Non square album art from iTunes and use of .bmp vs. .jpg
iTunes, when it finds a match, downloads (usually) a 1GB 600x600 .bmp for an album. Does the iPod work more efficiently with these files or would it be better to convert the 600x600 .bmp to a 250x250 .jpg that's only, say 20KB in size and tag each track? Depending upon the number of track on the album would it space and/or make the ipod work harder to convert the .jpg to .bmp when operating?
To me, having to populate screens, cover flow, album lists, etc. from such huge files (600x600) must take a lot of work and converting. The ipod screen certainly doesn't display 600x600. Is there a known album art size that is more efficient?
Self-built / Intel Quad Core, Windows Vista, iPod Classic 160GB