Real-World Performance: i5 vs i7
_Geekbench (64-bit)_
3.06 C2D ~ 4700
2.66 i5 ~ 7400
2.8 i7 ~ 9600
The i7 nearly matches the Mac Pro (with the $500 2.93 Ghz processor upgrade!).
I've been ready to upgrade for years now. My 1.42 Ghz G4 Mac mini has served me well since the spring of 2005 but it just can't keep up anymore. It's been utterly reliable, stable, and has aged better than any PC I've owned, but it's paltry 80 GB 4200 rpm HD, 512 MB of RAM and OS 10.3 ⚠ are definitely holding back my experience.
I've committed myself to buying a new iMac next week, either an i5 or i7. As impressive as the i7 is, would its real-world advantage mirror the impressive benchmarks or turn out to be a ~10% increase? I don't use expensive, cutting-edge software that would be able to utilize hyperthreading or perhaps even multiple cores. These benchmarks utilize every iota of power that these processors can provide and exploit all their functions. In a real-world setting, say, rendering a scene in Cinema 4D or a movie in iMovie, would the difference be all that noticeable? Futureproofing is a top concern of mine. I'd prefer to buy the best I can afford and enjoy using it for years and years. If I kept the iMac for five years, the i7 would cost be about ten cents per day over the i5.
How important will it be to have hyperthreading? The i5 lacks it. Does anyone know if the i5 runs cooler than the i7?
Some of these tests showed the 3.33 C2D outperforming the i5, but not the i7:
http://eshop.macsales.com/Reviews/Framework.cfm?page=/Benchmarks/iMacSnowBench.h tml
This greatly concerns me. I'm leaning towards the i7, but I'm not ruling out the i5. Any input would be appreciated.
Mac mini G4 1.42 Ghz, Mac OS X (10.3.x)