500 gig drive only 465 gig. Is this normal?

Hi all,

whilst I realize that the amount of space you actually get on a drive is less than it is meant to be, how much is acceptable? Actually, it always made me wonder why the available size is not reported accurately, isn't it contravening consumer rights to say one thing and give another???

Maybe I could go into the Apple store to buy a $2,000 iMac, with an envelope stuffed with cash, and the amount of $2,000 written on the front, but with only $1,850 actually inside. Isn't it the same? Would they give me the $2,000 machine? That aside, here is my issue.

I have a MBP with a 200 gig drive - actual space available = 185.99 gig. So, I lose 14 gig.

But the iMac that I took delivery of today has only 465 gig available on the 500 gig drive. So the loss is 35 gig, and that seems like a lot to me.

Anyone have any thoughts on this?

Thanks.

Hugh

Message was edited by: Hugh Anderson1

iMac & MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.4)

Posted on Aug 14, 2008 8:56 PM

Reply
17 replies

Aug 15, 2008 6:32 AM in response to Hugh Anderson1

Hi Hugh,

Hugh Anderson1 wrote:
Yes, I just noticed that the ratio of "lost" space is the same from my examples. Why don't they just tell you that though?

Thanks for the input.

Hugh


Just to clarify further the responses you have already received. In brief, when you see HD capacity advertised as 60GB, 80GB, 100GB etc, that's the marketing way where they take "decimal" road and base 1GB as being equal to 1,000,000,000 bytes. This is true for all HD manufacturers and computer manufacturers.

Once upon a time, computer professionals noticed that 1,024 bytes (binary) was very nearly equal to 1,000 (decimal) and started using the prefix "kilo" to mean 1,024. That worked well enough for a decade or two because everybody who talked kilobytes knew that the term implied 1,024 bytes. But, almost overnight a much more numerous "everybody" bought computers, and the trade computer professionals needed to talk to physicists and engineers and even to ordinary people, most of whom know that a kilometer is 1,000 meters and a kilogram is 1,000 grams.

Often when two or more people begin discussing storage capacity, some will refer to binary values and others will refer to decimal values without making distinction between the two. This has caused much confusion in the past (and still does). In an effort to dispatch this confusion, all major disc drive manufacturers use decimal values when discussing storage capacity.

Some simple arithmetic will convert the advertised (decimal) capacity to the actual (binary) capacity:

1KB = 1,024 bytes
1MB = 1,024 x 1,024 bytes = 1,048,576 bytes
1GB = 1,024 x 1,024 x 1,024 bytes = 1,073,741,824 bytes

Therefore, in your specific case:

500GB (decimal) = 500 ÷ 1.073741824 = 465.66128730774 GB (binary or actual capacity)

Rounded off to two decimal points = 465.66 GB

I hope this clarifies it for you and explains the reasons for the discrepancy.

Kryten

Aug 17, 2008 7:41 PM in response to hootboot

Yes, although there is a calculation that explains why a 500 gig disk only gives us 465 gig, and even though it's explained in the small print, the fact is this: a consumer buys a 500 gig drive and expect to see the number 500 when they open it up on their computer.

In other words, sell it to us in a language we understand, not in technical terms we often don't understand or know.

Any opinions?

Hugh

Aug 17, 2008 11:28 PM in response to Hugh Anderson1

Hugh Anderson1 wrote:

In other words, sell it to us in a language we understand, not in technical terms
we often don't understand or know.

Any opinions?


Uh, most folks "understand" that a billion = 1,000,000,000 -- at least those
who were paying attention in 5th grade. It's not the disk drive manufacturers
who are guilty of purveying cryptic techno-babble, it's the software weenies
who write operating systems. Maybe you should write your congress-critter
and/or file a formal complaint with the chaplain.

...my main gripe is that a US pint is only 16 ounces,

Looby

*"The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from."*
\- Andy Tanenbaum

.

Oct 25, 2008 11:18 AM in response to Nikki B.

I understand how some of you try to explain what's going on with the maths. The point is simple and the original poster's indignation was most correct. Fact is 465GB = 500,000...bytes.
Simply put the manufacturers sell 465GB drives, but they choose to say (for purposes of making it simpler? NOPE, to rip people off, pure and simple) it has 500GB, the main thing to notice being the 'GB'. If it has GB there then it means Gigabytes and can't mean anything else. People are now very much used to the unit Gigabyte so they would have no problem understanding 465GB but that would just wouldn't look so nice on a sticker.
Yes, customers are being ripped off, pure and simple.

Oct 26, 2008 9:57 AM in response to moriwenne

Hi moriwenne,

I think I'm getting the math part right in following this thread. What I'm not following is how you are reasoning that the manufacturers are ripping people off. As you seem to have stated, they are actually selling 465 GB drives, which really do have 500 GB capacity (as can also be seen using Disk Utility) but by calling them 500 GB drives they are ripping people off. Sorry but I'm not following you here. What am I missing?

Rick

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

500 gig drive only 465 gig. Is this normal?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.