb 1, 2008 4:02 AM in response to Laurence Cable

Hi Laurence Cable-

I have both cards. The 9000 is long retired. Moved the 9000 to my daughters dual 500 GE, and then replaced it with another 9800.
Hands down, the 9800 is the better performance choice, and worth the extra $60-$80 (currently a $55 difference at OWC).
The 9000 was, actually, a waste of money, compared to the performace boost of the 9800......The 9000 is a nice card, and good for those who simply want to drive a widescreen LCD monitor. It's just not a +performance card+ like the 9800 is.

Feb 8, 2008 7:27 PM in response to WegoMac

Hi WegoMac-

No, I used the 9800 for quite some time before I upgraded the PSU. What prompted the PSU upgrade, was the addition of several other devices, and the degradation of power under load, due to heat.
With only the 9800, the AGP 237W PSU will still provide enough power. With a single processor upgrade, up to 2 harddrives, and the 9800, the stock PSU will still keep up. Anything beyond this, and you will be taxing the PSU.
As I mentioned before, it is the heat that really gets the PSU. As temperature increases inside the tower, the hot air is removed through the PSU. This, in turn, reduces the ability of the PSU to cool itself- using +hot air+ for cooling. As temperature increases, a PSUs ability to produce reliable power decreases. Eventually, components will be power starved, and the system freezes.
If reducing heat is something that you care to address (recommended) installing a PCI slot fan can greatly aid the cooling of the tower/components, and help maintain a stable system. A fan such as this Thermaltake, exhausts to the exterior, is quiet, and will aid in cooling. Placed next to the 9800, will also help to remove the added heat produced by the 9800. Other system coolers are here.
One note- if you use another exaust fan over 30CFM, I recommend getting a higher CFM case fan (the 120mm) >82CFM.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

OSX and Radeon 9000 Pro vs 9800 Pro

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.