Skip navigation
This discussion is archived

Why the new Discussions format is so wrong

1424 Views 10 Replies Latest reply: Nov 16, 2005 5:49 PM by A A P L RSS
Terrell Smith Level 4 Level 4 (3,010 points)
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 16, 2005 4:56 AM
This topic is not for what we like or don't like about the new discussions format, nor about what works and doesn't work. It's about philosophy.

Why do people come to the Apple Discussions? Why are the Apple Discussions so popular? What will the new format change?
TiBook 400, 1GB RAM / Dual 1.8 G5, 2 GB RAM, Mac OS X (10.4.3)
  • dwb Level 6 Level 6 (19,705 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2005 8:36 AM (in response to Terrell Smith)
    I tend to agree with your thesis. The new point system clearly encourages a one question one answer model. After all, what incentive does Apple now give me to answer a question that has been answered? Any thread that now has an answer is, for all intents and purposes, dead. (assuming you and I are here to earn points and move up the ladder)

    But this is indeed a flawed model. Consider a question asked by an iPod owner a few years back. Like many newbs today, he wanted to know how to deal with owning a 10 gig iPod and a 40 gig iTunes collection. There were already numerous answers by the time I arrived but I weighed in because I was using a variation on a theme already mentioned. As the discussion moved on for another week or so l picked up several new ideas. We all did.

    Think how this could evolve today:
    Q: how do I handle an iTunes collection that is much larger than my iPod?
    A: a thoughtful paragraph about playlists or a URL to an Apple help page
    Q: thanks for the help, here's 10 pts

    The thread is now marked answered, the discussion ends, we are all a little poorer.

    How can this be resolved?
    Keep the 10/5 pt awards for the questioner. To encourage the questioner to actually award the points, give a point or two for thus responding.

    Return the ability to award points to everyone - perhaps hold it back until one reaches level 2.
    15 al PB / G5 Dual processor, Mac OS X (10.4.2), WinXP (sigh) and iPod
  • Austin Kinsella1 Level 6 Level 6 (11,505 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2005 3:19 PM (in response to Terrell Smith)
    I agree. It seems like an attempt to turn the enthusiastic volunteers into unpaid helpdesk employees - q,a,q,a, bang bang next please.

    As a matter of interest, Terrell, can you now award yourself points for your brilliant informative helpful answers to your question?
    AK
    Powerbook G4, Mac OS X (10.4.2), 1GB RAM
  • Grant Bennet-Alder Level 8 Level 8 (48,120 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2005 4:11 PM (in response to Terrell Smith)
    2) You go to the Apple Discussions and ask. You get
    your answer from the community ...


    It is wrong.

    You mark the question solved. No one bothers to check the answer, as the problem is solved.

    You go off cursing Apple and its forums. Community erodes. Level 4's (who are already internally well motivated to offer their advice) are off chasing the points, rather than being genuinely helpful for its own sake. Quality deteriorates. No one seems to know why.

    If you ask Consumer reports, the previous Apple forums are part of the best support package in this industry. Look carefully at what motivates your current best posters, and do not change to a different motivator without thoroughly researching its impact. Gratuitous changes to fundamentals without proper research is a recipe for a disaster like "New Coke".
    G4/867,G3 B&W,G3 AIO,5500,Q840AV, 10.3, 9.2, & older - LW IIg, LW 4/600, ATalk ImageWriter LQ
  • RTP Calculating status...
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2005 4:33 PM (in response to Terrell Smith)
    Hi Terrell,

    One thing was really bugging me about this new format. Well, you put the finger right on it: community.

    I simply do not know if we will be able to (re)build the community we had in the old format. I hope so. But achieving this will ask for major changes in this "better" way of doing things.

    Roger the Photographer
    Montréal
  • Tom Graves Level 7 Level 7 (20,615 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2005 4:51 PM (in response to Terrell Smith)
    Just for context. The reasons you state about what is wrong with the new format are exactly some of the same reasons people gave for not liking the old format when it was new two years ago.
    1 Ghz 15 inch PowerBook G4, Mac OS X (10.4.3), 1984 Macintosh
  • Geoffrey Lo Calculating status...
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2005 4:56 PM (in response to RTP)
    I completely agree. The new format destroys having a community. I thought what made Apple Discussions stand out from Genius Bars etc,. is that there are dozens of people willing to share their opinions / how to get things done. Right now, all incentives for taking part in a group conversation have disappeared. There are no pluses for being higher up on the level chart, no way to + or - someone else's post, and heck, there's no way to see how many points I have anymore.
    PowerBook G4 12" 867MHz, Mac OS X (10.4.3), 640MB RAM
  • RTP Level 5 Level 5 (4,875 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2005 5:01 PM (in response to Tom Graves)
    Good to know, Tom. But I think his point about community is well taken. And even in this case, what we have as a community should be preserved as much as possible, IMHO.

    Not an easy transition, as any transition, of course.

    Roger the Photographer
    Montréal
    G5 1.8Dual, 2GB RAM, Mac OS X (10.4.3), External Lacie, iPod, Bach on Altec Lansing, Canon 5D and 20D, hates all zooms.
  • A A P L Level 7 Level 7 (21,730 points)
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2005 5:49 PM (in response to Terrell Smith)
    If one's only motivation to help is to get points or "move up" then yes, you're right.
    I hardly think that's the case, and I'm a gen-u-wine pessimist.

    I don't really dig the new format, but for totally different reasons - it feels clunky and inefficient, space-wise.

    I'm going to give it a chance before flaming, but I don't see the point-system as too bad, unless one only wants a virtual "attaboy"

    Scott
    1.33Ghz 17 PB, G5x2, Mac OS X (10.4.3)

Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Apple Support Communities Terms of Use.