As a long-time Word user, after Appleworks, I didn't think I'd take a second look at an Apple word processing program but with the iWorks free trial, I tried Pages. It looked really good and I think it is good but I'm not convinced that it's at a point to be able to switch from Word yet. With the first template I tried, I couldn't change some of the things that I really wanted to in the heading and couldn't find a suitable alternative template to use. I hadn't thought of it but you're right, I guess I could create my own templates but I actually don't use templates; my documents really aren't that similar to make it worthwhile to create a template. For me, part of the value would be in not having to make a template (in which case, I could simply continue using Word) but being able to sufficiently customize an existing template (thus saving time).
Even as far as graphics are concerned, I find that I can do whatever I want with Word. Word allows you to place an manipulate objects on the page also.
Pages looked nicer as an app and I think it's easier and quicker to use if either Apple or a user creates their own template or shortcut. But I feel that you can also create whatever you want from within Word.
As per some of the replies, admittedly there are unnecessary features in Word (I don't know enough about Pages; is the situation different such that every feature in Pages is fabulously useful?). I find that I don't use the styles at all and I don't use the comments and highlighting features except for my own personal drafts - I like it as the equivalent of using post-its on a hard copy. Comparing successive drafts was a useful feature for legal documents.
I wouldn't say that Word is more for Professional use than Pages but I still feel that Word is more useful for professions that are extremely text-centered and require for lack of a better word, a formal writing style (with high formatting needs - both within the main text and footnotes, endnotes, references, TOC, tables, charts) such as law and academia (particularly the Humanities and Social Sciences). I actually think that for many Pages would produce more professional looking documents in less time.
It's possible that many of the features are there if you take the time to learn them. But, I felt they were not apparent when using Pages during the trial period or by reading Pages Help section or Apple's on-line descriptive materials. I'm perfectly fine with simply using Word because I've done so for so long.
I also think it's a time issue. With documents that are regularly long and lots of footnotes, references..., I don't have the time to figure out whether Pages can do all that I need it to do and I don't want to take the risk that at some point in the writing process, I'm going to find that Pages really is inadequate or incapable of doing what I want to do. Further, I certainly don't want to run into problems sharing my documents or presentations with the predominantly Windows-based workforce, where compatibility with Word and PowerPoint is important.
I was interested in the poster who said s/he used Pages for a 350 word manuscript, but generally I haven't heard enough about it's usability for long documents to think that it can compete with Word yet or that it can handle all the extras such as endnotes, footnotes, references etc as easily as Word can.
That doesn't mean that subsequent versions of Pages won't do so but there's still the compatibility issue. Many of us have work situations where we do have to share documents with PC users and usually it's the more complex or idiosyncratic formatting that easily gets lost when you're using different systems.
But as per your query:
Is it a super function only hard core Word users know?
Yep. That's the secret that truly makes Word better. if you were a Word User, I'd tell you - Just kidding 🙂