It can transcode video in 1/4 of the actual running time or less . I use it daily. FOr $100 or so it is a real benefit.
Well, if you can really convert a file at "1/4 the actual running time" (1/4 "realtime" or 1/4 the time to convert without the unit?), then that would be something, Rick. Under the best of conditions, my unit only converts at 1/3 the time it takes to convert without the stick -- which on my system is a max of 0.75% real time or 6 times longer than it takes me to demux the same file. On the other hand, I agree that overall, this device is well worth the price and I managed to convert a total 29 1-hour TV shows, thirteen 24-25 minute TV shows, a 20 minute movie serial along with the remaining eleven 13-minute serial episodes this weekend -- making it my most productive weekend yet.
However, there are a few additional things you should know about it, Agustin. You cannot add new content to your batch list while it is running in the current release (build 294). In addition, there are still data rate excursion problems on the low side when using the TV export option which may cause data rate to drop as low as 200 or 150 Kbps producing pixellation and/or dropping of the block-16 sub-elements. In addition, re-buffering problems still exist when streaming content to the TV device using subsequent beta versions which have yet to be incorporated into the public release but do seem to correct the excursion problem. Resolution is still limited and the pre-set resolutions are typically less than normal software conversion defaults leaving it up to hardware devices to provide additional scaling or the user to use custom resolutions. However, this difference is minor and does result in an increase in the "per pixel" quality of the file. Using a similar strategy, widescreen content is converted to 1.5:1 data matrices during conversions and flagged as anamorphic content for the purposes of playback. And, while the stick seems to convert to near 2.35:1 and 2.40:1 aspect ratios, it seems to convert all 1.85:1 content to standard 16:9 (1.78:1) anamorphic files and I did notice that difference visually.
Overall, I am generally very impressed by Elgato's first-year efforts here and can't wait to see what they come up with in the future if/when they elect to market an HD counterpart for this device with the required additional "horsepower" to handle such content. Unfortunately, despite my enthusiasm, I expect this may still be down the road a ways yet.
