Apple Event: May 7th at 7 am PT

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

PDFs from Pages - Won't allow backgrounds to be added in Acrobat

It seems when I print a Pages document to PDF, I cannot add a background to the PDF in Adobe Acrobat. I noticed that there is an unresolved post about the exact same problem with iWork Pages 06 so it seems, this has never been addressed. Does anyone know how to fix this? I have a PDF of my letterhead that I use as a background and now I cannot.

Mac Pro Dual Quad Core 2.8, Mac OS X (10.5.6), ???

Posted on Jan 20, 2009 11:07 PM

Reply
31 replies

Jan 23, 2009 2:42 AM in response to kencanuck

kencanuck,

I don't have either Word or Open Office installed.

I experimented with Neo Office instead.

It has the transparent text with a page box masking the text and graphics.

Under that is the white page bounding box.

The unusual number of boxes in Pages is what is confusing Acrobat I guess, the watermark is hidden under the 2nd white box.

You'll have to ask Apple why they did it this way.

Jan 23, 2009 2:50 AM in response to kencanuck

PostScript holds all objects in bounding boxes, the page itself is just another.

Without the page bounding box it would be hard to position all the other text and graphics which all relate to its limits, just as objects or text within other boxes relate to the limits of their bounding box.

It is like Russian dolls.

The programmer uses as many boxes as "objects" he/she thinks they need to contain.

Or it is a mistake. Not unusual with identically sized objects stacked on top of each other.

Jan 23, 2009 2:55 AM in response to PeterBreis0807

So in Pages, the box has a default white background? ... and why do I not have this problem when I print to PDF using a different word processing application? As someone else suggested, it is some problem with Pages in how the layers of boxes is ordered - that the white "background box" isn't defaulted to the very bottom of the layers?

I'm not sure I'm getting it. LOL!

Jan 23, 2009 3:17 AM in response to PeterBreis0807

It isn't really a "problem" it is a matter of what the user is trying to achieve.


Right.

The confusion comes from not knowing how the imaging model works. In the imaging model there is a concept of objects and of placing an object over or under another object.

Adobe PostScript is intended for low memory print rendering, so instead of holding 5-10-20-100 high stacks in memory and calculating transparency from e.g. object 50 down to object 1, Adobe PostScript has a rough and ready solution: Obscure objects under other objects.

Adobe PDF 4.0, like Apple GX 1.0, does this differently. Transparency can be applied to any object at any position in the object stack. The objects under the object to which transparency is applied will show through as specified by the transparency setting.

(Nifty memory management let Apple GX 1.0 do this for low memory Macs, too.)

A background is an object like any other object, that is, it has to have a place in the stack. If a 'pending approval' or other background mark is applied, then it can be done automatically in the process of generating the Adobe PDF or Apple PDD, or manually.

It if is done manually, it can be done on the master page of the document being assembled. This provides more design control. If it is done automatically, it can be done by applying a filter in the printer driver. This provides less design control.

If the O.P. wants a watermark behind their letter (not a brilliant effect on screen) then they need to make the text block over it transparent.


Normally, one would have a mark instead of bullets, or as a lead for page numbers, or something like that. The special sorts tray is special - and what is special is best kept small and out of the way of the copy. Having a mark as background on every page seems a terrible idea typographically.

/hh

Jan 23, 2009 3:39 AM in response to kencanuck

Okay, I found out how. However, it doesn't seem to work right. The instructions say to select the object and select Arrange > Send Objects to Background, which should do so and automatically make it non-selectable. Unfortunately, it does NOT make the object non-selectable. No matter what I do, I can still select and move the object. Even the checkbox that says "background objects are selectable" in the wrap inspector is unchecked.

Anyone know what's going on?

Jan 23, 2009 10:51 AM in response to PeterBreis0807

PeterBreis0807 wrote:
I pulled apart the Pages document pdf (Typewriter resume) in Illustrator CS4.


Using Layers, right?

This is the postscript stack, foremost on top:

4. Text
3. Transparent bounding box
2. White page box
1. White page box

Back in Acrobat I added a watermark to the background, which was not visible as before.

As I now knew how many layers there were, I cleared the spare background boxes with:

+Acrobat > Menu > Tools > Advanced Editing > *Touchup Object Tool*+ not the *Select Object Tool*

With this I clicked on the background and highlighted the bounding box (transparent) which I deleted. and then clicked on and deleted the 2 two white background boxes.

The watermark is now visible.


Clever! That works fine!

The only thing that annoys me is that one had to use Illustrator's Layers to find the boxes. I would have expected/hoped them to show up in Acrobat's Document > Examine... dialogue.

Well, one cannot get everything, I guess.

Jan 23, 2009 12:13 PM in response to Tom Gewecke

Yeah, there is and I've figured it out. I just placed my letterhead PDF into a Pages document, sent it to the background, then locked it into place. I then saved it as a Template so now I can do up my business letters properly.

However, the problem with not being able to easily add a background because of the apparent "extra" layers created by Pages is still annoying. I often type my letter so I can actually print them so I would just lay it out on a blank page. Then, occasionally, I have to email the same letter and the easiest thing to do was to PDF the letter and add the background in Acrobat. Pages now forces me to go back into Pages, and add the background there, adding more steps to the process (import object, resize, reposition, send to background and republish as PDF). In Acrobat, I would just print to PDF and add background.

Jan 23, 2009 7:02 PM in response to Magnus Lewan

Magnus,

As much as I use Acrobat for what I have to (since v 1.0), it has always struck me as very badly written and designed app., and not getting any better. 🙂

The boxes do not turn up as layers in Illustrator, just as stacked objects in the same layer. I just peeled them apart.

I am not sure if I did get the stack order right, as soon as I get home I'll have another go colorising the boxes as I go so I can see the order better.

Jan 23, 2009 6:59 PM in response to kencanuck

Here is an idea kencanuck:

Add the water mark as a background layer in Pages and decide whether you want it not-visible or visible by default. Then set the opacity to 0% or not, only turning it back to visible when you want to make the .pdf for emailing.

Just think through the problem to find solutions with the tools to hand.

For most things there is no big magic button that you just press and it reads your mind.

Jan 24, 2009 12:49 AM in response to PeterBreis0807

PeterBreis0807 wrote:
The boxes do not turn up as layers in Illustrator, just as stacked objects in the same layer. I just peeled them apart.

I am not sure if I did get the stack order right, as soon as I get home I'll have another go colorising the boxes as I go so I can see the order better.


Yes, when I try the same thing with a blank document with just the text "hello", I get just one layer with one group with the following content:

text: hello
path with opaque white filling
path with opaque white filling
clipping path - transparent

PDFs from Pages - Won't allow backgrounds to be added in Acrobat

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.