You can make a difference in the Apple Support Community!

When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

There is one relatively serious con of the new LED backlit displays in the new MacBook Pros that seems to not get too much mention in the media. About a month ago I bought a new MacBook Pro to replace my standard white MacBook. One feature of the MacBook Pro that I was unaware of was the introduction of the LED backlit display to replace the CCFL backlight.

Once I started using my new laptop for long periods of time, I noticed severe eye strain and minor symptoms almost similar to motion sickness. After 20 or 30 minutes of use, I felt like I had been looking at the screen all day. Much longer and I would get headaches. If I used the old white MacBook (with its CCFL display), I had no eye troubles at all. Moreover, I could detect a distinct flicker on the MacBook Pro display when I moved my eyes across it - especially over high contract areas of the screen. White text on a black background was virtually impossible for me to read without feeling sick to my stomach because of all the flickering from moving my eyes over the text.

The strangest thing about all of this was that nobody else I showed the screen to could see these flickers I was seeing. I began to question my sanity until I did a little research. Discovering that the MacBook Pro introduced a new LED backlit display started to shed some light (so to speak) on what might be going on. I had long known that I could see LED flicker in things like car taillights and christmas lights that most of my friends could not see. I also knew that I could easily see the "rainbow effect" in DLP televisions that many other people don't see.

My research into LED technology turned up the fact that it is a bit of a technological challenge to dim an LED. Varying the voltage generally doesn't work as they are essentially designed to be either on or off with a fixed brightness. To work around this limitation, designers use a technique called pulse width modulation to mimic the appearance of lower intensity light coming out of the LED. I don't claim to fully understand the concept, but it essentially seems to involve very briefly turning off the LED several times over a given time span. The dimmer the LED needs to appear, the more time it spends in the off state.

Because this all happens so very quickly, the human brain does not interpret the flickers as flickers, rather as simply dimmer light. For most people that is. Some people (myself included) are much more sensitive to these flickers. From what I can tell, the concept is called the "flicker fusion threshold" and is the frequency at which sometime that is actually flickering is interpreted by the human brain as being continuously lit. While the vast majority of people have a threshold that doesn't allow them to see the flicker in dimmed LEDs, some people have a higher threshold that causes them to see the flickering in things like LED car tail lights and, unfortunately, LED backlit displays - leading to this terrible eye strain.

The solution? I now keep my screen turned up to full brightness to eliminate the need for the flicker-inducing pulse width modulation. The screen is very bright, but there are no more flickers and I love my MacBook Pro too much to exchange it for a plain MacBook with CCFL backlighting (which will also supposedly be switching to LED backlighting in 2009 anyway.) The staff at my local Apple store was of course more than helpful and was willing to let me exchange my glossy screen for matte even though I was beyond the 14 day return period. I knew that wasn't the problem though as my old MacBook was a glossy display. I've decided to stick with my full brightness solution. Sitting in a brightly-lit room tends to help alleviate how blinding the full brightness of the screen can be. In a dimly-lit room I guess I just wear sunglasses. Either way, the extreme brightness is worlds better than the sickening flicker I saw with a lower brightness setting

I would caution anybody considering buying a product with an LED backlit display to pay careful attention to make sure you don't have this same sensitivity. Turn the screen brightness down, find a high contract area of the screen, and quickly move your eyes back and forth over the screen. If you can detect the flicker, you may end up with this same problem.

I have no idea what percentage of the population has this sensitivity. I imagine we will hear more about it as more and more displays start using this technology. Hopefully the Apple engineers will come up with a way to eliminate this flicker some of us can see.

Russ Martin

15-inch MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.4)

Posted on Aug 23, 2008 8:25 AM

Reply
2,489 replies

May 13, 2014 2:18 AM in response to Exandas

I have a question, in the article of the link below, it says that IGZO display will be flickerless. Does this mean that any flickering or the dithering process will stop bothering some people that possibly are affected by these issues?


I wonder if this is the solution for some of the people in this forum. Apple is rumored to include this tech in the upcoming Ipad Air.


http://www.extremetech.com/computing/160975-apple-prepping-igzo-displays-for-nex t-gen-ipad-to-cut-power-consumption-boost-image-quality

May 13, 2014 4:08 AM in response to Exandas

I cant, it's following me since I posted about 120 pages ago. It keeps surfacing to the top of my "Your Stuff" every time someone buys some non-Apple product and says this helps or does not help.

This is not a chat room for people with eye problems, serious though they may be. It is a forum to help people with a technical issue that can be solved with an aswer. One person, one problem, one thread. I have asked for the thread to be locked three times but the Hosts are more tolerant than I.

Please feel free to report this post (if anyone is on level 2 or above, ah no, that needs people who have helped others with problems and I don't see many posting here)

May 13, 2014 4:46 AM in response to LD150

I feel your pain Peter, it must be really hard for you having something appear in 'your stuff'.


I think I speak for most when I say that we find the broader discussion very helpful and it is difficult to move the conversation elsewhere when it has such traction here. Sorry that you don't wnt it to be this way but you are in the minority. There's certainly no need to be rude.

May 13, 2014 7:20 PM in response to Gareth Jones6

Ok, this is getting ridiculous. I bought Sony xperia Z2, because I tested it with a Dslr in the shop, to be completely flicker free. Also, my wife's Z1 does not irritate my eyes. Now after usin the phone for 3 hours, my eyes are bloodshot and feel like sandpapered.


Back to gs2 that does not irritate at all.


Would there be any way in this modern world to investigate the difference between gs2 screen and Z2 screen, that what is causing the severe eyestrain in the Z2, when sg2s is problem free??

May 13, 2014 8:36 PM in response to mojarvinen

I feel the same way about the Ipad 3 or 4 vs. Ipad Air. I can read the Ipad 3 all day, but the air causes lasting eye pain to my eyes that persists for up to two days. I have the same problem with my macbook pro retina, which I'm having to use with an external CCFL. I am hopeful that there is some underlying solution, given that not all LED screens seem to be problematic. I just wish it were possible to determine what the mechanism of eye strain is and isolate it.

May 13, 2014 11:54 PM in response to mojarvinen

I also think it's flicker, but it's difficult to prove it.


My theory is that most "modern" panels use FRC (dithering) to reach a high color depth because it's cheaper to produce them when they only have 6-bit. There was a time when most if not all IPS panels had 8-bit without FRC. In late 2011, cheap smartphones from chinese companies were introduced that had IPS panels. I remember reviewers wondering why such cheap phones had "expensive" IPS panels. They probably didn't. It was most probably the time when IPS got reduced to 6-bit + FRC, according to some link that was posted here a while ago (TFTcentral?).


Well, is it a coincidence that iPhones (4) from 2010, or as some say early iPhones 4s from late 2011 have one of the eye-friendliest screens? Probably because they still use those old true 8-bit panels without any dithering, probably plus a flicker free backlight.


I'm still waiting for a monitor that officially uses a true 8-bit panel without any kinds of dithering + true flicker free backlight. It may be the only way to get some proof.

Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.