You can make a difference in the Apple Support Community!

When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

There is one relatively serious con of the new LED backlit displays in the new MacBook Pros that seems to not get too much mention in the media. About a month ago I bought a new MacBook Pro to replace my standard white MacBook. One feature of the MacBook Pro that I was unaware of was the introduction of the LED backlit display to replace the CCFL backlight.

Once I started using my new laptop for long periods of time, I noticed severe eye strain and minor symptoms almost similar to motion sickness. After 20 or 30 minutes of use, I felt like I had been looking at the screen all day. Much longer and I would get headaches. If I used the old white MacBook (with its CCFL display), I had no eye troubles at all. Moreover, I could detect a distinct flicker on the MacBook Pro display when I moved my eyes across it - especially over high contract areas of the screen. White text on a black background was virtually impossible for me to read without feeling sick to my stomach because of all the flickering from moving my eyes over the text.

The strangest thing about all of this was that nobody else I showed the screen to could see these flickers I was seeing. I began to question my sanity until I did a little research. Discovering that the MacBook Pro introduced a new LED backlit display started to shed some light (so to speak) on what might be going on. I had long known that I could see LED flicker in things like car taillights and christmas lights that most of my friends could not see. I also knew that I could easily see the "rainbow effect" in DLP televisions that many other people don't see.

My research into LED technology turned up the fact that it is a bit of a technological challenge to dim an LED. Varying the voltage generally doesn't work as they are essentially designed to be either on or off with a fixed brightness. To work around this limitation, designers use a technique called pulse width modulation to mimic the appearance of lower intensity light coming out of the LED. I don't claim to fully understand the concept, but it essentially seems to involve very briefly turning off the LED several times over a given time span. The dimmer the LED needs to appear, the more time it spends in the off state.

Because this all happens so very quickly, the human brain does not interpret the flickers as flickers, rather as simply dimmer light. For most people that is. Some people (myself included) are much more sensitive to these flickers. From what I can tell, the concept is called the "flicker fusion threshold" and is the frequency at which sometime that is actually flickering is interpreted by the human brain as being continuously lit. While the vast majority of people have a threshold that doesn't allow them to see the flicker in dimmed LEDs, some people have a higher threshold that causes them to see the flickering in things like LED car tail lights and, unfortunately, LED backlit displays - leading to this terrible eye strain.

The solution? I now keep my screen turned up to full brightness to eliminate the need for the flicker-inducing pulse width modulation. The screen is very bright, but there are no more flickers and I love my MacBook Pro too much to exchange it for a plain MacBook with CCFL backlighting (which will also supposedly be switching to LED backlighting in 2009 anyway.) The staff at my local Apple store was of course more than helpful and was willing to let me exchange my glossy screen for matte even though I was beyond the 14 day return period. I knew that wasn't the problem though as my old MacBook was a glossy display. I've decided to stick with my full brightness solution. Sitting in a brightly-lit room tends to help alleviate how blinding the full brightness of the screen can be. In a dimly-lit room I guess I just wear sunglasses. Either way, the extreme brightness is worlds better than the sickening flicker I saw with a lower brightness setting

I would caution anybody considering buying a product with an LED backlit display to pay careful attention to make sure you don't have this same sensitivity. Turn the screen brightness down, find a high contract area of the screen, and quickly move your eyes back and forth over the screen. If you can detect the flicker, you may end up with this same problem.

I have no idea what percentage of the population has this sensitivity. I imagine we will hear more about it as more and more displays start using this technology. Hopefully the Apple engineers will come up with a way to eliminate this flicker some of us can see.

Russ Martin

15-inch MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.4)

Posted on Aug 23, 2008 8:25 AM

Reply
2,489 replies

Jun 14, 2012 9:07 AM in response to 4esperanza

Well, what's important to me may not be important to you (and vice versa).


I want to be able to easily adjust the height. I prefer an IPS panel vs. the TN panels on the cheaper displays but that's because I do image editing so I require better color accuracy. The average user would be fine with a TN panel. Anti-glare (matte) is a must.


Personally, I would skip displays with built-in speakers and put the money that I saved into decent external speakers (add a subwoofer if you want more bass response). The sound quality will be significantly better.


Connect the display to the MacBook Pro via an Apple Mini DVI-to-DVI adapter that sells for around $29. (It is occassionally available at a discount.) Only the brand new Retina MacBook Pro has an HDMI port.


Netflix works just fine streamed over the Internet. The Roku is designed to be connected to a TV for streaming Netflix, Amazon Prime, etc. I assume that any of the NEC displays will handle video streaming just fine but I'm not very knowledgeable about how display specs affect video quality. I do know that serious video gaming requires more of a display and the computer graphics card. You can do a little research using Google to make sure that a dsiplay's specs will meet your needs.

