Old man needs your input on a second monitor for older iMac

I work on my old (late '06) 1.83 GHz Intel iMac 17" doing some graphic design (advanced amateur) for non-profits w/CS2. As my skill level grows, so does my need for a second larger monitor. I'm looking for advice on purchasing a 23/24" monitor with the highest resolution this machine can support. Of course, wonder of wonders, there are scant resources ($$$). Any suggestions for this old timer with the failing eyesight?
Thanks
Larry

imac Intel late '06, Mac OS X (10.4.11)

Posted on Jun 19, 2009 10:35 AM

Reply
5 replies

Jun 19, 2009 12:45 PM in response to barney buoy

If there is a computer surplus store nearby, and you are able to transport something that is relatively heavy, you can consider a large used pro-quality CRT display. A 21-inch CRT (about 19-20 inches viewable) should be able to do 1600x1200 resolution. People don't like CRTs these days, so cost should be minimal, as long as you don't need to get it shipped (very heavy).

The good thing about CRTs is that they are multi-sync. That means they look equally sharp a different resolutions, so you can set it for 1600x1200, 1280x960, 1024x768, 800x600, etc. depending on what you are doing (and how your eyes are doing). The lower the res, the larger things will look on the screen. If you change resolution from the native res on an LCD display, things get fuzzy.

The bad thing about CRTs is that they typically use more power when active and they obviously take up more physical space.

I have a 21-inch Sun-branded (Sony tube) CRT (usually set to 1600x1200) and it is my main display. It has a flat screen that is really sharp. My 17-inch iMac is off to the right as the secondary display.

For a new LCD display, you should look at options with lower pixel density. For example, there are 19-inch LCDs that have 1440x900 resolution. This is the same resolution as your iMac's 17-inch LCD spread out over a 19-inch screen, so things will look larger. I have also seen 22-inch LCDs at 1680x1050, which is usually the resolution on a 20-inch display.

Jun 19, 2009 11:53 PM in response to barney buoy

If you want to pick up an LCD, you really need to consider two things:

1) The physical size of the screen (e.g. 24")

2) The number of pixels (e.g. 1024 x 768)

It seems you have settled on a screen size, so I'll move to the second point.

If the screen supports a high number of pixels, relative to its size (a good example of this would be a Macbook with a 13.3" display and 1280x800 pixels), text will appear small, and you'll be using the computer with a magnifying glass.

However, I don't think this will be such an issue on larger displays. My advice is for you to browse the electronics stores asking for demonstrations of particular displays to find out which ones meet your needs. Record the make and model, and shop around for the best deal.

You worked out Apple forums, so you must be quite savvy!

Jun 20, 2009 11:08 AM in response to PJB

Thank you so much to both Kenichi and PJB. You have both been very kind and generous with your time. Judging by your replies, a bit more information seems to be in order, if you'd permit me.
My resources are limited to about $500. I should have stated that up front--I saw monitor prices at $1000+ and thought I might be excluded altogether. A crt sounds good, but I really don't have the space. I put my sights on 23"/24" inch simply assuming bigger would make things easier to see. I am a bit confused now about resolution. Here is how I work: In InDesign, I generally magnify my work piece to 300% to see the detail I need (I also use a 10 diopter visor to further magnify). With the material that large, the palettes are always hiding parts of the work and I am constantly maneuvering windows or palettes to see what I'm working on. Additionally, when I need to pull a menu or work on a palette, I have to use zoom text , which further distorts and confuses the workspace. My hope was that I could put the palettes on one screen and have them large enough to see, and have my main screen at 300-400% without all the clutter. So maybe the solution is not necessarily physical size of the second monitor, but rather resolution? I hope this helps and doesn't frustrate you fine folks. Any further help would greatly be appreciated.
Thank you again
Larry

Jun 20, 2009 12:44 PM in response to barney buoy

Since you are using other methods to magnify what is displayed, resolution is probably less important. The resolution gives two numbers. The first number is how many pixels fit left to right. The second number is how many pixels fit top to bottom. So if the physical size of the display is larger, each pixel will be a bit larger. Therefore, text and images will appear larger. But the effect is not close to being 300%, so the methods you are using will overwhelm any effect from getting a larger screen with a slightly lower native resolution.

There are plenty of display display being sold for well under $500 these days. Dealmac.com is a good place to look for deals across the web.

http://dealmac.com/categories/Computer/Peripherals/Monitors/Flat-Panel-LCDs/76.h tml

You will need to note the type of connection used by the display. Some of the cheaper ones may only have a VGA connector. If it has VGA only, you will need this adapter.

http://store.apple.com/us/product/M9320G/A?mco=NDcxOTM0Mw

There is nothing wrong with VGA (CRTs mostly use VGA connectors), but you will probably get better output (to an LCD display) if the display has a DVI connector, which is digital (VGA is analog). To connect over DVI, you will need this adapter.

http://store.apple.com/us/product/M9321G/B?mco=NDcxMTE5NA

There are some newer cheaper displays that use LCDs designed for HDTV sets. They have 1920x1080 resolution. Some of these displays only have an HDMI connector. HDMI is used on HDTVs. You can use these displays with yet another type of adapter, but it would be best to get one with DVI, if possible. But if you want to get one with only an HDMI connector, please post back.

Jun 20, 2009 1:15 PM in response to barney buoy

LCD monitors are fixed resolution. That is, the monitor supports exactly a certain number of horizontal and vertical pixels and nothing else.

Your iMac can support up to 1920x1200.

I would recommend that you go to Staples, Office Depot, etc. and buy the 23/24-inch monitor that looks best to you.
For example:
Staples has HP W2338H 23.3" Widescreen LCD Monitor (1920x1080) for $250
Office Depot has LG W2600V-PF - LCD display - TFT - 25.5" (1920 x 1200) for $490
Office Max has Acer x233hbid 23" Widescreen LCD Monitor (1920x1080) $190
Best Buy has Samsung - 23" Widescreen Flat-Panel LCD HD Monitor Model: P2370 (1920x1080) for $270

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Old man needs your input on a second monitor for older iMac

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.