Shape box vs. Text box?
You can add fill and picture frames to both, when would a user want to use one over the other?
TIA
Imac/Macbook Pro/FC2/Aperture/Shake/iPhone, Mac OS X (10.5.2), www.splitboard.com
Imac/Macbook Pro/FC2/Aperture/Shake/iPhone, Mac OS X (10.5.2), www.splitboard.com
Kyn Drake wrote:
If you create a shape in Keynote (using Draw a Shape) you can have your text following an irregular shape (like a big letter C filled with a bunch of tiny c's for example).
Using a shape (other than the rectangle) with no stroke and fill will give you the text converted to an image with a transparent background every time. This is useful when you want to make SURE the non-web font you picked gets rendered as an image.
A Text box will cause the footer to move downward, lengthening your page. A shape will simply cross the boundary to be pasted into the footer.
Shapes can have a "background" that's a gradient or an image in addition to colors. Text box backgrounds can only be colors.
Text boxes automatically grow to fit your text. Shapes have to be resized after you enter your text.
That's all I can find for now. I was actually surprised that the shape could handle some of the things I'd thought only text boxes could handle.
Shape box vs. Text box?