Thoughts on Panasonic HVX200A camera

I currently shoot on Sony XDCAM HD using the Sony PDW-F330 camera and am considering purchasing a smaller camera. The 200A has tweaked my interest. I cannot get a hands on demo in the near future. Any thoughts on that camera, the P2 workflow etc. I did demo the Sony EX-3 and hated the ergonomics. Not good for handheld use at all IMHO. I have found a few reviews but I would love some input from the always knowledgeable folks on this forum. Any thoughts?

Thanks in advance.
Best,
Tom

Mac Pro 3.2 8 core, Mac OS X (10.5.5), 30" Cinema. AJA Kona 3

Posted on Jun 8, 2009 11:36 AM

Reply
8 replies

Jun 8, 2009 12:13 PM in response to Thomas Whaley

I love the camera...I love the format it shoots DVCPRO HD 4:2:2 Intra-Frame...vs long GOP 4:2:0 INTER-Frame. But I cannot argue that the EX3 shoots full raster 1920x1080 vs the HVX-200A and 1280x1080. And I cannot argue that the EX3 shoots a sharper and clearer image. But there is slight rolling shutter issues (that people have said they can live with). But it shoots a great image.

The HVX-200A also shoots a great image, although not QUITE as sharp (less scanlines), but is I-Frame and 4:2:2. The only thing that I don't like about the P2 workflow is the cost of the cards. BUT, with the new E-series cards, the cost has dropped significantly.

But I am a big fan of the workflow. That camera is what caused me to start my blog, www.LFHD.net. Read what i have to say about that camera and the workflow there...start at the beginnning.

Shane

User uploaded file

Jun 8, 2009 12:17 PM in response to Thomas Whaley

Hi,

I love my HVX200, but if I were purchasing today, I would actually get an HPX-170,
which is rather like the next generation. Here's an excellent review:
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/hpx_170_evolutionbrockett.html

A big difference is that the HPX-170 does not have a miniDV drive.
Even though I do all my own work using the P2 cards, most of my paying jobs
want mini DVs. Go figure.

I have found the P2 workflow to be flawless.

The HVX-200, like any 1/3" sensor camera is noisy in low-light situations.
You get what you pay for.

The DVCPRO HD codec is fabulous, ready to edit, seems much nicer that Sony's HDV codec.

The only ergonomic problem I have with the HVX-200 is the orientation of the
menu navigtion buttons. They are hard to get used to, but once you start
shooting, you don't need to worry about them.

You can get more detailed opinions from www.hvxuser.com.

Cheerio,
Les

Jun 8, 2009 12:29 PM in response to Thomas Whaley

Hi,
The choice of a cemera always depends on many factors, which order of importance depend on the user experience and interest.
In a nutshell one of the main factors is the type of production the camera will be used for .
Since you are asking specifically about this camera:

Lets say (just as an example) you make a living mainly on live recordings.

The HVX is not the best choice for that although you can still do it providing yourself with 16/32GB cards or firestores (mmmmh a bit expensive). Also the HVX is not incredibly good with very low light.

However, apart from that, personally, I have no reason to complain about anything about the camera. It is simply an excellent camera, extremely versatile on many departments. I use it for Documentaries, Promos, Corporate, Music Videos, Shorts and even Animation. The HVX can shoot if you wish a single frame at a time and even one every several minutes (just as an example).
Color Space (4:2:2) gives you more freedom when colour correcting, the reds are unbelievably vivid. The camera allows you to setup 6 different scenes to use on specific occasions. Shoots DCPRO HD in dozens of flavours and even on Mini DV tape if you like (or downconvert from HD to DV on camera).
To list all the great features the camera has would require quite a bit of more time.

I have to acknowledge that the EX is an incredible camera too, I have recently Colour Graded a video for a client and had no issues at all in Color.

There is no way you’d make a mistake in buying an HVX unless the two scenarios described at the beginning of this post are frequent characteristic of your work.

At the end of the day it might be worth to hire/borrow the camera or both cameras one week or so and compare their pros and cons.

G.

Jun 8, 2009 1:49 PM in response to Thomas Whaley

The ergonomics on the EX1 and EX3 aren't very good. But the picture quality, low light performance and image controls are absolutely great, in my opinion. Get a great shoulder mount and most of the ergonomic woes go away or are diminished.

And, the SxS card fits in the new Mac laptops. And, with the MR reader technology, I have 16GB of memory for about $75. I have the Sony cards (two 8s and a 16) but the other two 16GB cards were the cheap fixture that accepts the SDHC chips. Great solution and very affordable!

Jun 9, 2009 2:38 PM in response to Thomas Whaley

If you're used to a real ENG chassis with a real lens that has hard stops, you're in for a learning curve. The ergonomics of these little wrist held camcorders has a lot to be desired but quite honestly the worst part is the lens.

I'm not one to recommend any Sony mpeg format over a Panasonic I-frame format but if you're really used to a full frame camera, the 170 will really disappoint in every way from an operational paradigm.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Thoughts on Panasonic HVX200A camera

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.