Skip navigation
This discussion is archived

Pages and Grammar Check

2805 Views 14 Replies Latest reply: Dec 14, 2009 8:54 AM by KOENIG Yvan RSS
Marc135791967 Level 1 Level 1 (30 points)
Currently Being Moderated
Dec 13, 2009 6:51 AM
Hello All,

Here is an "old habits die hard" sort of thing. I'm new to Pages (I've been using Word since the dawn of time), and I'm finding the grammar check to be less than what I'm used to. It doesn't recognize fragment sentences (eg, When I go to the store. I will pick up milk), and verb tense errors. Is there a setting that I haven't found that will accomplish this?

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

Marc
iMac, Mac OS X (10.6.2)
  • Level 8 Level 8 (41,760 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 13, 2009 8:26 AM (in response to Marc135791967)
    As far as I know, Pages is not delivered with a Grammar Checker, just a Spell Checker.
    If you want a Grammar Checker you must byuy one from a third party editor.

    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) dimanche 13 décembre 2009 17:25:57
    To be the AW6 successor, iWork MUST integrate a TRUE DB, not a list organizer !, Mac OS X (10.4.11)
  • Peggy Level 8 Level 8 (38,085 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 13, 2009 8:45 AM (in response to Marc135791967)
    Pages does have a "proof-reader" which is not the same as a grammar checker, but is more/different than the spell checker.

    24" 2.4GHz iMac; 15" unibody MacBook Pro 2.4GHz; G5 2.3GHz; 3G iPhone; TV, Mac OS X (10.6.2), 2GB iPod nano, 30GB 5G iPod, 17" G5 iMac, G4/700 iMac, PB 1400, Apple IIgs
  • Magnus Lewan Level 4 Level 4 (3,655 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 13, 2009 9:19 AM (in response to Marc135791967)
    tempusfugit13579 wrote:
    Is there a setting that I haven't found that will accomplish this?


    I'm afraid not. Those checks are simply not available in Pages.
    MacBook, 4GB, 1067 MHz, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M, Mac OS X (10.6)
  • Level 8 Level 8 (41,760 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 13, 2009 9:37 AM (in response to Peggy)
    I don't see a real difference between SpellChecher and ProofReader.
    But maybe it's because I tested on French text with which both flag only some typos.

    The French User Guide translates _Proof Reader_ by _Correcteur grammatical_ which is absolutely wrong.

    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) dimanche 13 décembre 2009 18:37:12
    To be the AW6 successor, iWork MUST integrate a TRUE DB, not a list organizer !, Mac OS X (10.4.11)
  • Tom Gewecke Level 9 Level 9 (70,850 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 13, 2009 9:51 AM (in response to KOENIG Yvan)
    I don't see a real difference between SpellChecher and ProofReader.
    But maybe it's because I tested on French text with which both flag only some typos.


    It will also tell you if you have used the wrong article for the gender of the word. That's more than spellchecking.
    iMac Intel/2C2D, eMac G4/700, Mac OS X (10.6), 10.5, 10.4, 10.3, 9.2
  • Level 8 Level 8 (41,760 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 13, 2009 10:05 AM (in response to Tom Gewecke)
    It seems that it never found such an error when I type in French

    As far as I know, If we want true Grammar Checking in French, we must use

    Antidote, Correcteur 101 or ProLexis (in alphabetic order because I am unable to decide which one is the best).

    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) dimanche 13 décembre 2009 19:04:51
    To be the AW6 successor, iWork MUST integrate a TRUE DB, not a list organizer !, Mac OS X (10.4.11)
  • PeterBreis0807 Level 7 Level 7 (27,350 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 13, 2009 11:06 AM (in response to Marc135791967)
    I am of the view that if you need a grammar checker then your education was a waste of time.

    Language is a skill and an exercise in variety and modulation just like music.

    A mechanical "correction" of what you do ends up like a middy music, stilted, flat and mechanical. Not to mention often wrong.

    Peter
    Aluminium iMac 24" 2.8Ghz, Mac OS X (10.5.8), The closest you'll ever get to there, is here.
  • Magnus Lewan Level 4 Level 4 (3,655 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 13, 2009 11:29 AM (in response to PeterBreis0807)
    PeterBreis0807 wrote:

    Language is a skill and an exercise in variety and modulation just like music.

    A mechanical "correction" of what you do ends up like a middy music, stilted, flat and mechanical. Not to mention often wrong.


    Interesting comparison. Did you ever participate in a musical ensemble? A band, an orchestra, a choir? I have seen quite a lot of printed music, where the editor could have made good use of a musical grammar check. Imagine a piece of classical music where the choir has rehearsed a particular chord as a c-major. But when they get to rehearse together, it turns out that the accompanying orchestra has a c-minor chord at that same place. If the editor had used some sort of musical grammar check, he would have found the discrepancy before the music was printed and distributed around the world. At least that's what I thinks.
    MacBook, 4GB, 1067 MHz, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M, Mac OS X (10.6)
  • PeterBreis0807 Level 7 Level 7 (27,350 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 13, 2009 11:38 AM (in response to Magnus Lewan)
    I believe in sub-editors or literate better halves to check your work and take into account your intent.

    All the grammar checkers I have seen butcher good language. As has been amply demonstrated when run on the Gettysburg Address or Churchill's war time speeches.

    Using crutches, when you are not an invalid, makes you one.

    Their air moor spilling areas then heavy B4, despot the spilling chuckers.

    Peter
    Aluminium iMac 24" 2.8Ghz, Mac OS X (10.5.8), The closest you'll ever get to there, is here.
  • PeterBreis0807 Level 7 Level 7 (27,350 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 13, 2009 6:11 PM (in response to Marc135791967)
    I understand what you are saying but remind you that with spelling checkers as a crutch people in practice are far worse spellers than ever.

    The same with Grammar, no good pointing to worthy examples when 99.9% of users take the attitude the software will:

    1 Pick them up on their slackness

    2 There is no accompanying explanation that they can follow

    3 It leads them to argue with people who do know what they are doing "But my grammar checker says…"

    The musical analogy is not apt here.

    Better would be karaoke software that straightens out your caterwauling and drowns it in decibels to hide the mistakes. The resultant delusional talents then turn up in Albanian Idol.

    peter
    Aluminium iMac 24" 2.8Ghz, Mac OS X (10.5.8), The closest you'll ever get to there, is here.
  • Level 8 Level 8 (41,760 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 14, 2009 8:54 AM (in response to Marc135791967)
    tempusfugit13579 wrote:
    Perhaps we can agree to disagree on the philosophy of this but simply agree that if you want a grammar checker Pages just don't got it.


    I disagree with the second proposal.

    If we want to use Pages and a Grammar checker, just buy both of them.

    Pages is delivered in 15 localized versions.
    At this time foreign users are bored to see that they have no localized dictionary when you English speaking user have one.
    It would be worse if Apple get a licence for a grammar checker which for sure would be only an English one.
    How much would be the cost of the package if it was embedding 15 dictionaries and 15 grammar checkers ?

    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) lundi 14 décembre 2009 17:54:11
    To be the AW6 successor, iWork MUST integrate a TRUE DB, not a list organizer !, Mac OS X (10.4.11)

Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Legend

  • This solved my question - 10 points
  • This helped me - 5 points
This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.