You can make a difference in the Apple Support Community!

When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

There is one relatively serious con of the new LED backlit displays in the new MacBook Pros that seems to not get too much mention in the media. About a month ago I bought a new MacBook Pro to replace my standard white MacBook. One feature of the MacBook Pro that I was unaware of was the introduction of the LED backlit display to replace the CCFL backlight.

Once I started using my new laptop for long periods of time, I noticed severe eye strain and minor symptoms almost similar to motion sickness. After 20 or 30 minutes of use, I felt like I had been looking at the screen all day. Much longer and I would get headaches. If I used the old white MacBook (with its CCFL display), I had no eye troubles at all. Moreover, I could detect a distinct flicker on the MacBook Pro display when I moved my eyes across it - especially over high contract areas of the screen. White text on a black background was virtually impossible for me to read without feeling sick to my stomach because of all the flickering from moving my eyes over the text.

The strangest thing about all of this was that nobody else I showed the screen to could see these flickers I was seeing. I began to question my sanity until I did a little research. Discovering that the MacBook Pro introduced a new LED backlit display started to shed some light (so to speak) on what might be going on. I had long known that I could see LED flicker in things like car taillights and christmas lights that most of my friends could not see. I also knew that I could easily see the "rainbow effect" in DLP televisions that many other people don't see.

My research into LED technology turned up the fact that it is a bit of a technological challenge to dim an LED. Varying the voltage generally doesn't work as they are essentially designed to be either on or off with a fixed brightness. To work around this limitation, designers use a technique called pulse width modulation to mimic the appearance of lower intensity light coming out of the LED. I don't claim to fully understand the concept, but it essentially seems to involve very briefly turning off the LED several times over a given time span. The dimmer the LED needs to appear, the more time it spends in the off state.

Because this all happens so very quickly, the human brain does not interpret the flickers as flickers, rather as simply dimmer light. For most people that is. Some people (myself included) are much more sensitive to these flickers. From what I can tell, the concept is called the "flicker fusion threshold" and is the frequency at which sometime that is actually flickering is interpreted by the human brain as being continuously lit. While the vast majority of people have a threshold that doesn't allow them to see the flicker in dimmed LEDs, some people have a higher threshold that causes them to see the flickering in things like LED car tail lights and, unfortunately, LED backlit displays - leading to this terrible eye strain.

The solution? I now keep my screen turned up to full brightness to eliminate the need for the flicker-inducing pulse width modulation. The screen is very bright, but there are no more flickers and I love my MacBook Pro too much to exchange it for a plain MacBook with CCFL backlighting (which will also supposedly be switching to LED backlighting in 2009 anyway.) The staff at my local Apple store was of course more than helpful and was willing to let me exchange my glossy screen for matte even though I was beyond the 14 day return period. I knew that wasn't the problem though as my old MacBook was a glossy display. I've decided to stick with my full brightness solution. Sitting in a brightly-lit room tends to help alleviate how blinding the full brightness of the screen can be. In a dimly-lit room I guess I just wear sunglasses. Either way, the extreme brightness is worlds better than the sickening flicker I saw with a lower brightness setting

I would caution anybody considering buying a product with an LED backlit display to pay careful attention to make sure you don't have this same sensitivity. Turn the screen brightness down, find a high contract area of the screen, and quickly move your eyes back and forth over the screen. If you can detect the flicker, you may end up with this same problem.

I have no idea what percentage of the population has this sensitivity. I imagine we will hear more about it as more and more displays start using this technology. Hopefully the Apple engineers will come up with a way to eliminate this flicker some of us can see.

Russ Martin

15-inch MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.4)

Posted on Aug 23, 2008 8:25 AM

Reply
2,489 replies

Jul 20, 2012 2:49 AM in response to FNP7

I've been using f.lux since February or so and it has easily been the biggest improvement in my issues, besides finding a flickerless/pwm-free matte display. Prior to that I had gone a few months hardly touching a computer. I keep it at the point where the display doesn't start to look jaundiced, but is warm as possible while retaining good whites and something like good color accuracy. The detail I noticed the most is the reduction in the tell-tale eerie blue glow typically cast on the walls and blinds when people watch TV in a dimly lit room. Speaking of, I also try to keep a balance of warm incandescent lighting.

