Best Sample Rate

And which species of Bat...
http://www.springerlink.com/content/l73783g7v2p5j258/

yes Higer rate os 88.2.96 or better 192 should be also good...

But there are Human objective Limiting (Scientific).... the max range of Humans ears, is nominally from 20 to 18.000 or 20.000 Hertz (lower frequenzy can be fisically perceived as Heart Quake! 🙂 )

the frequienziec over 8000-10.000 are perceived only as sinusoidal waves (harmonics important only if combined with a sound to determine the stamp Sound)

So I continue to suggest Logic + Leopard + 48Khz!
(avoid to use other bulls *t like digidesign core audio or TDM)

G

🙂
I know BatMan... Erik
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman

he is my Alterego

but (BAT spellimg in Italian)
http://src.infinitewave.ca/

this are objective result!

G

fermusic wrote:
Samples Rate is Mathematics...
this question is not related with

belong to: Human or Bat

the answer must objective...
is an objective answer and there's absolutely nothing of subjective in Samples rate numbers!
this leads to false answers and urban legends

this is a objective answer that are focused to the question of the Topic....

You haven't read/understood the very last sentence on the http://src.infinitewave.ca/ help page:
*It is not always possible to judge subjective quality from the presented measurement results.*

Eriksimon wrote:
*It is not always possible to judge subjective quality from the presented measurement results.*

yes you are free to use a Mrshall Amp and record at 22.000 on Mono than use a Compact cassete recorder... put the tape in your pocket and go in the NY METRO after the 02:00 AM until 07:00!

Go back to your studio in Germany... you will see tha ammazzing result...
(you need to play your compact casset with the weath insede your cassette recorder)

there are objective result that allow me to say that Logic is the most Digital Audio Workstation...
Cubase
Protools and the other was born OBSOLETE and they are just now obsolete!!!

THAT IS WHY LOGIC DOES NOT REQUIRE UPGRADE!!!
for now!

have a good time Erik... and read the Logic manual... you are memorized every word writed in the manual... but you need to learn how Logic works!
you need to read the Logic manual again and again... with no result!

G

It is not always possible to judge subjective quality from the presented measurement results.

the subjective thinking are always respectable...

but the sample rate conversion add artifacts if you use ALL DAWs except Logic...

I use Avalon Preamplifire and Nueman... I don't want articacts in my Music...

*the Sample rate conversion is not a Logic Leopard problem!*

I don't like Digital Artfacts... I'm happy to work at 48Khz with Logic!
(this is my personal subjective taste)

you are free to make crappy music sounds if you like that!

G

I'll do what you tell me to. You're the Captain.

Thanks
I just avoid the confusion that was spreaded every day in this forum!
hopeing to be helpful for Logic users
🙂

http://src.infinitewave.ca/

G

I think I've finally figured it out...

fermusic wrote:
be popular about what you (BeeJay) are writing here, is not my priority!
I'm popular for my Music... not for that ridicolous points.

GWBush wrote:
I know I gave it my all for eight years and I did not sell my soul for the sake of popularity

Coincidence ?

James

you are talking about sample rate conversion?

or Political conversion?

religion conversion

the best sample rate is 48Khz

I'm just talking about objective test!

I can say "Thanks" to BeeJay :-D

I use UAD Precision Equalizer that works by oversampling at 192 Khz!

I can convert any sample rate to another with perfect result... (obvious related to 2009 January technology)

The quality of Leopard and Logic 8 are reported here:
http://src.infinitewave.ca/

you can compare the quality with Cubase, PT LE and TDM and Ableton7 is not so good and many other DAWs!

G

So now everyone tracking at 44.1 kHz trust that every plugin they use have good algorithms doing intenal upsampling/downsampling ("oversampling")?
Wouldnt it be better to track at high samplerate and then do the src conversion in the end with something you have control over?

Edit: yes

thats also been a thing on my mind as well when it comes to sampler instruments . when im operating at 96k and then load an EXS Sampler that uses samples are created at 44100 there is a codec being used to do a realtime sample rate conversion. i am loading EXS instruments from Logics Orchestral Library Instruments and so far the results have shown little or no artifacts,. i do also the same with Kontakt 3 and still no artifacts that i can hear... there is obviously a good codec being used internally... with logics plug ins they seem to be created with that in mind. with third party plug-ins i see specs that also take that into consideration.


jsd

Oversampling is always the best way on Digital EQs

the converter also use that... and also use Noise reduction similar as Analog DBX
the Motu DDS Clock works at 192 for 48-96... and 176 for 44.1-88.2 (this reduce the Jitter)

obvious there are better converter that require $$$$$

the quality is always related to the value!!!

but we are in 2009 and the new ADDA converters are better because technology is better.... 10 Yers are a lot of time... just think
in 1999 I work with a G4 400!!!

http://src.infinitewave.ca/

this test was update in November 2008

G