Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

ChronoSync vs Synchronize! Pro X

I bought Synch ProX a couple of years ago and used it to make bootable backups. Now the license is expired and I am again looking for an easy solution to keep my MacBook Pro and my home iMac totally in synch. Any thoughts on which package is better for this. Chronos is $40 and renewing my Synch Pro X license is $49...

MacBook Pro 17" Intel 2.33 2GB RAM, Mac OS X (10.5.6)

Posted on Apr 16, 2009 2:47 PM

Reply
Question marked as Best reply

Posted on Apr 19, 2009 9:45 AM

I've never run Synch Pro X, but have been running ChronoSync for about a year now. Perusing the Qdea site, I don't see any features listed that CS doesn't have.

One other point, in the time I've had CS, I've upgraded from v3.x to v4.0 for free. That may be the only difference I see -- the SPX license is much more restrictive wrt upgrades. For the initial price of SPX plus one 2 year upgrade plus $10, you could have bought CS licenses for 5 machines that won't expire.
3 replies
Question marked as Best reply

Apr 19, 2009 9:45 AM in response to Bill Evans2

I've never run Synch Pro X, but have been running ChronoSync for about a year now. Perusing the Qdea site, I don't see any features listed that CS doesn't have.

One other point, in the time I've had CS, I've upgraded from v3.x to v4.0 for free. That may be the only difference I see -- the SPX license is much more restrictive wrt upgrades. For the initial price of SPX plus one 2 year upgrade plus $10, you could have bought CS licenses for 5 machines that won't expire.

ChronoSync vs Synchronize! Pro X

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.