Jul 30, 2012 2:09 PM in response to RMartin111

I've been reading the archives of this discussion, because I had a recent experience which made me realize that I'm one of the LED-sensitive. It was a Google Nexus 7 tablet that caused me horrible eyestrain, but I see the same problem with iPads, recent Macbooks, IMacs, and most recent monitors (though curiously, not with my iPhone 3GS). It seems like almost any LED-backlit monitor (other than the iPhone) causes me problems, and almost no CCFL-backlit monitor does. Here is a really interesting video that may shed some light (no pun intended) on the issue:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lvtqqlhem8


You look at that, and you wonder how LED backlighting ever got popular. It's just an inferior technology. Fortunately, it's inferior in other ways as well: LED backlit monitors do not have as good a spectrum of colors as CCFL-backlit monitors (at least, the typical white LED backlit monitors don't; RGB LED-backlit monitors are probably just as good, but they are extremely expensive and extremely rare).


For now, the solution is simple: use an external monitor, and make sure that it is CCFL backlit. There are still CCFL-backlit monitors being made. Dell makes some good ones, e.g. the U2410 (about $500) and the U2711 (about $1000). There are also cheaper ones if you aren't worried about extremely accurate colors. For me, $500 is a small price for preserving my vision. Also, a new CCFL monitor should be good for at least 5 years, maybe more, and by then hopefully we'll have better alternatives.

Jul 30, 2012 4:18 PM in response to mvanier

mvanier, that video doesn't tell us anything new, it just shows a LED monitor that happens to flicker and a CCFL monitor that happens not to. Both types come in both varieties, flickering and flicker-free. Newer Apple displays actually do not flicker, but people here still have problems. For some flickering might not even be an issue.


And if you're buying a CCFL monitor you should be looking at NEC. People here have only positive experiences.

Jul 30, 2012 5:04 PM in response to CoreLinker

I'm sure the NEC CCFL monitors are fine too. An interesting side-note is that Dell specifically chose to use CCFL backlights in recent high-end monitors to get better color range, so CCFL is not dead technology yet.


As for the statement "newer Apple displays do not flicker", I've seen no convincing evidence to that effect (please enlighten me if I've missed something). Apple doesn't release its backlight specs as far as I know, so until someone points a 600 fps camera at a newer Apple monitor I will reserve judgement. If you don't use PWM you have to lower current to dim an LED backlight, and that will change the color temperature, possibly messing up color accuracy. I could see this being acceptable on an iPhone perhaps, but not on other Apple monitors. I still have no explanation as to why the iPhone screen doesn't bother me while larger LED screens all do.


Now, what Apple monitors may be doing is running PWM at a higher frequency than other monitors do. However, my visual inspections show that Apple monitors are as bad or worse at perceived discomfort than other monitors I've seen, so if they are it isn't helping.


And yes, CCFL monitors do flicker, but the flicker is much less irritating in my experience.

Jul 30, 2012 11:25 PM in response to mvanier

I would bet in the video the ccfl is at 100% brightness.

I have a 1000 fps camera and indeed cannot see any flicker on some of the latest Apple products (MacBook Pro 13 and both Airs and iPad). I'm quite sure though all Apple products are now flicker free.

Still my problems are there and thinking that 1000fps is still not enough, repeated the tests with an oscilloscope with same result - no flicker

Aug 2, 2012 12:09 PM in response to mvanier

Here's pure conjecture. I learned about LED display construction from here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiejNAUwcQ8

The LEDs are arranged in a row along the top or bottom of the display, and optical layers spread the light out evenly over the screen. If there are enough LEDs, then pulse width modulation can be dithered in its phase without causing much spatial variation in time on the screen. There is a tradeoff between how many increments of brightness one can get and how uniform the light over the screen can be. To get 8 increments of brightness, you would knock out n out of 8 LEDs at any one time, as evenly spaced as possible over the LEDs, shifting which LEDs are out. As long as the optical system can blend together a width of 8 LEDs, no pulse will be detected on the screen. However, if their light is not totally blended, one may be able to detect pulse on small spatial scales. So StefanD13, you might try focusing your probe on a very small section of screen, very close to top or bottom edges, and see if you can detect any flicker.

