I think Apple would have some legal requirements about third-party vendors claiming Mac compatibility, although the product packaging was printed in 2005 back when G5's were shipping, I don't know if they are continuing to supply packages with this misinformation in stores, or if this particular box had been on the shelf since then. It just seems that Apple would have a legal case to complain about a Mac-compatbile statement when a product is not compatible with any current model Mac's or OS available from Apple at this point in time. I hope that they are updating the printed information on their boxes that are delivered to stores with something like WARNING: Not compatible with any current model Mac from the Apple company since 2005.
The problem with that is enforcement. Numerous software vendors disappear entirely, or lose their Mac support staff. The fact remains, in 2005, Hooked on Phonics really was supporting only Macs that predated 2001 or earlier. Any software vendor that didn't pay attention to Apple's Developer Conference in 2003 declaring Classic is dead, basically has left obsolete software on the shelves since then. They already had two years to update their information.
It may have been a good sale specifically because the people who marketed it knew only those with older hardware would be able to use it, or couldn't sell it because the hardware that could run it was getting harder to find, and they reduced the price to attempt to attract more customers.
March 2001 - Apple introduced Mac OS X, and used Classic as a transition point to Mac OS X, and new Macs could still boot into 9.
January 2003 - New Macs no longer could boot into 9, but could still use Classic.
January 2006 - New Macs no longer could use Classic, but older Macs still could run Classic as part of the current operating system.
October 26, 2007 - 2005 and older Macs with the most current operating system no longer could use Classic unless they dual booted into 10.4.11, or installed Mac OS 9 as a dual boot if they were 2002 and older.
Caveat emptor, if the price looks too good to be true, it probably is.
Message was edited by: a brody