Well, Rick, in what way are you qualified to judge assistive technology?
You have a "friend who is blind and he uses JAWS". I have a wife who is totally blind and uses VoiceOver—as a professional translator. I know scores of blind people happily using VoiceOver and the Mac in professional and private circumstances. Some of them would scoff at scanning, OCRing and reading 30-40 pages a night as a distinct sign of under-achievement.
Large numbers of VoiceOver users are "switchers", having abandoned the JAWS/PC platform in sheer frustration at its inadequacies, instability, and complexity, not to mention the way it forces blind users to interact with a computer in a completely different way from their sighted colleagues and friends.
If you want some idea of the phenomenal energy and enthusiasm of the blind VoiceOver user community, have a look at Josh de Lioncourt's
Mac-cessibility website, or Keith Reedy's
I Can Work This Thing, both run by totally blind VoiceOver users. And if you can read French, have a look at my wife's site,
CeciMac.
You speak in disparaging terms of Apple's efforts in assistive needs; are you aware that in just four years, Apple has produced a screen reader that is not only stable, reliable and usable, but does not ghettoise the blind user? There is only one factor hindering the wholesale take-up of VoiceOver, and that is the lack of accessibility to one suite — Microsoft Office.
You may also be unaware of the contempt with which many blind people regard "assistive technology" companies; their prices are usually excessive, their attitudes patronising, and their stranglehold on the disabled user unbreakable—until VoiceOver.
Finally, you may also be surprised to learn of the large numbers of blind people taking to the iPhone 3 GS — which runs VoiceOver too — and not all of them are Mac users either. As a result, quite a sizeable proportion of them have started saying "My next computer's going to be a Mac".
Your patronising attitude to blind people is rather unbecoming, not to say outdated.