Terry Jackson1 wrote:
Working directly on files on the server is bad practice....
Rubbish.
Real server set-ups have UPSs and RAID and have a
much smaller chance of anything nasty happening than a normal desktop system.
The only argument for working on files locally is where the files are huge and/or you aren’t using gigabit Ethernet.
Terry Jackson1 wrote:
think of it this way, say you get a surge or spike and the server takes a hit
while your in the middle of airbrushing that photo? Do you think it will
be recoverable after that?
How is this different from the situation where your local machine takes a hit while you’re in the middle of airbrushing your photo? (Answer: it isn’t, except that the latter is much more likely to happen because you probably aren’t attached to a whacking great UPS.)
The only way to keep your data properly safe is to take regular back-ups anyway, so this is a total non-argument.
And from the perspective of a software developer, network drives are basically the same as other drives on the machine. 99% of problems I’ve seen are caused by unwarranted assumptions (e.g. that the temporary folder is on the same filesystem, or that some bit of the filesystem is case-insensitive). If software malfunctions when used with a network home,
that is a bug (though admittedly in some cases it may be a bug in part of Mac OS X). It doesn’t matter how much the developer’s support staff would like to characterise it as an “unsupported configuration” (doing that is akin to Boeing telling airlines that thanks to a problem with their guidance system, flying west is unsupported and that all Boeing pilots should work around the issue by flying east instead—i.e. it’s silly).