4x3 vs 16x9 on Sony VX2100

I have a question for anyone that has used or may know about the Sony VX2100.

The camera normally shoots in a SD 4x3 mode but does offer the ability to shoot in 16x9. My question is, if I choose to use the 16x9 mode am I losing any resolution or quality by using 16x9? I filmed a few things the other day and upon playback I seemed to notice a little reduction in quality (saw some horizontal lines and image issues). Any input is appreciated.

iMac Core 2 Duo 2.33GHz, Mac OS X (10.5.2)

Posted on Jan 5, 2010 5:43 PM

Reply
12 replies

Jan 5, 2010 6:00 PM in response to 27993buck

Going by that camera's price point, it should shoot real Anamorphic 16:9 and not a fake "letterbox" effect.
Anamorphic uses the same number of pixels as 4:3 but the image is stretched horizontally on playback. That would cause a negligable reduction of horizontal resolution -the same number of pixels being spread over a wider "screen" size.

As the DV format uses a 5:1 compression ratio, that should hardly be noticable.
What are your Easy Setup and Sequence Settings in FCP?
How are you viewing the footage?

Jan 5, 2010 7:45 PM in response to Nick Holmes

I was only previewing some of the footage on the tv through another camera and have not imported the footage onto FCP yet. I can't remember which Anamorphic setting I used but I was under the assumption that the 2100 shot in a native 4x3 and that I had to change the settings to 16x9 if I didn't want to strech the picture. I did notice when I changed to widescreen or 16x9 on the camera it appeared letterboxed on the viewer. Should I change it make to normal? I am really confused now.

Jan 6, 2010 8:58 AM in response to 27993buck

You need to understand much more about video than you currently do.

All DV/NTSC formats (4:3 and 16:9) record a 720 pixel wide image.

When you record as 4:3, you are using 720 pixels to represent 640 pixels if the pixels were square.

When you record as 16:9, you are using 720 pixels to represent 854 pixels if the pixels were square.

What this means is, in 4:3 images you have more pixels to fill in image detail (720>640).
When dealing with 16:9, you have fewer pixels (720>854) representing a larger area.

On a computer screen, this difference may be noticeable. Once played on a TV, it is not usually so noticeable.

x

Jan 6, 2010 10:18 AM in response to 27993buck

Most DV, without regard to aspect ratio, will look like junk when played on a current HDTV.

There real question is - which aspect ratio fits the story you are telling. For my money, that's the guide.

There's lots of stuff out there that is as clear as a summer's sky and you want to gag after 15 seconds of it.

ymmv. Have fun.

x

And in totally pedantic mode, you are capturing and editing video. Film is a different kettle of fish.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

4x3 vs 16x9 on Sony VX2100

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.