Jun 14, 2012 5:58 PM in response to Gurm42

These 27 pages of posts are a treasure trove of data, but we need some generous soul to go through them all and tabulate the reports.


This way we could find which Apple models seem to be fine, and which produce the worst eye strain. If nothing else it could help people know which models to buy.


It would be very interesting if some models have mixed reports --- then we'd want to see if different hardware is used within one model line, or the same hardware is variable.


If we had a data matrix from all the reports, perhaps we could start to narrow down the cause. I've collected a list of all the hypothesized mechanisms to account for the eye strain from the Apple LED displays:


Pulse Width Modulation flicker

Color dither flicker

LED spectrum

LED polarization

LED radio frequency emissions

Absolute brightness

Glossy vs. matte

Jun 14, 2012 6:21 PM in response to MauiTechnoGeek2

To me it's a little simpler than all that. First in that there has not particuarly been a go-to model, the LED complication is nearly universal to Apple's product line. An objective list isn't really possible so to pass it as any kind of sound advice, with mileage bound to vary, seems like a pretty bad idea. This has after all been a long and speculative discussion, with many important points that won't fit on any kind of list.


It doesn't seem like Apple has ever implemented a (admittedly theoretical) gentle LED solution yet, even though I swear it's not an engineering limitation. It's strange because there's obviously positive attributes their approach, it is in some ways pretty high-end, but something is also harsh. Who can say really what kind of give and take they must decide on. Off the top of my head it seems like the iPad 2 has enjoyed some favor with this thread, perhaps there were a few other products? I'll note I believe the iPhone 4S was an improvement over the 4, it actually had what to me were very apparent improvements, yet I've never come across a review that acknowledged any sort of display update. There certainly was however. It's warmer, better lit and easier on my eyes personally. On that note, and elaborating on "LED spectrum" as a suspect, cool and blue tones have come up on a few pages, which of course is the driving force behind Gunnar Optiks' claims and one I happen to agree with. I'm actually still using f.lux, on mild settings.

Jun 15, 2012 2:39 AM in response to Pixel Eater

I actually tried wearing AmberDrive 2 glasses when using the HP 2311x matte LED monitor, but it didn't prevent the eye strain. My eyes would get blurry and dry using it after about 10 minutes. But as Pixel Eater noted, there might be a residual flicker that my "waving white pen" test could not discern. The frequency by the way was very high, maybe 500Hz.


I found a page where some students did measured the spectral power distribution of a few MacBooks. You can see how different LED is from CCFL. Interestingly, the LEDs have a more continuous spectrum, while the CCFLs are broken up by a number of spikes. But LEDs have that big fat blue spike that exceeds all other wavelengths.


http://rhogammabeta.wordpress.com/2010/08/20/activity-2-i-see-the-light/

Jun 15, 2012 3:30 AM in response to MauiTechnoGeek2

Now that is certainly fascinating to see charted out. Clearly while the wavelengths of LEDs share an easily recognized pattern, there is also tangible variation. It isn't surprising that all LEDs are not the same, but I'm not sure I'd thought of it this plainly.


As for glasses or color temperature solutions there's no spin they could really put on flicker, even if they claim this. Their real contribution is in solving a spectral/color problem. The push for 9,300k temperatures was always a blight, but how people love blues and cool temps. What it does to whites is one of the main attractions, but also brings us closer to the harshest glow a backlight can cast. That also tends to be the sort of light that looks pretty wild illuminating a wall, especially if a movie is playing. You can actually rein in this effect quite a bit. Anyway this move into 9,300k seemingly trended around the year 2000. I'd actually like to really commend Apple for what looks to me like a graduated plan of warming things up, just a bit, with every release over the last few years. Sunlight is something like 6,500k, so I feel like getting away from that could only do harm, not to mention butcher color accuracy. I would certainly recommend everyone check on their color temperatures where applicable. I can't overstate how key this has been for me personally. Apple products and even my monitor usually omit OSD settings so adjusments are OS and graphics card side. f.lux is the simplest no-effort approach. You could also go advanced and replicate something like whatever percentage of the Adobe spectrum you can manage. I own a colorometer which takes this to a science, but that is definitely not any kind of a requirement, unless you're dealing in Photoshop or similar. Happily, 6,500k is the target for that sort of work.

Jun 15, 2012 3:41 AM in response to MauiTechnoGeek2

Very interesting!


I have done a little bit of search and found the following comparison between iPad 2 and the new iPad:

http://dot-color.com/2012/03/22/apples-new-ipad-boasts-better-colors-how-did-the y-do-it/


The new iPad (3) clearly has more "blue" than the iPad 2.

Perhaps the blue wavelength is really the reason causing our discomfort?


For myself, when looking at the "uncomfortable" LED screens, they always seems too bright no matter how I set the brightness. I wonder if that's due to the blue hike.

Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.