JROA wrote:
65536??? WHY???
Because it's 16^4, which is an integer which may be coded with four bytes.
The step beyond would be 16^6 or 16^8.
But, given the slowness of Numbers, I am unable to work with tables of 10000 rows.
From my point of view, it would be foolish to build tables with 65536 rows with the current app.
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) jeudi 24 décembre 2009 23:55:34