Skip navigation
This discussion is archived

CCC vs. Super Duper ?

916 Views 3 Replies Latest reply: Nov 17, 2008 12:46 PM by Kenichi Watanabe RSS
bdaTori Calculating status...
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 17, 2008 12:24 PM
Which of the two utility backup programs are better? Carbon Copy Cloner or Super Duper --- Is there much difference? Reliability?
PowerPC G4 QuickSilver, Mac OS X (10.4.11), eMAC G4 (10.3.7), Powerbook G4 (10.5)
  • Kappy Level 10 Level 10 (220,980 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 17, 2008 12:32 PM (in response to bdaTori)
    They are both equally reliable in my experience. CCC has the edge in my opinion because it can be configured for schedules and different backup formats much easier than SD. SD has a difficult scripting language that I think makes it less usable for typical needs. If you are in academia CCC is free. If not it's donationware. SD must be purchased for any use other than a full disk clone. CCC is slightly faster than SD, but not by much.
    Mac Pro 2.66 Ghz; MacBook Pro C2D 2.33 Ghz; MacBook Pro 2.16 Ghz, Mac OS X (10.5.4), Intel iMac C2D 17 "; MacBook 2.0 Ghz; 30 GB iPod Video (Black); iPod Nano 2 GB
  • V.K. Level 9 Level 9 (56,120 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 17, 2008 12:32 PM (in response to bdaTori)
    both work great for me and I never had any problems with either of them. I'd say either one is just fine.
    Mac Pro 3.2 GHz, Mac OS X (10.5.5), Mac Pro 2.66GHz, powerbook G4 1.5GHz
  • Kenichi Watanabe Level 7 Level 7 (29,985 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 17, 2008 12:46 PM (in response to bdaTori)
    I use Carbon Copy Cloner, but I have not heard of any downside for using SuperDuper. SuperDuper is fully functional for its main purpose, making a bootable clone, but there are some features that are crippled until a shareware fee is paid. Carbon Copy Cloner is fully functional for all features, although the developer asks that users consider making a donation (user chooses amount) to support further development. The full feature sets are obviously different.

    But for the basic function of making a bootable clone, I think both utilities use the same method. Therefore, I think they produce identical results.

    You can also use Apple's Disk Utility to make a bootable duplicate (on the Restore tab). However, you need to be booted from another volume (not the one you want to duplicate); you can use your Mac OS installation disc. With the two cloning utilities, you can duplicate the volume that is currently booted. However, it may still be best to be booted from a different volume, if that is possible.
    Various including Intel iMac, Power Mac G5, Pismo w/G4, Power Mac 8100 w/G3, Mac OS X (10.5.5), also Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac OS X 10.3.9, and Mac OS 9.x


More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)


  • This solved my question - 10 points
  • This helped me - 5 points
This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.