Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

VMware Fusion's "Split into 2 GB files" and Time Machine

Hi everyone,

does anybody know for sure it Fusion's option to split VMs into 2 GB files make for a more efficient TM backup?

I know that normally the VM image is seen as 1 large file by TM and therefore gets backuped again if you just had the VM open without doing anything.

Is splitting the VM image into 2 GB chunks avoiding this so that (ideally, without doing much in the VM) I end up with just one or two 2 GB files being backuped? Or will all of the 2 GB files be backuped every single time I ran the VM?

Thanks
Björn

MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.7), 30" ACD

Posted on May 26, 2009 6:47 AM

Reply
Question marked as Best reply

Posted on May 26, 2009 8:37 AM

2 GB is still a fairly big chunk.

One way to tell would be to test it, using the TimeTracker app, from www.charlessoft.com.
It shows most of the files saved by TM for each backup (excluding some hidden/system files, etc.).
4 replies

May 26, 2009 11:39 AM in response to Björn Herrmann

Splitting to 2GB sounds like a workaround for people who want to store their virtual machines on a FAT filesystem (so that it can be easily shared between a Mac and Windows machine). The FAT filesystem cannot store files larger than 4GB, and it's usually safer to limit to 2GB.

Time machine looks for files that have changed, and backs them up if they have changed. For a 32GB virtual machine, you'll have sixteen 2GB files. Probably at least two or three of them will change every time you use the VM, even if you hardly do anything. So this solution will sort of work, but you'll still be eating up space pretty fast on your Time Machine volume.

I store all of my virtual machines on a sparsebundle disk image. This is a mounted filesystem that seamlessly breaks up the filesystem into many 8MB files. That level of granularity keeps my TM backups small. For example, I have three individual VMs stored on a single sparsebundle volume. They currently occupy 3012 individual 8MB "bundle" files. The last time I used those VMs, I ran software updates on all of them. A total of 118 of those 8MB files changed as a result of the updates, so the TM backup was 944MB. If they were not on a sparsebundle volume, the TM backup would have been about 24GB.

I use Parallels, but the same concept should apply to any application that creates and frequently updates very large files. Use Disk Utility to create the sparsebundle volume.

May 26, 2009 1:29 PM in response to edclange

Yes, VMware does mention that the intention of the 2 GB splitting is for FAT filesystems. But I was thinking to use it for TM since I currently do backup my VMs manually only on rare occasions. You might be right about several 2 GB chunks changing even without doing much in the VM, so I'll forget about this.

But using a sparsebundle, that's a very good idea! Sometimes the most obvious things won't come to my mind. That's even better because of the much smaller parts and it's happening on file system level and not via software.

Thanks a lot!
Björn

VMware Fusion's "Split into 2 GB files" and Time Machine

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.