How do I change the maximum number of busses in a Logic 9 Project

Nope, 64 Busses is the maximum, should be plenty though...

I am so curious. How do you use up 64 busses? It's wild, if you're using bus sends on the channel strips, your strips must be miles long. I'd love to see a screen shot, if possible. Mystified.

Do you mean busses or audio tracks?

Message was edited by: samplaire

Hi,

can somebody tell me how to increase the number of sends?
I am trying to create a template and it will only allow 8.

thanks,

In mixer window: (on the left/upper corner) choose "Options" menu then "Create new auxiliary Channel Strips", then a window pops up - enter the desired number of AUXes 🙂

You are all spoiled brats ! 64 busses and 8 sends not enough ? Yeah, no way of working with less than that, right ? You should ask your money back.

Either of you should be locked into a room for a week with a band, a coupla mics, a tape recorder and an 8 channel board with two sends, one post, one pre. After that week, you would have developed some neat ways of working with what you have. Promised.

Christian

You impressed us, Christian, but did it actually help in resolving the problem?

You're Statler and Waldorf, rolled into one... 😉

...and I couldn't agree more.

did it actually help in resolving the problem?

Well, as you aptly suggested the use of another Aux, that leaves the 64bus bit.
You know, in our age (Statler's and Waldorf's), eyesight is deteriorating, and as such, we personally fail to see the problem with being confined to only 64busses.

Christian

EDIT: Actually you didn't, cause the SP was asking for more Sends, not more Auxes. Nevertheless, routing a Track to an Aux gives you eight more Send slots. And 15 more Inserts, should you somehow run out of the 15 you had already.

Message was edited by: christianobermaier

Hi Christian,

I didn't say I agree or disagree with you. That is not the point. I just wanted to say that lecturing people doesn't help. A very well known software manufacturer once said "there will be no need to have more than 768kB of RAM in the future". I also can add that my most favourite computer game was Preliminary Monty on my Atari 800XL. It used 16kB of RAM and was very good. And it had no busses at all 😉

And our age has nothing to do with it. You don't know how old I am, right?

lecturing people doesn't help.

Maybe. But then, helping people in using more than 64 + 8 wouldn't exactly help either, cause the next obvious complaint would be: "Yeah, right, but I need more than 128 busses and more than 16 Sends. 128 + 16 is far too limiting for me". And so on. And on. And on. Instead of ever so slightly shifting one's perspective into making do with what you have.

Christian

samplaire wrote:
A very well known software manufacturer once said "there will be no need to have more than 768kB of RAM in the future".

Which one? 😉

(smart-aleck mode)
There's the infamous "640K" quote, though, which was never actually said:
http://everything2.com/title/640Kought+to+be+enough+foranybody

spheric wrote:
Which one? 😉

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ntr-pw_6C0

(smart-aleck mode)
There's the infamous "640K" quote, though, which was never actually said:
http://everything2.com/title/640Kought+to+be+enough+foranybody

Oops! Sorry 🙂 As they say "too much of not solidified knowledge moulders you"