Turn off fraction simplification in iWork '08 Numbers

Hi everyone!

I am trying to enter my course and assessment results into a Numbers worksheet, and am running into an annoying problem. Everytime I try to enter a fraction like 60/60 or 51/60, Numbers will automatically simplify the fraction. This is nice where it's needed, but I don't want this to happen for this file. I know this is probably a really simple problem to solve, but how do I turn of this simplification? I want to try to keep the 'fraction' style just so it is technically able to change and reformat easily in the future.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Unibody MacBook Pro 15 Inch Intel Core 2 Duo 2.53GHz (Late 2008), Mac OS X (10.5.7)

Posted on Jun 27, 2009 4:33 AM

Reply
15 replies

Jun 27, 2009 5:29 AM in response to Badunit

Two caveats to it being formatted as text: 1) Strings don't always act like numbers and 2) any math you do will result in a either a decimal formatted number or a reduced fraction, depending on the cell format you choose.

B2= 51/60 (a string)
B3= 51/60 (a string)
B4= B2+B3 = 1.7 or 1 7/10 (not 102/60 or 1 42/60)
B5=SUM(B2:B3)= 0 (oops)

Jun 27, 2009 7:19 AM in response to KOENIG Yvan

KOENIG Yvan wrote:


B4= value(B2)+value(B3) --> 0.85

What happened there? It worked out to 1.7 for me.

B5= SUM(value(B2),value(B3)) --> 1.7

I was attempting to demonstrate that a range/array reference wouldn't work.
B5=SUM(1 B2,1B3) also works but I don't know how to do an array reference.

My recommendation is to have a second column (which can be hidden) that converts the strings to numbers and to use that column for all calculations. If the results of calculations need to be fractions with a specified denominator, they'll have to be converted to strings via functions such as MOD

C2=51/60 (a string)
D2=VALUE(C2)
E2=IF(D2<0,"-","")&IF(ABS(D2)>=1,ROUNDDOWN(D2,0)&" ","")&IF(ROUND(MOD(ABS(D2) 60,60),0)>0,ROUND(MOD(ABS(D2)60,60),0) &"/60","")

Perhaps that formula is more complex than it needs to be. This was my first shot at ensuring it worked for positive and negative (though zero creates a blank).

Jun 27, 2009 7:55 AM in response to Badunit

Badunit wrote:
KOENIG Yvan wrote:


B4= value(B2)+value(B3) --> 0.85

What happened there? It worked out to 1.7 for me.


Oops, I reported the result of the formula:
B4= value(B2)

B5= SUM(value(B2),value(B3)) --> 1.7

I was attempting to demonstrate that a range/array reference wouldn't work.
B5=SUM(1 B2,1B3) also works but I don't know how to do an array reference.


OK, I didn't understood it this way … for the simple reason that _there is no defined array structure_ in Numbers.
1*(B2:B5) means nothing in Numbers' world
value(B2:B5) means nothing too.

Here, B2:B5 is not an array, it's a range and there is no defined arithmetic operation applying to suc a range.

My recommendation is to have a second column (which can be hidden) that converts the strings to numbers and to use that column for all calculations.


Sure, it's the best soluce.
My first idea was to enter numbers and use an aux column to display fractions but it requires that both columns are visible.
Entering strings then converting them give the ability to hide the converted values (with the advantage that we have no need to treat the special case of empty strings converted as 0)

Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE samedi 27 juin 2009 16:55:38)

Jul 8, 2009 12:24 AM in response to KOENIG Yvan

I can see that, thank you.
That is what I was looking for; you must admit the explanation was a little long winded, and would be much to complex for a user just getting started with the Mac, or without a clear understanding of spreadsheets. I simply skimmed the responses due to the overload of information which I think was mostly irrelevant to my question, yes, it's nice to know, but all I really wanted was a short response, which was finally provided in the last message.
I think perhaps that the best solution will be to stick with what I have afterall, I think having to add extra stuff to reach a final solution is very un-Mac like.

Jul 15, 2009 2:43 PM in response to KOENIG Yvan

Look, I understand all the working behind it, it's not that. It's just my answer was buried in the middle of it all, and I was skimming because in the 12 hours between checking all the initial answers (about 5 posts) had gone up. Besides, time is a limited resources while your studying at university, and you initially skim all your readings while researching, so it continues to make sense in this circumstance. And believe me, I can read more that 20 words (I had to proof read 20000, and that was just one of 6 assignments, so trust me when I say I can read). This was also my first use of a forum anywhere EVER so I think you can empathise with that. Personally, I would have found it easier to find if the actual suggested answer was contained in it's own post after showing the working, I would have found the answer no problem.

Jul 16, 2009 8:18 AM in response to smartypants120

When we respond on the forum, we can't guess what the asker really need.
We don't know what is already its knowledge about the problem.
Often we don't kow if the way we understand the question is what the asker was really trying to ask.

More, if your time is precious, our is precious too.
So, we may hope that you are able to understand (sometimes I'm not sure of that) that we tried to do our best to respond given our skills in Numbers (and in English).
If you can't accept that, you may ask the help of appointed consultants !

Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE jeudi 16 juillet 2009 17:18:28)

Jul 19, 2009 6:37 AM in response to smartypants120

I notice that this forum is no different from others I've attended over the decades ...people get a bit antsy at times. I've used PCs for decades, helping people with spreadsheets of another kind which won't be named here, and am now just beginning with Mac, so if I'm off track, forgive me.

For fractions to look textbook format I usually spent some time combining several cells. For example. For a mixed fraction, I'd have the whole number in a merged cell from two, one above the other and the proportional part in the two cells to the right, one above the other, each justified left/right appropriately. The top cell would have a lower border as the fraction dividing line which has a proper name that eludes me at the moment. That way, numerical calculations can be performed readily well, with a little effort at times to produce required results. If I can get the file to transfer from Window to Mac, as some have with no problem, I could upload one for example ... if it is possible to upload here ... I'm still learning. Such endeavour might take a little time, but it's the end result that matters in the long run.

Message was edited by: AlbertEinstein

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Turn off fraction simplification in iWork '08 Numbers

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.