Aug 2, 2012 12:40 PM in response to MauiTechnoGeek2

Interesting idea. One possible problem is that if there are too few LEDs and low brightness, then motion artifacts could be produced. For instance, if you divide the LEDs into 8 groups, and go from +------- to -+------ to --+----- etc., you might see a line of brightness moving along the screen, which might account for the motion sickness some people have reported, as well as eyestrain as the eyes subconsciously track the movement. You might get clever and move the lighted part around randomly or quasi-randomly to defeat this, at the cost of considerably more complex circuitry.


BTW I've been using the f.lux program on my old CCFL monitor and I was very surprised how much of a positive difference it made even on a monitor I don't have problems with. As others have pointed out, there are at least two distinct phenomena at work here: flicker and blue light sensitivity (though they may be synergistic where eyestrain is concerned). CCFLs produce lots of blue light, but still quite a bit less proportionally than white LEDs (no massive spike in the blue part of the spectrum). I'm not sure if anyone has posted this link before, but it's worth reading:


http://texyt.com/bright+blue+leds+annoyance+health+risks


It's quite alarmist, but there is a lot of interesting information there too. I was not aware of the problems of focussing blue-lit objects. Maybe this is why traffic lights are red, yellow, and green only.

Aug 2, 2012 8:52 PM in response to mvanier

Has anybody tried inverting the colors through system preferences > accesibility? It seems to be helping me. I couldn't figure out what was going on for the longest time until I found this thread. I've had brain MRIs done with doctors thinking something is wrong with my brain because of the severe headaches and motion sickness I've had. I knew it was from this screen. I get a sharp headache around my left eye and motion sickness every time I start using my 2010 macbook pro. I tried inverting the colors and it seems to help. I feel like a white background is the worst when trying to read text.

Aug 3, 2012 9:56 AM in response to djucsb

What a cool idea! I agree that white backgrounds are awful for long-term computer use. I have a bunch of tricks I use to change backgrounds to either dark or a dull gray, which is much easier to deal with. Firefox is a much friendlier browser than Safari in this respect, since there are several add-ons that let you change background colors. When I use a terminal (which I do a lot, being a programmer) I usually set it to a dark green background with light gray text. But I would still recommend you invest in an external monitor, preferably a CCFL one.


On another topic, has anyone ever used the HP Dreamcolor monitor (the LP2480zx)? It's insanely expensive (list price $3500, available for under $2200) but uses RGB LEDs in a backplane as the backlight. You can adjust the backlight color temperature to whatever you want. As far as I know, this is the only monitor out there that uses RGB LEDs for the backlight, and is targeted at industry professionals who absolutely must have perfect colors (edge-lit white LEDs don't come close). Here's a video (basically just an extended ad, but it does show what the monitor can do):


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bz67BqKdcU


What I want to know is if this monitor causes the same problems as other LED monitors in sensitive people like us. You could theoretically dial down the blueness of the backlight as far as you want, so blue light shouldn't be a problem. Flicker could of course still be a problem.

Aug 3, 2012 11:01 AM in response to mvanier

I don't know if RGB LED but HP ZR2740w was tested by prad.de (sorry only german) to be pwm free.


http://www.prad.de/new/monitore/test/2012/test-hp-zr2740w.html#Einleitung


My assumption is that it is RGB LED, also users with same issues as ours, report in the prad.de forum about positive experience with the monitor (no eye strain).


And a side question... Does anyone knows how AMOLEDs are dimmed? To my understanding each pixel is controlled separately, including brightness.

Aug 6, 2012 2:41 PM in response to StefanD13

Bad news for me.


This weekend I went to my local apple store and had my iPhone 4s swapped over due to call quality.

Lovely new phone. Immediate eyestrain and nausea!


The one device left that didn't give make me feel like death seems to have crossed over to the dark side.

Don't know if anyone else has had issue with the iPhone. Having had a multitude of iPhones I had come to the cOnclusion that this would be safe.


My request again. Begging. Does anyone know of any up to date laptops that do not cause these symptoms? I tried the new MBP retina display for a day and it was almost fine. Eyes were tense but no headache or nausea. But too expensive to keep.


Any suggestions would be very gratefully recieved.


Cheers

Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.